Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:57:22.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National-level integrative ecological health assessments based on the index of biological integrity, water quality, and qualitative habitat evaluation index, in Korean rivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2011

Jae Hoon Lee ,
Jeong-Ho Han ,
Hema K. Kumar ,
Jun-Kil Choi ,
Hwa Kun Byeon ,
Jaeseok Choi ,
Jai-Ku Kim ,
Min-Ho Jang ,
Hae-Kyung Park  and
Kwang-Guk An
Jae Hoon Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305–764, Republic of Korea
Jeong-Ho Han
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305–764, Republic of Korea
Hema K. Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305–764, Republic of Korea
Jun-Kil Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, Sangji University, Wonju 220–702, Republic of Korea
Hwa Kun Byeon
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Education, Seowon University, Cheongju 361–742, Republic of Korea
Jaeseok Choi
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Research, Department of Biology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200–701, Republic of Korea
Jai-Ku Kim
Affiliation:
Chungrok Environmental Ecosystem Research Institute, Anyang 431–070, Republic of Korea
Min-Ho Jang
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Education, Kongju National University, Gongju 314–701, Republic of Korea
Hae-Kyung Park
Affiliation:
Water Environment Research Department, The National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 404–170, Republic of Korea
Kwang-Guk An*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305–764, Republic of Korea
*
*Corresponding author: kgan@cnu.ac.kr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate fish guild compositions and national river health using a multi-metric model of the Korean index of biological integrity using fishes (K-IBIF) in four major Korean watersheds along with water chemistry and habitat quality. Tolerant and omnivore fish species dominated all the watersheds, and the proportions of tolerance guilds and trophic guilds reflected water chemistry and habitat quality. The number of sensitive species and insectivore species had negative correlations (r < −0.42, P < 0.01) with chemical water quality (biological oxygen demand (BOD)), while tolerant species and omnivore species had positive correlation (r > 0.27, P < 0.05) with BOD values. Physical habit conditions, based on qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI) model, indicated a “good” condition (mean = 68.9; range = 45–105) in three watersheds, except for the Yeongsan River watershed. Values of QHEI were significantly correlated (R2 > 0.4, P < 0.01) with nitrogen and phosphorus levels in all watersheds, suggesting that habitat degradation is associated with eutrophication. Model values of K-IBIF in the watersheds averaged 18.2, indicating a “fair” condition, and about 37% of all observations in K-IBIF model values were judged as a “poor” health condition, indicating severe health impairment. Overall, our data suggest that degradation of the river health was due to a combined effect of chemical pollution and physical habitat modifications. This research provides valuable information on Korean river conservation and restoration in the future.

Keywords

River health conditionK-IBIF modelphysical habitat conditionwater quality
Type
Research Article
Information
Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology , Volume 47 , Issue S1: River ecosystem health assessment: the value in the management and restoration , 2011 , pp. S73 - S89
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2011

References

An, K.-G. and Lee, E.H., 2006. Ecological health assessments of Yoogu Stream using a fish community metric model. Korean J. Limnol., 39, 310–319 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
An, K.-G., Jung, S.H. and Choi, S.S., 2001a. An evaluation on health conditions of Pyong-Chang River using the index of biological integrity (IBI) and qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI). Korean J. Limnol., 34, 153–165 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
An, K.-G., Yeom, D.H. and Lee, S.K., 2001b. Rapid bioassessments of Kap Stream using the index of biological integrity. Korean J. Environ. Biol., 19, 216–269 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
An, K.-G., Kim, D.S., Kong, D.S. and Kim, S.D., 2004. Integrative assessments of a temperate stream based on a multimetric determination of biological integrity, physical habitat evaluations, and toxicity tests. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 73, 471–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
An, K.-G., Lee, J.Y., Bae, D.Y., Kim, J.H., Hwang, S.J., Won, D.H., Lee, J.K. and Kim, C.S., 2006. Ecological assessments of aquatic environment using multi-metric model in major nationwide stream watersheds. J. Korean Water Qual., 22, 796–804 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
APHA, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 21st edn., American Public Health Association, New York, NY.PubMed
Bae, D.Y. and An, K.-G., 2006. Stream ecosystem assessments, based on a biological multimetric parameter model and water chemistry analysis. Korean J. Limnol., 39, 198–208 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
Barbour, M.T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B.D. and Stribling, J.B., 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, 2nd edn., EPA 841-B-99-002, Office of Water, US EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Binns, N.A. and Eiserman, F.M., 1979. Quantification of fluvial trout habitat in Wyoming. T. Am. Fish. Soc., 108, 215–228.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, P.J., 2000. The development of integrated methods for assessing river conservation value. Hydrobiologia, 422, 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braak, C.J.F., 1987. The analysis of vegetation–environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetation, 69, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, A. and Shields, F.D. Jr., 1996. River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects, Wiley, Chichester, 433 p.Google Scholar
Choi, J.K., Byeon, H.K. and Seok, H.K., 2000. Studies on the dynamics of fish community in Wonju Stream. Korean J. Limnol., 33, 274–281 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
Choi, J.W. and An, K.-G., 2007. Fish composition and trophic guild analysis as a collection of basic data for ecosystem health assessments in Yeongsan Lake. Korean J. Limnol., 40, 546–552 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
Choi, J.W., Kumar, H.K., Han, J.H. and An, K.-G., 2011. The development of a regional multimetric fish model based on biological integrity in lotic ecosystems and some factors influencing the stream health. Water Air Soil Pollut., 217, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crumpton, W.G., Isenhart, T.M. and Mitchell, P.D., 1992. Nitrate and organic N analyses with second-derivative spectroscopy. Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 907–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desirree, D.T., David, L.P. and Gregory, D.J., 2006. Development and application of a bioindicator for benthic habitat enhancement in the North Carolina Piedmont. Ecol. Eng., 27, 228–241.Google Scholar
DIN 38410, 1990. Biological-ecological analysis of water (group M); determination of the saprobic index (M2). German standard methods for the examination of water, Part 2, Waste water and sludge, 10 p.
Drake, M.T. and Pereira, D.L., 2002. Development of a fish-based index of biotic integrity for small inland lakes in Central Minnesota. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 22, 1105–1123.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal, L327, 72 p.
Fore, L.S., Karr, J.R. and Conquest, L.L., 1993. Statistical properties of an index of biological integrity used to evaluate water resources. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51, 1077–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, J.A., 1985. The Restoration of Rivers and Streams, Butterworth, Stoneham, 280 p.Google Scholar
Han, J.H., Bae, D.Y. and An, K.-G., 2007. Ecosystem health assessments of Changwon Stream as a preliminary diagnosis for aquatic ecosystem restoration. Korean J. Limnol., 40, 527–536.Google Scholar
Hughes, R.M., Heiskary, S.A., Mathews, W.J. and Yoder, C.O., 1994. Use of ecoregions in biological monitoring. In: Loeb, S.L. and Spacie, A. (eds.), Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems, Lewis, Chelsea, 125–151. Google Scholar
Hugueny, B.S., Camara, B., Samoura, B. and Magassouba, M., 1996. Applying an index of biotic integrity based on communities in a West African river. Hydrobiologia, 331, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S.J., Kim, N.Y., Won, D.H., An, K.-G., Lee, J.K. and Kim, C.S., 2006. Biological assessment of water quality by using epilithic diatoms in major river systems (Geum, Youngsan, Seomjin River). J. Korean Water Qual., 22, 784–795 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
Karr, J.R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6, 21–27.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, J.R. and Dionne, M., 1991. Designing surveys to assess biological integrity in lakes and reservoirs. In: Biological Criteria Research and Regulation-Proceedings of a Symposium, EP-440/5-91-005, US EPA, Office of Waters, Washington, DC, 62–72.Google Scholar
Karr, J.R., Heidinger, R.C. and Helmer, E.H., 1985a. Effects of chlorine and ammonia from wastewater treatment facilities on biotic integrity. J. Water Pollut. Con. F., 57, 912–915.Google Scholar
Karr, J.R., Toth, L.A. and Dudley, D.R., 1985b. Fish communities of midwestern rivers: a history of degradation. BioScience, 35, 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, J.R., Fausch, K.D., Angermeier, P.L., Yant, P.R. and Schlosser, I.J., 1986. Assessment of biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale, Special publication 5, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, 28 p.Google Scholar
Kelly, M.G., Cazaubon, A., Coring, E., Dell'Uomo, A., Ector, L., Goldsmith, B., Guasch, H., Hurlimann, J., Jarlman, A., Kawecka, B., Kwandrans, J., Laugaste, R., Lindstrom, E.-A., Leitao, M., Marvan, P., Padisak, J., Pipp, E., Prygiel, J., Rott, E., Sabater, S., van Dam, H. and Vizinet, J., 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J. Phycol., 10, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M.G. and Whitton, B.A., 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol., 7, 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, I.S. and Park, J.Y., 2002. Freshwater fishes of Korea, Kyohaksa, Seoul, 465 p. (in Korean).Google ScholarPubMed
Kleynhans, C.J., 1999. The development of a fish index to assess the biological integrity of South African rivers. Water SA, 25, 265–278.Google Scholar
Koizumi, N. and Matsumiya, Y., 1997. Assessment of stream fish habitat based on index of biotic integrity. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Fish. Oceanogr., 61, 144–156.Google Scholar
Kwon, Y.S. and An, K.-G., 2006. Biological stream health and physico-chemical characteristics in the Keum-Ho River watershed. Korean J. Limnol., 39, 145–156 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
Lang, C. and Reymond, O., 1995. An improved index of environmental quality for Swiss rivers based on benthic invertebrates. Aquat. Sci., 57, 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, C., l'Eplattenier, G. and Reymond, O., 1989. Water quality in rivers of Western Switzerland: application of an adaptable index based on benthic invertebrates. Aquat. Sci., 51, 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.L., 2001. Ichthyofauna and fish community from the Gap Stream water system, Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol., 19, 292–301.Google Scholar
Lee, J.H. and An, K.-G., 2007. Seasonal dynamics of fish fauna and compositions in the Gap Stream along with conventional water quality. Korean J. Limnol., 40, 503–510.Google Scholar
Lee, J.H. and An, K.-G., 2010. Analysis of various ecological parameters from molecular to community level for ecological health assessments. Korean J. Limnol., 43, 24–34 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
Lee, W.O. and No, S.Y., 2006. Freshwater fishes of Korea based on characteristics: illustrated book, Jisungsa, Seoul, 432 p. (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L., 1998. Numerical ecology (developments in environmental modelling), 2nd English edn., Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Leidy, R.A. and Fiedler, P.L., 1985. Human disturbance and patterns of fish species diversity in the San Francisco Bay Drainage. Biol. Conserv., 33, 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limburg, K.E. and Schmidt, R.E., 1990. Patterns of fish spawning in Hudson River tributaries: response to an urban gradient. Ecology, 71, 1231–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J., Navarro-Perez, S., Cochran, P.A., Santana, E. and Guzman-Arroyo, M., 1995. Index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages for the conservation of streams and rivers in west-central Mexico. Conserv. Biol., 9, 569–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maezono, Y. and Miyashita, T., 2004. Impact of exotic fish removal on native communities in farm ponds. Ecol. Res., 19, 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B. and Mefford, M.J., 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 4.0, MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR.Google Scholar
MOE, 2000. Standard methods for the examination of water quality contamination, 7th edn., Gwacheon, Korea, 435 p. (in Korean).
MOE/NIER, 2006. Researches for integrative assessment methodology of aquatic environments (III): development of aquatic ecosystem health assessment and evaluation system, The Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Incheon, Korea (in Korean).
MOE/NIER, 2008. The survey and evaluation of aquatic ecosystem health in Korea, The Ministry of Environment/National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon, Korea (in Korean with English summary).
Morley, S.A. and Karr, J.R., 2002. Assessing and restoring the health of urban streams in the Puget Sound basin. Conserv. Biol., 16, 1498–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, M.M., 1996. Present status of Korean freshwater fish. In: 1996 Symposium of Korean Journal of Limnology Proc., 31–45 (in Korean).
Nurnberg, G.K., 1996. Trophic state of clear and colored, soft- and hard-water lakes with special consideration of nutrients, anoxia, phytoplankton and fish. Lake Reservoir Manage., 12, 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohio, EPA, 1989. Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Vol. III): Standardized Biological Field Sampling and Laboratory Method for Assessing Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities, Columbus, OH.
Olguin, H.G., Salibian, A. and Puig, A., 2000. Comparative sensitivity of Scenedesmus acutus and Chlorella pyrenoidosa as sentinel organisms for aquatic ecotoxicity assessment: studies on a highly polluted urban river. Environ. Toxicol., 15, 14–22.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plafkin, J.L., Barbour, M.T., Porter, K.D., Gross, S.K. and Hughes, R.M., 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrate and fish, EPA/444/4-89-001, Office of water regulations and standards, US EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Prepas, E.E. and Rigler, F.A. 1982. Improvements in qualifying the phosphorus concentration in lake water. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 39, 822–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, E.T. and Yoder, C.O., 1999. Adjustments to the index of biotic integrity: a summary of Ohio experiences and some suggested modifications. In: Simon, T.P. (ed.), Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 672 p.Google Scholar
Raven, P.J., Holmes, N.T.H., Dawson, F.H., Fox, P.J.A., Everard, M., Fozzard, I.R. and Rowen, K.J., 1998. River Habitat Quality: The Physical Character of Rivers and Streams in the UK and Isle of Man, Environment Agency, Bristol.
Rossano, E.M., 1996. Diagnosis of Stream Environments with Index of Biological Integrity, Sankaido Publishers, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Sanders, R.E., Miltner, R.J., Yoder, C.O. and Rankin, E.T., 1999. The use of external deformities, erosion, lesions, tumors (DELT anomalies) in fish assemblages for characterizing aquatic resources: a case study of seven Ohio streams. In: Simon, T.P. (eds.), Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 672 p.Google Scholar
Soto-Galera, E., Díaz-Pardo, E., López-López, E. and Lyons, J., 1998. Fish indicator of environmental quality in the Río Lerna Basin, México. Aquat. Ecosys. Health Manage., 1, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS, 2004. SPSS 12.0 KO for Windows, Apache Software Foundation, Chicago, IL.
Strahler, A.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 38, 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US EPA, 1993. Fish Field and Laboratory Methods for Evaluating the Biological Integrity of Surface Waters. EPA 600-R-92-111. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory – Cincinnati office of Modeling, Monitoring Systems, and Quality Assurance Office of Research Development, US EPA, Cincinnati, OH.
US EPA, 1994. Environmental monitoring and assessment program: integrated quality assurance project plan for the Surface Waters Resource Group. 1994 activities, Rev.2.00. EPA 600/X-91/080, US EPA, Las Vegas, NV.
US EPA, 1998. Lake and reservoir bioassessment and biocriteria technical guidance document, EP-841-B-98-007, US EPA, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
US EPA, 2002. Biological Assessments and Criteria, EPA 822-F-02-006, US EPA, Office of Water, Washington, DC.PubMed
Walton, B.M., Salling, M., Wyles, J. and Wolin, J., 2007. Biological integrity in urban streams: toward resolving multiple dimensions of urbanization. Landscape Urban Plan., 79, 110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winget, R.N. and Mangum, F.A., 1979. Biotic condition index: integrated biological, physical, and chemical stream parameters for management, Forest Service, Intermountain region, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ogden, UT.Google Scholar
Won, D.H., Jun, Y.C., Kwon, S.J., Hwang, S.J., An, K.-G. and Lee, J.K., 2006. Development of Korean saprobic index using benthic macroinvertebrates and its application to biological stream environment assessment. J. Korean Water Qual., 22, 768–783 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
Yeom, D.H., An, K.-G., Hong, Y.P. and Lee, S.K., 2000. Assessment of an index of biological integrity (IBI) using fish assemblages in Keum-Ho River, Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol., 18, 215–226 (in Korean with English summary).Google Scholar
Yoder, C.O., 1991. The Integrated Biosurvey as a Tool for Evaluation of Aquatic Life Use Attainment and Impairment in Ohio Surface Waters, EPA/440/5-91/005, US EPA, Washington, DC, 110–122.Google Scholar
Zhu, D. and Chang, J., 2008. Annual variations of biotic integrity in the upper Yangtze River using an adapted index of biotic integrity (IBI). Ecol. Indic., 8, 564–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar