Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:35:07.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Ionic Strength on the Stability of Colloids Released from Injection Grout Silica Sol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Pirkko L Holtta
Affiliation:
pirkko.holtta@helsinki.fi, University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland
Mari Lahtinen
Affiliation:
mari.lahtinen@helsinki.fi, University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, Helsinki, Finland
Martti Hakanen
Affiliation:
martti.hakanen@helsinki.fi, University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland
Jukka Lehto
Affiliation:
jukka.lehto@helsinki.fi, University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland
Piia Juhola
Affiliation:
piia.juhola@posiva.fi, Posiva Oy, Eurajoki, Finland
Get access

Abstract

In Olkiluoto Finland colloidal silica called silica sol (EKA Chemicals) will be used as a non-cementitious grout for the sealing of fractures of the hydraulic apertures of 0.05 mm or less. The use of colloidal material has to be considered in the long-term safety assessment of a spent nuclear fuel repository. The potential relevance of colloid-mediated radionuclide transport is highly dependent on their stability in different geochemical environments. Objective of this work was to study the effect of ionic strength on stability of silica colloids released from silica gel. Silica gel samples were stored in contact with NaCl and CaCl2 electrolyte solutions and in deionized water. Colloid release and stability were followed for two years by taking the samples after one month and then twice in a year. The release and stability of colloids were followed by measuring particle size, colloidal silica concentrations and zeta potential. The particle size distributions were determined applying the dynamic light scattering (DLS) method and zeta potential based on dynamic electrophoretic mobility.

In dilute NaCl (10-7–10-2 M) and CaCl2 (3 10-7– 3 10-3 M) solutions, a mean colloid diameter was less than 100 nm and high negative zeta potential values suggests the existence of stable silica colloids. After two years, the mean particle diameter was increased but it was still less than 500 nm and absolute value of zeta potential was decreased. In 0.1–1 M NaCl and 0.03–3 M CaCl2 solutions, wide particle size distribution and zeta potential values around zero suggested particle aggregation and instable colloids. In deionized water, particle size remained rather stable and zeta potential remained high negative suggests stable silica colloids. The threshold value of ionic strength was 0.03–0.1 M when salinity had an effect on the stability of colloids. In Olkiluoto, the ionic strength of saline groundwater is order of magnitude higher than the range of effect value obtained in this study. Under the prevailing conditions in Olkiluoto, silica colloids are instable, but the possible influence of glacial melt waters has to be considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 EKA Chemicals, Eka gel MEYCO MP320 http://www.colloidalsilica.com/eka.asp asp.Google Scholar
2 Boden, A. and Sievänen, U., SKB R–05–40/Posiva WR 2005–24 (2005).Google Scholar
3 Torstenfelt, B., Jansson, M. and Atienza, M., SKB Arbetsrapport TU–05–04 (2005).Google Scholar
4 Kersting, A. B., Efurd, D. W., Finnegan, D. L., Rokop, D. J., Smith, D. K. and Thompson, J. L., Nature 397, 56 (1999).Google Scholar
5 Novikov, A. P., Kalmykov, S. N., Utsunomiya, S., Ewing, R. C., Horreard, F., Merkulov, A., Clark, S. B., Tkachev, V. V. and Myasoedov, B. F., Science 314, 638 (2006).Google Scholar
6 Puls, R. W. and Powell, R. M., Environ. Sci. Technol. 26, 614 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Vilks, P. and Baik, M., J. Contam. Hydrol. 47, 197 (2001).Google Scholar
8 Yamaguchi, T., Nakayama, S., Vandergraaf, T. T., Drew, D. J. and Vilks, P., J. Power and Energy Systems 2, 186 (2008).Google Scholar
9 Vuorinen, U. and Hirvonen, H., Posiva WR–2005–03 (2005).Google Scholar
10 Takala, M. and Manninen, P., Posiva WR–2006–98 (2006).Google Scholar
11 Hölttä, P., Hakanen, M., Lahtinen, M., Leskinen, A., Lehto, J. and Juhola, P., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXII, edited by Rebak, R.B., Hyatt, N.C. and Pickett, D.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Volume 1124, Warrendale, PA, 2009) 525530.Google Scholar
12 Hölttä, P., Lahtinen, M., Hakanen, M., Lehto, J. and Juhola, P., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXIII, edited by Burakov, B.E. and Alloy, A. S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Volume 1193, Warrendale, PA, 2009) 437–434.Google Scholar
13 Iler, R. K., The Chemistry of Silica, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1979).Google Scholar
14 Malvern Instruments Ltd., http://www.malvern.co.uk/LabEng/industry/colloids/colloids_home.htm htm.Google Scholar
15 Filella, M., Zhang, J., Newman, M. E. and Buffle, J., Colloids Surf. A 120, 27 (1997).Google Scholar