Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:08:42.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fly Ashes Used For Blended Portland Cement: Effect Of Grinding on Cement Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Erik Stoltenberg-Hansson
Erik Stoltenberg-Hansson*
Affiliation:
Norcem A.S, N-3950 Brevik, Norway
Get access

Abstract

Tests have been performed with Class F fly ashes used for the production of interground 20% fly ash cement. Unground and ground fly ashes were mixed with a reference high fineness Portland cement and tested for strength in mortar (ISO/CEN method). The fly ashes were also tested for chemical composition, bulk density and specific gravity, fineness (Blaine) and particle size distribution (laser method). There are considerable variations in the specific weights of the asdelivered fly ashes. It is shown that even a small amount of grinding increases the specific gravity significantly, and improves and homogenizes the particle size distributions, resulting in higher strength. The strength increase corresponds to the decrease in air void content.

Intergrinding of fly ash and clinker in large scale mills reduces the power consumption, giving the same 28-day strength as mixed fly ash cement with higher fineness.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 136: Symposium O – Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products V , 1988 , 175
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stoltenberg-Hansson, E., Rock Products 4, 87 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Stoltenberg-Hansson, E., Zement-Kalk-Gips 38., 609 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Osbaeck, B., in Effects of Fly Ash Incorporation in Cement and Concrete, edited by Diamond, S. (Mat. Res. Soc., University Park, 1981) pp. 280–288.Google Scholar
4. Osbaeck, B., Cem. Cone. Res. 15, 53–64 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Stoltenberg-Hansson, E., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P. and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. Vol.65 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986) pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
6. Dhir, R.K., et al Cement and Conc. Res. 18. 277 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Berry, E.E. and Malhotra, V.M., Fly Ash in Concrete, (CANMET, Ottawa, Ont., Feb. 1986).Google Scholar
8. Sybertz, F., Betongwerk und Fertigeil-Technik, 1/1988, pp. 42–47 and 2/1988 pp. 80–88.Google Scholar
9. Bernshausen, H., World Cement, June 1988, pp. 250–255.Google Scholar
10. Jensen, S.A., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P. and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. Vol.65 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986) pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
11. Norwegian Standard, NS 3098, Portland Cements. Specification of Properties, Sampling and Delivery. Norges Standardiseringsforbund, May 1983.Google Scholar
12. Norwegian Standard, NS 3049. Norges Standardiseringsforbund, January 1970.Google Scholar