Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:22:13.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis for the Characterization of Oxygen Implanted Silicon (SIMOX) by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

M.G. Doss
Affiliation:
Rudolph Research, Flanders, NJ 07836
D. Chandler-Horowitz
Affiliation:
NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
J. F. Marchiando
Affiliation:
NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
S. Krause
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
S. Seraphin
Affiliation:
(Visitserngtrakul), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Get access

Abstract

Samples of SIMOX have been prepared by implantation in a high-current implanter (density ≍ 1 mA/cm2) and by annealing at 1300°C for 6 hours. Transmission electron microscopy reveals unusual structure in these samples. Spectroscopic ellipsometry has been used to analyze these structures. Ellipsometric measurements were collected at an angle of incidence of 75. deg, with photon energies from 1.5 to 5.0 eV, and using a rotating polarizer configuration. The measurements were analyzed with three models: a three-layer model, a four-layer model, and a five-layer model. The five-layer model provided the best fit of the three. This model identified a layer of crystalline Si inclusions (“islands”) within the SiO2 layer. A method is presented that provides initial estimates for the thicknesses of the top three layers to help start the regression analysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contribution of National Institute of Standards and Technology; not subject to copyright.

References

REFERENCES

1. Ferrieu, F., Vu, D.P., D'Anterroches, C., and Oberlin, J.C., J. Appl. Phys. 62 (8), October 1987, pp.345861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Liang, Z. and Mo, D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 52 (13), March 1988, pp. 105052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Vanhellemont, J. and Maes, H.E., J. Appl. Phys. 65 (11), June 1989, pp. 445456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. McMarr, P.J. and Mrstik, B.J., J. Appl. Phys. 67 (12), June 1990, pp. 721122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Visitserngtrakul, S., Jung, C.O., Ravi, T.S., Cordts, B., Burke, D.E. and Krause, S.J., Inst.Phys.Conf.Ser.No.100: Section 7, 1989, p. 557.Google Scholar
6. Visitserngtrakul, S., Krause, S.J. and Cordts, B.F., J. Appl. Phys., 1991, to be published.Google Scholar
7. Visitserngtrakul, S., Barry, J. and Krause, S.J., MRS Proceedings 163, 1990, pp. 95560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rudolph Research Spectroscopic Ellipsometer and Linear Regression Software.Google Scholar
9. Marchiando, J.F., Semiconductor Measurement Technologyr A Software Program for Aiding the Analysis of Ellipsometric Measurements, Simple Spectroscopic Models, NIST Spec. Publ. 400-84, Natl.Inst. Stand. Technol. (U.S. Dept. of Commerce), April 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Aspnes, D.E., and Studna, A.A., Phys. Rev. B27, 1983, p. 985;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
see also Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited by Palik, E.D. (Academic, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
11. Simons, D. and Roitman, P. of NIST, private communications.Google Scholar
12. Douglas-Hamilton, D.H., Dolan, R.P. and Friedman, H.E., Nuclear Instr. and Methods in Phys. Res. B21 (1989), pp. 158162.Google Scholar
13. Albers, J., Semiconductor Measurement technology: Results of the Monte Carlo Calculation of One and Two-Dimensional Distributions of Particles and Damage: Ion Implanted Dopants in Silicon,NIST Spec. Publ. 400–79, Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. (U.S. Dept. of Commerce), Sept. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar