Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:02:01.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Microsensors for Satellite Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

B. H. Weiller ,
J. D. Barrie ,
K. A. Aitchison  and
P. D. Chaffee
B. H. Weiller
Affiliation:
The Aerospace Corporation, Mechanics and Materials Technology Center, PO Box 92957/M5-753, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2957
J. D. Barrie
Affiliation:
The Aerospace Corporation, Mechanics and Materials Technology Center, PO Box 92957/M5-753, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2957
K. A. Aitchison
Affiliation:
The Aerospace Corporation, Mechanics and Materials Technology Center, PO Box 92957/M5-753, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2957
P. D. Chaffee
Affiliation:
The Aerospace Corporation, Mechanics and Materials Technology Center, PO Box 92957/M5-753, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2957
Get access

Abstract

We have been investigating several chemical microsensor technologies for the detection of chemicals found in propellant and rocket exhaust plumes and as contaminants for satellite components. In this work we have developed a catalytic metal sensor for the detection of H2 contamination in electronic device packages. The sensor is based on the resistance of a thin film Pd/Ni alloy. Data have been obtained on its response at room temperature to various levels of H2 as well as the effects of H2O and O2 on its performance. Hydrogen levels to 10.5 ppm have been detected and the responsivity is about twice that of similar sensors. The sensor is insensitive to H2O but its response to H2 is strongly inhibited by O2.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 360 , 1994 , 535
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Hughes, R. C., Ricco, A. J., Butler, M. A., and Martin, S. J., Science, 254 74 (1991).Google Scholar
2) Grate, J. W., Rose-Pehrsson, S., Barger, W. R., Langmuir 4, 1293–1301 (1988); A. W. Snow, W. R. Barger, M. Klusty, H. Wohltjen and N. L. Jarvis, Langmuir, 2, 513-519 (1986)10.1021/la00084a015Google Scholar
3) Zakin, M.R., Bernstein, L. S. and Moody, R. A., JANNAF Safety and Environmental Protection Sub-Committee Meeting, 1990, p. 121–128, CPIA Publication #543.Google Scholar
4) Bowers, W. D., Chuan, R. L., and Duong, T. M., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 1624–1629 (1991)Google Scholar
5) Lundstrom, I. and Svensson, C., in “Solid State Chemical Sensors”, Janata, J. and Huber, R. J., eds, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1985.Google Scholar
6) Hughes, R. C. and Schubert, W. K., J. Appl. Phys. 71 542 (1992).Google Scholar
7) Camp, W. O., Lasater, R., Genova, V., and Hume, R., IEEE GaAs IC Symposium p. 203 (1989).Google Scholar
8) Schuesslar, P. and Feliciano-Welpe, D., Hybrid Circuit Technology, 8, 19–26 (1991).Google Scholar
9) Auer, W. and Grabke, H. J., Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 78, 58 (1974).Google Scholar
10) Hughes, R. C., Moreno, D. J., Jenkins, M. W., and Rodriquez, J. L., Solid-State Sensors and Actuators Workshop, 13- 16 June 1994, Hilton Head SC; report #SAND-94-0047C.Google Scholar