Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:22:01.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Resolution Tem Studies of Defects Near Si-SiO2 Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. H. Mazur
Affiliation:
Materials and Molecular Research DivisionLawrence Berkeley LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley, California 94720
J. Washburn
Affiliation:
Materials and Molecular Research DivisionLawrence Berkeley LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley, California 94720
Get access

Abstract

Small defects with habit parallel to {100} and {311} matrix planes were observed using high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HREM) within 100 nm from the Si-Si02 interfaces after one step oxidation in dry O2 at 900°C, 1000°C and 1150°C of Czochralski (CZ) grown [100] p type boron doped, 1.5 − 20 Ω cm Si wafers with concentrations of oxygen1.4 × 10 18cm−3 and carbon 4. − 10. × 10 16 cm−3.The defects were less than 10 nm wide and I nm thick. The {100} and {311} defect are interpreted tentatively as thin silica plateletes and {311} stacking faults respectively. Distribution of defects near the interface was random although their density appeared to be lower for higher oxidation temperatures. It is not yet clear whether the defects were formed during the oxidation treatments or were present near the surfaces of the asreceived wafers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Patel, J.R. in Semiconductor Silicon 1981, Huff, H.R., Kriegler, R.J., Takeishi, Y., Eds (The Electrochemical Society,Pennington, 1981) p.189.Google Scholar
2. Hu, S.M., J.Vac.Sci.Technol. 14, 17 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Tan, T.Y., Gardner, E.E., Tice, W.K., Appl.Phys.Lettl. 30, 175 (1977).Google Scholar
4. Tice, W.K., Tan, T.Y., Appl.Phys.Lett. 28, 564 (1976).Google Scholar
5. Patrick, W.J., Hu, S.M., Westdorp, W.A., J.Appl.Phys. 50, 1399 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Varker, C.J., Whitfield, J.D., Rao, K.V., Demer, J.J., in Ref.1, p.313.Google Scholar
7. Mazur, J.H., Gronsky, R., Washburn, J. in Inst.Phys.Conf.Ser.No.67(1983).Google Scholar
8. Desseaux-Thibault, J., Bourret, A., Pennisson, J.M., ibid.Google Scholar
9. Ponce, F.A., Hahn, S., Yamashita, T., Scot, M, Carruthers, J., ibid.Google Scholar
10. Tan, T.Y., Foell, H., Mader, S., Krakow, W., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 2, 179184, (1981).Google Scholar
11. Yamamoto, N., Petroff, P.M., Patel, J.R., J.Appl.Phys., 54, 3475 (1983).Google Scholar