Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:26:35.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variations in Magnetic Hyperfine fields for Thin Epitaxial Heterostructures Of (110)Fe ON (111)Ag

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

C. J. Gutierrez ,
S. H. Mayer ,
Z. Q. Qiu ,
H. Tang  and
J. C. Walker
C. J. Gutierrez
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
S. H. Mayer
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
Z. Q. Qiu
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
H. Tang
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
J. C. Walker
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
Get access

Abstract

We have made a study of magnetic heterostructures involving the epitaxial growth of (110)Fe on (111)Ag. The flatness and continuity of the films was verified by Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction during the growth process. A series of structures were made with very thin intervening silver layers with thicker iron layers. The doping of appropriate layers by enriched Fe57 made it possible to examine the magnetic structure of the iron films as a function of depth. Preliminary results indicate that thin layers of silver sandwiched between two very thin Fe layers are able to transmit conduction electron polarization, resulting in iron behavior which resembles that of bulk iron. Implications of these results for understanding the nature of the magnetization of iron will be addressed in the following.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 151: Symposium G – Growth, Characterization and Properties of Ultrathin Magnetic Films and Multilayers , 1989 , 17
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Snyman, H.C. and Olsen, G.H., J. Appl. Phys. 44, 888 (1973); G.H. Olsen and H.C. Snyman, Acta Metallurgica 21, 769 (1973).Google Scholar
2. Richter, R., Gay, J.G. and Smith, J.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2704 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Fu, C.L., Freeman, A.J. and Oguchi, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2700 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Walker, J.C., Droste, R., Stern, G. and Tyson, J., J. Appl. Phys. 55, 2500 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Tyson, J., Owens, A. and Walker, J.C., J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 35, 126 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Krebs, J.J., Jonker, B.T. and Prinz, G.A., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3744 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Tyson, J., Owens, A., Walker, J.C. and Bayreuther, G., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 2487 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Bayreuther, G. and Lugert, G., J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 35, 50 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Vincze, I. and Kollar, J., Phys. Rev. 6, 1066 (1972).Google Scholar
10. Mills, D.L. and Maradudin, A.A., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28, 1855 (1967).Google Scholar
11. Mathon, J., Phys. Rev. B24, 6588 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Gutierrez, C.J., Mayer, S.H. and Walker, J.C., J. Magn. Magn. Mat. (in press)Google Scholar
13. Rado, G.T., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 2, 127 (1957).Google Scholar
14. Korecki, J. and Gradmann, U., Eur. Lett. 2, 651 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Qiu, Z.Q., Tang, H., Du, Y.W., Stern, G.P. and Walker, J.C., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 3657 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Swiatek, P., Saurenbach, F., Pang, Y., Grunberg, P. and Zinn, W., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3753 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar