Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T14:28:56.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023

Meng Xuan Zhang ,
Anise M.S. Wu Open the ORCID record for Anise M.S. Wu [Opens in a new window] ,
Ling Z. Zhang  and
Long W. Lam
Meng Xuan Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Humanities, School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Anise M.S. Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China
Ling Z. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Macau, Macao, China
Long W. Lam
Affiliation:
Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Macau, Macao, China
*
Corresponding author: Anise M.S. Wu; Email: anisewu@um.edu.mo
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The prevalence of workaholism has negative consequences on human health. Lack of sleep, a well-known problem among adults in modern society, is often attributed to overwork as a result of workaholism. Yet there is a lack of empirical research examining how and when workaholism will lead to sleep problems. To answer this question and to examine the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep in China, we investigate the mediating role of perceived evening responsibilities of work and the moderating effect of work autonomy. Two hundred and five Chinese working adults (58.0% female) voluntarily completed the online questionnaires at Time 1 (T1) and Time 2 (T2; 1-month later). Results showed that workaholism at T1 had a significant and positive correlation with sleep problem at T2. Further analysis suggested that perceived evening responsibilities of work fully mediated the relationship between workaholism and sleep problem. Work autonomy was shown to buffer the positive effect of workaholism on perceived evening responsibilities of work and attenuate the indirect effect of workaholism on sleep problem. While workers should be made aware of the negative impact of workaholism on sleep, organizations should also consider interventions to enhance employees’ autonomy and control of their work.

Topics structure

Topic(s)

Etiology

Subtopic(s)

Risks and protective factors, including social risk

Keywords

workaholismsleep problemwork autonomyChinese workersevening work

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health , Volume 10 , 2023 , e75
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Impact statement

Workaholism is a common phenomenon among modern workers that can harm your health and productivity. Sleep problem, another phenomenon affecting millions of workers worldwide, is posited to be related to workaholism. This study reveals whether and how workaholism can affect your sleep quality, an important aspect of your well-being, over time. We surveyed Chinese working adults twice and found that workaholism led to sleep problems by increasing the perceived evening responsibilities of work. In other words, workaholics feel they have to work even after leaving the office, which prevents them from relaxing and sleeping well. On the other hand, we also found that work autonomy can buffer the negative effects of workaholism by giving workers more control and flexibility over their work. Workers with more autonomy can decide when, where and how they work, reducing their stress and improving their sleep quality. This study contributes to the literature that workaholism influences sleep via work-related perceptions. Modifying these perceptions (e.g., work autonomy) as well as some organizational policies (e.g., work hours and night work) thus may reduce the adverse impacts of workaholism on workers’ health and well-being. This study’s findings provide practical implications for workers, managers and policymakers who are concerned about the well-being of the workforce in a rapidly changing and competitive environment.

Introduction

The term workaholism originates from Oates (Reference Oates1971), which has been referred to as “…the compulsion or the uncontrollable need to work incessantly” (p. 11). Research on workaholism has suggested that it comprises two factors: working excessively and working compulsively, with the former referring to spending more time on work-related activities beyond the need for organizational and economic requirements, and the latter emphasizes the obsession to work and a sense of loss of control over it even when they not working (Schaufeli et al., Reference Schaufeli, Taris and Bakker2008). The latter is considered to be the addictive feature of workaholism, being driven by the workers’ inner needs and compulsions rather than external rewards (Shimazu et al., Reference Shimazu, Schaufeli and Taris2010). As such, workaholism has also been referred to as work addiction, including symptoms similar to other addictive behaviors. Specifically, workaholism as an addiction includes symptoms such as loss of control over when to do work and consistent preoccupation with work. The addictive symptoms and related outcomes of workaholism have thus given rise to growing public health concerns, including work–family conflicts (Tahir and Aziz, Reference Tahir and Aziz2019), reduced job satisfaction (Caesens et al., Reference Caesens, Stinglhamber and Luypaert2014), deteriorated health (Schou Andreassen et al., Reference Schou Andreassen, Ursin and Eriksen2007) and poor sleep quality (Kubota et al., Reference Kubota, Shimazu, Kawakami and Takahashi2014).

Workaholism is a rather prevalent phenomenon among working adults. A review of workaholism studies suggested that the percentage of workaholic employees can be as high as one-third of the working population (Sussman, Reference Sussman2012). More employees were reported as workaholics recently. A study in Korea revealed that the prevalence of workaholism was 39.7% in a sample of 4,242 adult employees (Kang, Reference Kang2020). To address the public concerns about workaholism, the purpose of our study is to investigate the influence of workaholism on sleep and its underlying mechanism among Chinese working adults. Specifically, we conducted a longitudinal study by measuring sleep problem 1 month after measuring workaholism, and examined the hypothesized moderated mediation model (see Figure 1). Our investigation is important for several reasons. First, while we are aware of the adverse impact of workaholism on sleep, little is known about how workaholism could lead to such problem. Our investigation of perceived evening responsibility as the mediator may shed light on this issue. Second, overtime in China has been increasingly common and employees were reported to contribute about 10 hours above their normal work hours per week (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2021). Surprisingly, while the extent of workaholism in China is believed to be higher than that in European countries (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Schaufeli, Taris, Hessen, Hakanen, Salanova and Shimazu2014), there is virtually no research examining employees’ workaholism in China. Third, studies have shown that Chinese adults suffer from poor sleep quality which is another public concern (e.g., Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Li, Xu and Xiang2018; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Meng, Zhu, Xu, Guo, Yang and Mu2022). By examining the buffering role of work autonomy (e.g., Ten Brummelhuis et al., Reference Ten Brummelhuis, Rothbard and Uhrich2017), our study can inform researchers and organizations how to accentuate the negative influence of workaholism on sleep among Chinese employees.

Figure 1.

The hypothesized model.

Workaholism and sleep problem

Sleep problem has been regarded as a common symptom of many medical diseases and disorders, including cancer (Wong and Fielding, Reference Wong and Fielding2011; Matthews and Wang, Reference Matthews and Wang2022) and depression (Nutt et al., Reference Nutt, Wilson and Paterson2008). Its prevalence in the adult population has been rising and high before and after the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., 27% in young adults [Becker et al., Reference Becker, Jarrett, Luebbe, Garner, Burns and Kofler2018] and 35% in the general population [Dragioti et al., Reference Dragioti, Li, Tsitsas, Lee, Choi, Kim and Solmi2022]). Considering such high prevalence and its linkages with other health problems, scholars have thus considered sleep problem to be one of the most challenging health issues causing enormous burdens in modern society (Bhaskar et al., Reference Bhaskar, Hemavathy and Prasad2016; Becker et al., Reference Becker, Jarrett, Luebbe, Garner, Burns and Kofler2018). While sleep problem has less to do with complex sleep disorders such as sleep apnea and night terrors, it usually refers to the difficulty of falling asleep and/or maintaining sleep (Buysse et al., Reference Buysse, Reynolds, Monk, Berman and Kupfer1989). Previous empirical research has shown a significant association between workaholism and sleep problem such as insomnia, short sleep duration and poor sleep quality (e.g., Andreassen et al., Reference Andreassen, Pallesen and Torsheim2018). A 7-month longitudinal study in Japan revealed that workaholism was associated with higher levels of sleep latency and daytime dysfunction (Kubota et al., Reference Kubota, Shimazu, Kawakami and Takahashi2014). Moreover, since workaholics tend to be obsessed with their work and cannot stop thinking about work, such thoughts may still linger during their bedtime and interfere with their capacity to fall to sleep (Van den Broeck et al., Reference Van den Broeck, Schreurs, De Witte, Vansteenkiste, Germeys and Schaufeli2011; Salanova et al., Reference Salanova, López-González, Llorens, del Líbano, Vicente-Herrero and Tomás-Salvá2016). These reasons lead us to expect a positive association between workaholism and sleep problem among Chinese employees.

The roles of work responsibilities and work autonomy

For the relationship between workaholism and sleep problem, work responsibility in the evening is expected to play a vital role. Specifically, we expect workaholic employees to perceive more workload after completion of their normal work schedule (e.g., nine-to-five schedule) and feel the need to complete work during the evenings and even the nighttime (Kaiser et al., Reference Kaiser, Li and Pollmann-Schult2019). We further expect individuals with high perceived work responsibilities in the evening to have trouble falling asleep and maintaining sleep. That is because a key distinguishing feature of workaholism is work compulsively (Shimazu et al., Reference Shimazu, Schaufeli and Taris2010). If workaholics perceive a high workload in the evening, they may continue to work at the expense of time for sleep. This would contribute to more sleep problems. Moreover, Leroy’s (Reference Leroy2009) research suggested that people have attention residue from the previous task which affects how they perform the subsequent task. The attention residue effect is shown to be stronger when the previous task is not finished. Thus, when workaholic employees work in the evening, the attention residue left from work is likely to interfere with their sleep at night. A previous study provided support to this attention residue effect by showing that employees doing shift work would report more sleep disturbance due to their evening/night work schedule (Kerkhof, Reference Kerkhof2018). These reasons lead us to expect that workaholic employees, because of their perceived evening responsibility, will suffer from sleep problems.

We further posit that work autonomy, refers to perceived freedom and control over task arrangement (Spector, Reference Spector1986), to attenuate the hypothesized relationship between workaholism and sleep via perceived evening responsibilities. According to the Job Demand-Control Model (Karasek, Reference Karasek1979), job control can buffer the impact of job demands on the strain and improve job satisfaction and well-being (Gameiro et al., Reference Gameiro, Chambel and Carvalho2020). Based on this model, researchers found employees with higher work autonomy to have better work productivity and job performance and report high job satisfaction and commitment (Khoshnaw and Alavi, Reference Khoshnaw and Alavi2020). We thus expect the proposed relationship (workaholism is positively related to sleep problem through perceived evening responsibilities (i.e., workaholism ➔ perceived evening responsibilities ➔ sleep problem) to be weaker at high work autonomy but stronger at low work autonomy.

Specifically, with high work autonomy, individuals have more freedom and control over the pace of their work (i.e., when and how to do it). While workaholic employees are still compelled to do their work, with high work autonomy, they may be more able to modify their work schedules in order to work more efficiently (Ramaswamy and Rajeesh Viswanathan, Reference Ramaswamy and Rajeesh Viswanathan2020). Thus, they may perceive less need to engage in work every evening and night, and as such, are less likely to suffer from sleep problems. On the other hand, when workaholic employees perceive low autonomy for their work, they may experience less control over their work schedules. Thus, their compulsion to work may still persist in the evenings, which may interfere with their sleep cycles (Tucker et al., Reference Tucker, Bejerot, Kecklund, Aronsson and Åkerstedt2015). As perceived evening responsibilities contribute to more sleep problems, we expect the mediated or indirect effect of workaholism on sleep problem to be less (more) pronounced under high (low) work autonomy.

The hypotheses of the present study

This longitudinal study aims to empirically test the adverse influence of workaholism on sleep and a potential moderated mediation effects by evening responsibilities and work autonomy on such influence among Chinese working adults. Based on Figure 1, below is a summary of our hypotheses:

Hypothesis 1 (H1): There is a positive association between workaholism and sleep problem.

H2: Perceived evening responsibilities is positively associated with sleep problem.

H3: Perceived evening responsibilities mediate the relationship between workaholism and sleep problem.

H4: Work autonomy moderates the mediated relationship between workaholism and sleep problem via perceived evening responsibilities so that the mediated relationship is stronger at low rather than high levels of work autonomy.

Methods

Participants and procedures

Employees with at least 6 months of work experience were recruited from So-jump, a crowdsourcing platform for surveying working adults in China. In the first survey (T1), participants voluntarily answered the anonymous questionnaire, including workaholism, work autonomy, perceived evening responsibilities and demographical variables). In the second survey (T2), respondents were asked to report their sleep problem. The company (So-jump) made initial contact with 330 working adults and 205 of them (58.0% female, 85.9% aged 21–40 years old) completed surveys of both T1 and T2.

Before filling out the questionnaires in both waves, all participants were recruited by voluntary principle and provided their consent forms before the formal study. Their rights in the research (e.g., the confidentiality of their private information and dropping out of this research at any time without punishment) have been clarified in advance. The study procedures were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board of the Department of Psychology at the corresponding author’s affiliated university approved the study.

Measures

All the scales used in this study were translated into Chinese version following Brislin’s (Reference Brislin1970) suggestion. During the process of translation and back-translation process by the bilingual research assistants, we also asked the opinions of working adults to construct the items in Chinese and conducted a pilot study pre-testing the translated measures.

Workaholism

Following previous research (Taris et al., Reference Taris, Schaufeli and Verhoeven2005), we used the Compulsive Tendencies subscale of Work Addiction Risk Scale (Robinson, Reference Robinson1999) to measure workaholism. This scale comprised eight items with a sample item “I put myself under pressure with self-imposed deadlines when I work.” Participants rated all items on the 7-point scale (1 = “Strongly Disagree” to 7 = “Strongly Agree”). A higher total score represents a higher level of workaholism. The Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was .78 in this study.

Perceived evening responsibilities of work

We measure perceived evening responsibilities of work based on two items: “A good amount of my work took place during evenings or nights” and “I found myself to be the busiest at work during the evenings or nights” on a 7-point scale (1 = “Strongly Disagree” to 7 = “Strongly Agree”). The scale was developed based on Härmä et al.’s (Reference Härmä, Koskinen, Ropponen, Puttonen, Karhula, Vahtera and Kivimäki2017) and Cully’s (Reference Cully1998) studies on work time and responsibility. A higher total score indicates a higher level of perceived evening responsibilities of work and the scale had a good reliability (α = .85) in this study.

Work autonomy

Similar to previous research (Spretizer, Reference Spreitzer1995), we used Hackman and Oldham’s (Reference Hackman and Oldham1975) scale to measure work autonomy. The scale has three items (e.g., “I can decide on my own how to go about doing my work”) capturing the degree of individual’s choice and discretion involved in a job. Participants rated on 7-point scale from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree.” The Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was .78 in this study.

Sleep problem

Following Ten Brummelhuis et al. (Reference Ten Brummelhuis, Rothbard and Uhrich2017), we measured the participants’ sleep problem based on a scale developed by Van Veldhoven and Meijman (Reference Van Veldhoven and Meijman1994). Participants rated items such as “I wake up several times during the night” on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree). The internal reliability was .87 in this study.

Demographics

Gender (1 = male, 2 = female), age (1 = ≤ 20 years to 8 = >51 years), educational level (1 = Primary school education to 6 = Graduate or above) and tenure (1 = half year or less to 6 = 10 years or above) were also reported in the surveys.

Statistical analyses

In this study, the data of those participants who completed both baseline and follow-up surveys were included in the data analyses. Consistent with previous empirical studies (e.g., Bhandari et al., Reference Bhandari, Neupane, Rijal, Thapa, Mishra and Poudyal2017; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Meng, Ma, Guo, Zhu, Fu and Mu2022), the proposed moderated mediation model (Figure 1) was first examined with PROCESS in SPSS 26, with 5,000 replications in bootstrapping (Hayes, Reference Hayes2009). The effects of gender, age, education level and tenure on all the variables were controlled for during the model testing. Either the p-value or 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for examining the significance of the results.

Results

Univariate correlations with sleep problem

For demographic effects, educational level was negatively associated with sleep problem (r = −.21, p < .001), while age was significantly and positively correlated with sleep problem (r = .15, p < .05). Gender was not significantly correlated with any variables except perceived evening responsibilities (r = −.15, p < .05).

Consistent with our expectation, workaholism (T1) showed a significant and positive correlation with sleep problem (T2) (r = .23, p < .001). It also significantly and positively associated with perceived evening responsibilities (T2) (r = .44, p < .001), which had a significant and positive correlation with sleep problem (T2) (r = .39, p < .001). in the correlation matrix is displayed in Table 1.

Table 1.

The descriptive information and correlations of all variables (N = 205)

ER, perceived evening responsibilities of work; SD, standard deviation; T1, Time 1; T2, Time 2.

* p < .05,

** p < .01, and

*** p < .001.

a 1 = ≤20 years (0.5%), 2 = 21–25 years (13.2%), 3 = 26–30 years (32.2%), 4 = 31–35 years (23.9%), 5 = 36–40 years (16.1%), 6 = 41–45 years (7.3%), 7 = 46–50 years (4.4%), 8= > 50 years (2.4%).

b 1 = Male and 2 = Female.

The moderated mediation model

Controlled for all the demographic effects, our analysis shows that workaholism was significantly related to perceived evening responsibilities (T2; β = .44, 95% CI = (.34, .54)). After controlling for the effect of workaholism, perceived evening responsibilities were also significantly related to sleep problem (β = .34, 95% CI = (.18, .50)). We thus had evidence supporting H1 and H2.

While we did not find a significant direct effect of workaholism (T1) on sleep problem (T2) (β = .07, 95% CI = (−.07, .21)), our results showed that the relationship between workaholism (T1) and sleep problem (T2) was mediated by perceived evening responsibilities (T1), with workaholism’s indirect effect (β) = .15 and 95% CI = (.08, .24). Thus, H3 was supported.

Our results also showed work autonomy (T1) having a significant moderating effect on the relationship between workaholism (T1) and perceived evening responsibilities (T1) (β = −.02, 95% CI = (−.04, −.01)). For the other two paths (perceived evening responsibilities on sleep problem; workaholism on sleep problem), work autonomy did not have any significant moderating effect. With this result, we plotted the relationship between workaholism and perceived evening responsibilities at the high and low levels of work autonomy (see Figure 2).

Figure 2.

The moderating effect of autonomy between workaholic and perceived evening responsibilities of work.

Consistent with H4, the positive association between workaholism (T1) and perceived evening responsibilities (T1) was weaker among the participants with a higher level of work autonomy (T1) (β = .08, 95% CI = (.02, .14)) than those with the lower level of work autonomy (T1) (β = .22, 95% CI = (.16, .28)). Based on the final moderated mediation model (Figure 3), the conditional indirect effect of workaholism (T1) on sleep problem (T2) via perceived evening responsibilities (T1) was computed. The effect was weaker at high level (β = .06, 95% CI = (.03, .16)) but stronger at low level of work autonomy (β = .17, 95% CI = (.07, .28)). This evidence was supportive of H4.

Figure 3.

The moderated mediation model.

Note: **p < .01, ***p < .001.

Discussion

To our best knowledge, this study is one of the pioneering research to test the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults. We also investigated the mediating effect of perceived evening responsibilities and the buffering effect of work autonomy. As hypothesized, workaholism had a significant and positive association with sleep problem via perceived evening responsibilities. This finding is consistent with prior studies on workaholism (Nam and Lee, Reference Nam and Lee2019; Dutheil et al., Reference Dutheil, Charkhabi, Ravoux, Brousse, Dewavrin, Cornet and Pereira2020). We observed no gender difference in workaholism and sleep problem in our Chinese worker sample, suggesting that both male and female workers are equally prone to difficulties falling to sleep and maintaining sleeping quality if they are workaholics. Considering that workaholism is driven by inner obsession, workaholics should realize their tendency of workaholism and its negative impact on sleep health and seek help from professional counseling.

For the underlying mechanisms of the relationship between workaholism and sleep problem, this study found that perceived evening responsibilities of work served as the mediator of such relationship. Workaholism was positively associated with perceived evening responsibilities of work, which was associated with more sleep problems among Chinese workers. Since workaholics are obsessed with their work compulsively (Huml et al., Reference Huml, Taylor and Dixon2021), their sense of work responsibilities will linger after work, and are likely to prioritize their work over other activities (Song and Lee, Reference Song and Lee2021). If they decide to work in the evenings and at nights, they will risk disturbing the biological rhythms by changing their sleep patterns (Song and Lee, Reference Song and Lee2021). Disturbance of sleep patterns will then give rise to sleep problem, including long sleep latency, short sleep duration and/or poor sleep quality.

Our results showed that work autonomy can attenuate the relationship between workaholism and perceived evening responsibilities of work so that workaholism has a less adverse impact on sleep. Proponents of the Job-Demand-Control model contend that job control in the form of work autonomy can buffer the negative impact of job demands on strain (Gameiro et al., Reference Gameiro, Chambel and Carvalho2020) and reduce the negative influence of workaholic emotions on emotional exhaustion (Spagnoli and Molinaro, Reference Spagnoli and Molinaro2020). Consistent with the model’s expectation, this study found that work autonomy could also buffer the effect of workaholism on perceived evening responsibilities of work. Workers, even if they have more obsession to work than others, will have more control over their work time to better align their work hours with their nonwork arrangements when they have higher work autonomy (Tucker et al., Reference Tucker, Bejerot, Kecklund, Aronsson and Åkerstedt2015). Thus, we believe that work autonomy may help workers reduce work–sleep interference.

Both workaholism and perceived evening responsibilities are risk factors for sleep quality. Behavioral change interventions may help workers to reestablish a healthy lifestyle (Weinstein et al., Reference Weinstein, Chilton, Turchi, Klassen, LaNoue, Lamar and Cabassa2019) and reduce work addiction. Relevant organizational regulations may also be set to prevent excessing working in the evenings or at night. Employers should be aware of the negative impact of workaholism and workload in the evenings on sleep and work-health balance. As work autonomy can buffer the relationship between workaholism and perceived evening responsibilities of work, managerial interventions are needed to enhance the perceived control of work in order to allow workers to have more autonomy to schedule their work, and the ways to accomplish them. Although we emphasized the importance of work autonomy, other factors in the Chinese culture may also play a role in the workaholism–sleep relationship. For example, people in a collectivistic culture value connectedness with significant others (Potipiroon and Faerman, Reference Potipiroon and Faerman2020). Support from family and friends may prevent workaholic employees from suffering from resource strain or sleep problems. Thus, researchers may further test whether social support can serve as a moderator in the workaholism–sleep relationship.

This study has several limitations. First, our convenience sample with most of the participants in the younger generation may limit the generalizability of the findings to the entire workforce. Some participants also only participated in the first but not the second round of the survey. More worker samples in China should be collected in order to evaluate the effect of workaholism in future research. Second, the measurement of variables (e.g., workaholism and sleep problem) relies on self-report questionnaires, and most of the scales were originally developed and validated in Western societies, which may be susceptible to response biases and subjective judgment. These scales could be further validated among the Chinese working population. Further studies can also consider the use of objective measures (e.g., sleep applications in smartphone devices; see Grigsby-Toussaint et al., Reference Grigsby-Toussaint, Shin, Reeves, Beattie, Auguste and Jean-Louis2017) in addition to self-reported data. Third, we collected survey data from the general working population and did not have access to clinical samples with sleep or addictive disorders. Since we did not obtain data of workaholism and sleep problem via the clinical diagnosis of participants, future studies are encouraged to adopt the clinical perspective in assessing and evaluating these variables. Fourth, the one-month interval may not be long enough to fully reveal the impact of workaholism on sleep. To understand the full impact of workaholism, researchers may consider studies based on longer time periods and other techniques of data analysis (e.g., cross-lagged panel model) to further test the workaholism–sleep problem relationship as well as its autoregressive effects.

Despite these limitations, this study is the first to show the negative longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep health among Chinese working adults. Our study’s findings reveal that careful work design in terms of work autonomy can buffer the positive effect of workaholism on perceived evening responsibilities. Organizations should consider enhancing work autonomy and work flexibility to order to promote work-health balance among workers.

Conclusions

Workaholic employees are obsessed with work, which seems like a good thing to companies striving for productivity and profitability. But organizations should also take into account that some of the consequences of workaholism have to do with negative impacts on employees’ well-being. For example, sleep quality is related to employees’ physical and psychological conditions the next day (Schilpzand et al., Reference Schilpzand, Houston and Cho2018). Therefore, we are eager to know whether workaholic employees have significant sleep problem and how to buffer it. Our research finally reveals that workaholism is positively correlated with sleep problem. Further, we highlight that perceived evening responsibilities are the mediation mechanism between workaholism and sleep problem. However, work autonomy could buffer the positive effect of workaholism on perceived evening responsibilities of work and attenuate the indirect effect of workaholism on sleep problem. These hypotheses gained support from a field study. We hope our research stimulates future work to consider the research on the health-related consequences of workaholism and the associated buffering factors.

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.68.

Data availability statement

Data are available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

Author contribution

M.X.Z. was involved in research conception, data analysis, literature review and manuscript writing. A.M.S.W. was involved in research conception, manuscript preparation and revision. L.Z.Z. was involved in questionnaire preparation and data collection. L.W.L. was responsible for the research conception and design, project coordination and manuscript revision. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interest

The authors declare none.

Ethics statement

The ethics approval was obtained from the research ethics committee of the Department of Psychology at the University of Macau (DPSY2021-20).

References

Andreassen, CS, Pallesen, S and Torsheim, T (2018) Workaholism as a mediator between work-related stressors and health outcomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, SP, Jarrett, MA, Luebbe, AM, Garner, AA, Burns, GL and Kofler, MJ (2018) Sleep in a large, multi-university sample of college students: Sleep problem prevalence, sex differences, and mental health correlates. Sleep Health 4(2), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhandari, PM, Neupane, D, Rijal, S, Thapa, K, Mishra, SR and Poudyal, AK (2017) Sleep quality, internet addiction and depressive symptoms among undergraduate students in Nepal. BMC Psychiatry 17, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhaskar, S, Hemavathy, D and Prasad, S (2016) Prevalence of chronic insomnia in adult patients and its correlation with medical comorbidities. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 5(4), 780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brislin, RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1(3), 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buysse, DJ, Reynolds, IIICF, Monk, TH, Berman, SR and Kupfer, DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research 28(2), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caesens, G, Stinglhamber, F and Luypaert, G (2014) The impact of work engagement and workaholism on well-being: The role of work-related social support. Career Development International 19, 813–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cully, M (1998) A Survey in Transition: The Design of the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Dragioti, E, Li, H, Tsitsas, G, Lee, KH, Choi, J, Kim, J and Solmi, M (2022) A large‐scale meta‐analytic atlas of mental health problems prevalence during the COVID‐19 early pandemic. Journal of Medical Virology 94(5), 1935–1949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dutheil, F, Charkhabi, M, Ravoux, H, Brousse, G, Dewavrin, S, Cornet, T and Pereira, B (2020) Exploring the link between work addiction risk and health-related outcomes using job-demand-control model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(20), 7594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gameiro, M, Chambel, MJ and Carvalho, VS (2020) A person-centered approach to the job demands–control model: A multifunctioning test of addictive and buffer hypotheses to explain burnout. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(23), 8871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigsby-Toussaint, DS, Shin, JC, Reeves, DM, Beattie, A, Auguste, E and Jean-Louis, G (2017) Sleep apps and behavioral constructs: A content analysis. Preventive Medicine Reports 6, 126–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackman, JR and Oldham, GR (1975) Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology 60(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härmä, M, Koskinen, A, Ropponen, A, Puttonen, S, Karhula, K, Vahtera, J and Kivimäki, M (2017) Validity of self-reported exposure to shift work. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 74(3), 228–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, AF (2009) Beyond baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs 76(4), 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Q, Schaufeli, W, Taris, T, Hessen, D, Hakanen, JJ, Salanova, M and Shimazu, A (2014) East is east and west is west and never the twain shall meet: Work engagement and workaholism across eastern and Western cultures. Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences 1(1), 6–24.Google Scholar
Huml, MR, Taylor, EA and Dixon, MA (2021) From engaged worker to workaholic: A mediated model of athletic department employees. European Sport Management Quarterly 21(4), 583–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, T, Li, J and Pollmann-Schult, M (2019) Evening and night work schedules and children’s social and emotional well-being. Community, Work & Family 22(2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S (2020) Workaholism in Korea: Prevalence and socio-demographic differences. Frontiers in Psychology 11, 3639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karasek, RA Jr (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerkhof, GA (2018) Shift work and sleep disorder comorbidity tend to go hand in hand. Chronobiology International 35(2), 219–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoshnaw, S and Alavi, H (2020) Examining the interrelation between job autonomy and job performance: A critical literature review. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering 3, 606–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, K, Shimazu, A, Kawakami, N and Takahashi, M (2014) Workaholism and sleep quality among Japanese employees: A prospective cohort study. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 21(1), 66–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leroy, S (2009) Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109(2), 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L, Wang, YY, Wang, SB, Zhang, L, Li, L, Xu, DD and Xiang, YT (2018) Prevalence of sleep disturbances in Chinese university students: A comprehensive meta‐analysis. Journal of Sleep Research 27(3), e12648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, X, Meng, D, Zhu, L, Xu, H, Guo, J, Yang, L and Mu, L (2022) Bedtime procrastination predicts the prevalence and severity of poor sleep quality of Chinese undergraduate students. Journal of American College Health 70(4), 1104–1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, EE and Wang, SY (2022) Cancer-related sleep wake disturbances. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 38, 151253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nam, G and Lee, S (2019) The effects of workaholics and job engagement on sleep quality: An experience sampling study on the role of psychological detachment. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 32(4), 419–437.Google Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2021) China Statistical Yearbook 2021. Available at http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2021/indexch.htm (accessed 17 January 2022).Google Scholar
Nutt, D, Wilson, S and Paterson, L (2008) Sleep disorders as core symptoms of depression. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 10(3), 329–336CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oates, WE (1971) Confessions of a Workaholic: The Facts about Work Addiction. New York: World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Potipiroon, W and Faerman, S (2020) Tired from working hard? Examining the effect of organizational citizenship behavior on emotional exhaustion and the buffering roles of public service motivation and perceived supervisor support. Public Performance & Management Review 43(6), 1260–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaswamy, MM and Rajeesh Viswanathan, D (2020) Teleworking with work autonomy enhances productivity of Indian IT professionals during COVID-19 pandemic. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 17(7), 6758–6770.Google Scholar
Robinson, BE (1999) The work addiction risk test: Development of a tentative measure of workaholism. Perceptual and Motor Skills 88(1), 199–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salanova, M, López-González, AA, Llorens, S, del Líbano, M, Vicente-Herrero, MT and Tomás-Salvá, M (2016) Your work may be killing you! Workaholism, sleep problems and cardiovascular risk. Work & Stress 30(3), 228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, WB, Taris, TW and Bakker, AB (2008) It takes two to tango: Workaholism is working excessively and working compulsively. In The Long Work Hours Culture: Causes, Consequences and Choices. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 203–226.Google Scholar
Schilpzand, P, Houston, L and Cho, J (2018) Not too tired to be proactive: Daily empowering leadership spurs next-morning employee proactivity as moderated by nightly sleep quality. Academy of Management Journal 61(6), 2367–2387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schou Andreassen, C, Ursin, H and Eriksen, HR (2007) The relationship between strong motivation to work, “workaholism”, and health. Psychology and Health 22(5), 615–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimazu, A, Schaufeli, WB and Taris, TW (2010) How does workaholism affect worker health and performance? The mediating role of coping. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 17(2), 154–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, YJ and Lee, YS (2021) Work hours, work schedules, and subjective well-being in Korea. International Sociology 36(1), 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spagnoli, P and Molinaro, D (2020) Negative (workaholic) emotions and emotional exhaustion: Might job autonomy have played a strategic role in workers with responsibility during the Covid-19 crisis lockdown? Behavioral Sciences 10(12), 192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spector, PE (1986) Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations 39(11), 1005–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreitzer, GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal 38(5), 1442–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, S (2012) Workaholism: A review. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy 6(1), 4120.Google Scholar
Tahir, S and Aziz, S (2019) Workaholism as predictor of work-family conflict and mental well-being of public and private sector employees. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS) 13(2), 419–435.Google Scholar
Taris, TW, Schaufeli, WB and Verhoeven, LC (2005) Workaholism in the Netherlands: Measurement and implications for job strain and work–nonwork conflict. Applied Psychology 54(1), 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Brummelhuis, LL, Rothbard, NP and Uhrich, B (2017) Beyond nine to five: Is working to excess bad for health? Academy of Management Discoveries 3(3), 262–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, P, Bejerot, E, Kecklund, G, Aronsson, G and Åkerstedt, T (2015) The impact of work time control on physicians’ sleep and well-being. Applied Ergonomics 47, 109–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Broeck, A, Schreurs, B, De Witte, H, Vansteenkiste, M, Germeys, F and Schaufeli, W (2011) Understanding workaholics’ motivations: A self‐determination perspective. Applied Psychology 60(4), 600–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Veldhoven, M and Meijman, T (1994) Measurement of Psychosocial Labor Burden: The Questionnaire Perception and Assessment of Labor (VVBA). Amsterdam: NIA.Google Scholar
Weinstein, LC, Chilton, M, Turchi, R, Klassen, A, LaNoue, M, Lamar, S and Cabassa, L (2019) Reaching for a healthier lifestyle: A photovoice investigation of healthy living in people with serious mental illness. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 13(4), 371–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, WS and Fielding, R (2011) Prevalence of insomnia among Chinese adults in Hong Kong: A population‐based study. Journal of Sleep Research 20(1pt1), 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y, Meng, D, Ma, X, Guo, J, Zhu, L, Fu, Y and Mu, L (2022) Examining the relationship between bedtime procrastination and personality traits in Chinese college students: the mediating role of self-regulation skills. Journal of American College Health 14, 1–7.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The hypothesized model.

Figure 1

Table 1. The descriptive information and correlations of all variables (N = 205)

Figure 2

Figure 2. The moderating effect of autonomy between workaholic and perceived evening responsibilities of work.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The moderated mediation model.Note: **p < .01, ***p < .001.

Author comment: Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults — R0/PR1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.68.pr1 [Opens in a new window]
Anise M.S. Wu [Opens in a new window] Department of Psychology, University of Macau, China
Revision round: 0
Role: author

Comments

Dear Editor,

We are writing to submit a manuscript entitled “Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults” to the Global Mental Health for publication as an original article.

This manuscript reports the findings of an anonymous questionnaire survey that aimed to test the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep and investigate the mediating role of perceived evening responsibilities of work and the moderating effect of work autonomy among Chinese workers. The results showed that workaholism at T1 was significantly and positively correlated with sleep problem at T2. The bootstrapping analysis suggested that perceived evening responsibilities of work fully mediated the relationship between workaholism and sleep problem. Moreover, work autonomy could buffer the positive effect of workaholism on perceived evening responsibilities of work and attenuate the indirect effect of workaholism on sleep problem. Considering the adverse effect of workaholism on sleep, organizations should also consider interventions to enhance employees’ autonomy and control for their work. The research obtained ethics approval from the research ethics committee of the Department of Psychology, University of Macau.

This manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under any concurrent journal review. Should you need any further information, please contact Dr. Meng Xuan Zhang, Department of Medical Humanities, School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, Jiangsu, China. E-mail: zhangmengxuan@seu.edu.cn. Phone: +(86) 15122560962

Yours Sincerely,

Prof. Anise M. S. Wu

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau, China.

E-mail: anisewu@um.edu.mo

Phone: +(853) 8822 8377

Fax: +853-8822-2337

Review: Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults — R0/PR2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.68.pr2 [Opens in a new window]
Reviewer_1
Date of review:  05 July 2023
Revision round: 0
Role: reviewer
Recommendation/decision: major-revision

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

This is a very interesting paper focusing on workaholism and sleep. Please consider revising it based on the comments below.

1. introduction

The researcher has noted in a previous study that The term workaholism originates from Oates (1971), which has been referred to as “...the compulsion or the uncontrollable need to work incessantly” (p.11). It is stated as follows. On the other hand, the current study design refers to changes in workaholism after one month. Considering the definition, can workaholism tendency change in such a short period of time?

P7.Methods

The number of subjects was 205. Is it possible to verify by post-test how many samples were originally needed? Please mention whether it was sufficient or not.

3. Is there any reason for limiting the sample to workers up to the age of 40? If so, please add a statement to that effect. If content, please provide a supplementary explanation in the limitations of the study. Are there any possible effects of targeting a relatively young generation?

P9. Methods

Is there any rationale for the 5000 for replication by the bootstrapping method? Please supplement any previous studies.

P12. limitation

Please mention any other possible confounding factors that may limit the study.

Recommendation: Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults — R0/PR3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.68.pr3 [Opens in a new window]
Carmen Contreras [Opens in a new window] Lima, Socios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Peru
Date of review:  18 July 2023
Revision round: 0
Role: Handling Editor
Recommendation/decision: major-revision

Comments

Thank you very much for submitting this article. It is a very interesting work, novel for mental health interventions. My comments are in relation to:

General

1. It is important to consider the temporality of the study, since in recent years the impact of global situations such as the covid-19 pandemic also affected mental health and labor and economic regimes worldwide. This can be considered an important context with a greater or lesser effect depending on the time of the study.

Although studies conducted in Asian countries are cited, the scales used were mostly constructed and validated in Western countries. It is important to consider the differences in thinking and perception of the Chinese population and to mention other studies related to welfare and work culture. This is also relevant in the construction of the discussion.

Participants and procedures

3. What happened to the 125 participants not contacted at T2, what were the reasons for non-contact.

4. During T2, were they assessed again with the workaholism scale? If not, in what way is it determined that workaholism problems still persisted and thus could still have an effect on sleep? It is possible that other cultural factors may be playing a role in their sleep?

6. It is also important to know if the participants suffered from any physical or mental health comorbidity, or if they were already receiving some type of treatment for health care and addiction regulation.

Measures

7. How were the scales used adapted to the language? Were they answered in English or translated into Chinese? Was there professional intervention for the correct adaptation of each scale? Consider that this could affect the understanding of the questions and the scale.

Why did you use only a subscale of Robinson’s Work Addiction Risk Test for the measurement and not other short scales such as the Berger Work Addiction Scale? Which has recently been published a validation article in Chinese social workers.

9. Has the scale of perceived work responsibilities been constructed by the study, and if it already existed, cite its authors.

Decision: Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults — R0/PR4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.68.pr4 [Opens in a new window]
Judith Bass [Opens in a new window] Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States
Revision round: 0
Role: Editor in Chief
Recommendation/decision: major-revision

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults — R1/PR5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.68.pr5 [Opens in a new window]
Anise M.S. Wu [Opens in a new window] Department of Psychology, University of Macau, China
Revision round: 1
Role: author

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults — R1/PR6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.68.pr6 [Opens in a new window]
Reviewer_1
Date of review:  09 September 2023
Revision round: 1
Role: reviewer
Recommendation/decision: accept

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

I think “acceptable” is acceptable because the paper is well responded to the peer review opinion.

Recommendation: Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults — R1/PR7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.68.pr7 [Opens in a new window]
Carmen Contreras [Opens in a new window] Lima, Socios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Peru
Date of review:  12 October 2023
Revision round: 1
Role: Handling Editor
Recommendation/decision: accept

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Work hard and sleep better: Work autonomy attenuates the longitudinal effect of workaholism on sleep problem among Chinese working adults — R1/PR8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.68.pr8 [Opens in a new window]
Judith Bass [Opens in a new window] Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States
Revision round: 1
Role: Editor in Chief
Recommendation/decision: accept

Comments

No accompanying comment.