Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:12:54.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Epistemology: Theory and Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2009

Alvin I. Goldman
Alvin I. Goldman
Affiliation:
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 64 , July 2009 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce and Ayres, Ian (2002) Voting with Dollars: A New Paradigm for Campaign Finance. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul (2006) Fear of Knowledge. New York, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Barry and Bloor, David (1982) “Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge,” in Rationality and Relativism (eds.) Hollis, M. and Lukes, S.. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fleck, Ludwig (1979) The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, (eds.) Trenn, T. J. and Merton, R. K.. Chicago, Ill, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve (1988) Social Epistemology. Bloomington, Ind, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin (1979) “What Is Justified Belief,” in Justification and Knowledge, (ed.) Pappas, G.. Dordrecht, Reidel. Reprinted in Goldman, Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin (1986) Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin (1999) Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David (1972) Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals (1977), (ed.) Selby-Bigge, L. A., 2nd edn. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. F. and Wearne, P. (1998) Tainting Evidence: Inside the Scandals at the FBI Crime Lab. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Koppl, Roger (2006) “Democratic Epistemics: An Experiment on How to Improve Forensic Science.” http://papers.econ.mpg.de/evo/discussionpapers/2006-09.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, Ill, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1970) “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (91–196), (eds.) Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (1970) An Inquiry into the Human Mind, ed. Duggan, Timothy. Chicago, Ill, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saks, Michael et al. (2001) “Model Prevention and Remedy of Erroneous Convictions Act,” Arizona State Law Journal 33, 665–718.Google Scholar
Sokal, Alan and Bricmont, Jean (1998) Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science. New York, Picador USA.Google Scholar