Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T04:09:54.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Missing Effect of Party Cues in Japan: Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2018

TETSURO KOBAYASHI  and
TOMOYA YOKOYAMA
TETSURO KOBAYASHI
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kongtkobayas@cityu.edu.hk
TOMOYA YOKOYAMA
Affiliation:
Rikkyo University, Tokyo, Japantmyokoyama@rikkyo.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For voters with bounded rationality to emulate the formation of policy preferences under full information, party cues provide effective heuristics. Although the effect of party cuing has been robustly established in US-centered studies, the literature indicates that the characteristics of modern US politics, such as political polarization, magnify the effect of party cues. Therefore, the effect of party cues has been subject to only lenient empirical scrutiny, as empirical evidence exists primarily for the US. The present study aims to test the generalizability of the effect of party cues by focusing on Japan, where the ideological positions of parties have become increasingly vague. Furthermore, in light of the fact that the media system in Japan is more stable and ideologically polarized than its party system, we also test whether press cues (i.e. newspaper names) serve as substitutes for party cues. A survey experiment demonstrates that the effects of party and press cues in Japan are muted, and therefore these two types of cues do not serve as effective shortcuts in forming policy preferences. These results indicate that issue voting based on cognitive heuristics is difficult under an unstable multiparty system. Therefore, the extant literature on party cues that presupposes the US-style party system cannot be easily generalized to other political contexts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 61 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. (2010), The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization and American Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Akhavan-Majid, Roya (1990), ‘The Press as an Elite Power Group in Japan’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 67 (4): 1006–1014.Google Scholar
Akuto, Hiroshi (1996), ‘Media in Electoral Campaigning in Japan and the United States’, in Pharr, Susan J. and Krauss, Ellis S., (eds.), Media and Politics in Japan, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 313–337.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin (2008), ‘Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?’, Political Behavior, 30 (2): 139–160.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A. and Gussin, Phil (2008), ‘In the Eye of the Beholder: How Information Shortcuts Shape Individual Perceptions of Bias in the Media’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted A., Tucker, Joshua A., and Duell, Dominik (2013), ‘Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 46 (11): 1485–1517.Google Scholar
Brody, Richard A. and Page, Benjamin I. (1972), ‘The Assessment of Policy Voting’, American Political Science Review, 66 (2): 450–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G. (2011), ‘Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate’, American Political Science Review, 105 (3): 496–515.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob (1992), ‘A Power Primer’, Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1): 155–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Geoffrey L. (2003), ‘Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (5): 808–822.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. (1964), ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in Apter, David E. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coursol, Allan and Wagner, Edwin E. (1986), ‘Effect of Positive Findings on Submission and Acceptance Rates: A Note on Meta-analysis Bias’, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17 (2): 136–137.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Keeter, Scott (1996), What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. (2014), ‘Pathologies of Studying Public Opinion, Political Communication, and Democratic Responsiveness’, Political Communication, 31 (3): 467–492.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Eric, and Slothuus, Rune (2013), ‘How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation’, American Political Science Review, 107 (1): 57–79.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. and Chaiken, Shelley (1993), The Psychology of Attitudes, New York, NY: Harcourt Publishers.Google Scholar
Endo, Masahisa and Jou, Willy (2014), ‘How Does Age Affect Perceptions of Parties’ Ideological Locations?’, Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies, 30 (1): 96–112.Google Scholar
Faul, Franz, Erdfelder, Edgar, Lang, Albert-Georg, and Buchner, Axel (2007), ‘G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences’, Behavior Research Methods, 39 (2): 175–191.Google Scholar
Franco, Annie, Malhotra, Neil, and Simonovits, Gabor (2014), ‘Publication Bias in the Social Sciences: Unlocking the File Drawer’, Science, 345 (6203): 1502–1505.Google Scholar
Fujitake, Akira (2005), Zusetsu Nihon no masu media [Mass media in Japan], Tokyo: NHK Publishing.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin (2012), ‘Two-Thirds Full? Citizen Competence and Democratic Governance’, in Berinsky, Adam J. (ed.), New Directions in Public Opinion, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 52–76.Google Scholar
Goren, Paul, Federico, Christopher M., and Caul Kittilson, Miki (2009), ‘Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression’, American Journal of Political Science, 53 (4): 805–820.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric (2002), Partisan Hearts and Minds, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G. (1975), ‘Consequences of Prejudice against the Null Hypothesis’, Psychological Bulletin, 82 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Hirano, Hiroshi (2015), Yukensha no Sentaku: Nihon ni okeru Seito Seiji to Daihyousei Minshu shugi no yukue [The electorates’ choice: The future of party politics and representative democracy in Japan], Tokyo: Bokutakusha.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy and Power, Timothy J. (2007), ‘Rewarding Lula: Executive Power, Social Policy, and the Brazilian Elections of 2006’, Latin American Politics and Society, 49 (1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Imai, Ryosuke (2008), ‘Structure of Political Knowledge’, The Waseda Journal of Political Science and Economics, 370: 39–52.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and Hahn, Kyuu S. (2009), ‘Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use’, Journal of Communication, 59 (1): 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabashima, Ikuo and Takenaka, Yoshihiko (1996), Gendai Nihon Jin no Ideology [Political Ideology in Japan], Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Kabashima, Ikuo and Takenaka, Yoshihiko (2012), Ideology [Political Ideology], Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. (2005), ‘Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences’, Political Behavior, 27 (2): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. (1998), ‘Communication and Opinion’, Annual Review of Political Science, 1 (1): 167–197.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A. (1991), ‘Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5 (3): 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. (2010), ‘Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization’, Political Behavior, 32 (1): 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur (1994), ‘Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections’, The American Political Science Review, 88 (1): 63–76.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D. (1998), The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maniaci, Michael R. and Rogge, Ronald D. (2014), ‘Caring about Carelessness: Participant Inattention and Its Effects on Research’, Journal of Research in Personality, 48: 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose (2011), ‘Internal and External Validity’, in Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur, (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., Stephenson, Laura B., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. (2008), ‘Can Canadians Take a Hint? The (In) Effectiveness of Party Labels as Information Shortcuts in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 41 (3): 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, Asako and Kobayashi, Tetsuro (2015a), ‘Mechanical Japanese: Survey Satisficing of Online Panels in Japan’, Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Miura, Asako and Kobayashi, Tetsuro (2015b), ‘Monitors Are Not Monitored: How Satisficing among Online Survey Monitors Can Distort Empirical Findings’, Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (2): 120–127.Google Scholar
Miura, Asako and Kobayashi, Tetsuro (2016), ‘Survey Satisficing Inflates Stereotypical Responses in Online Experiment: The Case of Immigration Study’, Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 1563.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J (1993), ‘Public Opinion and Heuristic Processing of Source Cues’, Political Behavior, 15 (2): 167–192.Google Scholar
Neuman, Russel W., Just, Marion R., and Crigler, Ann N. (1992), Common Knowledge: News and the Constitution of Political Meaning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R. (1976), The Changing American Voter, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Daniel M., Meyvis, Tom, and Davidenko, Nicolas (2009), ‘Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4): 867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Timothy J. and Zucco, Cesar Jr. (2009), ‘Estimating Ideology of Brazilian Legislative Parties, 1990–2005: A Research Communication’, Latin American Research Review, 44 (1): 218–246.Google Scholar
Rucker, Derek D. and Petty, Richard E. (2006), ‘Increasing the Effectiveness of Communications to Consumers: Recommendations Based on Elaboration Likelihood and Attitude Certainty Perspectives’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25 (1): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David and Zucco, Cesar Jr. (2014), ‘The Power of Partisanship in Brazil: Evidence from Survey Experiments’, American Journal of Political Science, 58 (1): 212–225.Google Scholar
Satrori, Giovanni (2005), Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F. and Streb, Matthew J. (2002), ‘The Partisan Heuristic in Low-Information Elections’, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 66 (4): 559–581.Google Scholar
Skitka, Linda J. and Robideau, Renee (1997), ‘Judging a Book by its Cover: The Effects of Candidate Party Label and Issue Stands on Voting Behavior’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27 (11): 967–982.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. and Stiglitz, Edward H. (2012), The Reputational Premium: A Theory of Party Identification and Spatial Reasoning, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie J. (2008), ‘Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure’, Political Behavior, 30 (3): 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokuyama, Yoshio (2014), ‘Abe Kantei to Shimbun: “Nikyokuka Suru Houdou” no Kiki’ [The Abe government and the press: The crisis of polarizing news media], Tokyo: Shueisha.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kobayashi and Yokoyama supplementary material

Kobayashi and Yokoyama supplementary material 1

Download Kobayashi and Yokoyama supplementary material(File)
File 44.8 KB