Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:47:01.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shock (Blast) Mitigation by “Soft” Condensed Matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Vitali F. Nesterenko
Vitali F. Nesterenko*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

It is a common point that “soft” condensed matter (like granular materials or foams) can reduce damage caused by impact or explosion. It is attributed to their ability to absorb significant energy. This is certainly the case for quasistatic type of deformation at low velocity of impact widely used for packing of fragile devices. At the same time a mitigation of blast phenomena must take into account shock wave properties of “soft” matter which very often exhibit highly nonlinear, highly heterogeneous and dissipative behavior. This paper considers applications of “soft” condensed matter for blast mitigation using simplified approach, presents analysis of some anomalous effects and suggestions for future research in this exciting area.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 759: Symposium MM – Granular Material-Based Technologies , 2002 , MM4.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nesterenko, V.F., Dynamics of Heterogeneous Materials, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
2. Smith, P.D. and Hetherington, J.G., Blast and Ballistic Loading of Structures, Butterwoth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
3. Baker, W.E., J. Applied Mechanics, Transactions of the ASME, March, 139 (1960).Google Scholar
4. Demchuk, A.F., J. of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 9, 558 (1968).Google Scholar
5. Rao, S.S., Mechanical Vibrations, 3rd edition, Addison-Wesley, Inc., 1995.Google Scholar
6. Raspet, R., Butler, P. B., and Jahani, F., Applied Acoustics, 22, 243 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Benson, D.J., and Nesterenko, V.F., J. Appl. Phys. 89, 3622 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Nesterenko, V.F., in Granular State, edited by Sen, S. and Hunt, M.L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 627, Warrendale, PA, 2001) pp. BB3.1.1–3.1.12.Google Scholar
9. Manciu, M., Sen, S., and Hurd, A.J., Physica D, 157, 226 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Sen, S., see paper in this Proceedings.Google Scholar
11. Hanssen, A.G., Enstock, L., and Langseth, M., Int. J. Impact Engineering. 27, 593 (2002).Google Scholar
12. Grigoriev, G.S., Klapovskii, V.E., Koren'kov, V.E., Mineev, V.N., and Shakhirdzhanov, E.S., Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, July, 98 (1987).Google Scholar