Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:10:08.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NMR and Quantum Effects in Metal Particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

W. P. Halperin
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Department of Physics and Astronomy and Materials Research Laboratory, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Insuk Yu
Affiliation:
Seoul National University, Department of Physics, Seoul 151, Korea
Get access

Abstract

The considerable interest in metallic clusters spans a wide range. In this paper we discuss quantum effects and we suggest that there may be important interrelationships between such behavior and heterogeneous catalysis. Of course, the physical and chemical behavior of the metal particle are the key to understanding principles of catalytic activity. The quantum effects are found at progressively lower temperatures where the metallic properties change. In both cases a fundamental question is posed, “Do these particles exhibit metallic behavior?;” One of the common features of research in these two areas is the important role played by nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR) techniques since the signatures of a metal and an insulator are so dramatically different. The issue of metallic or nonmetallic behavior is therefore best addressed with this experimental approach and we will review the current situation by comparing a number of results on quantum size effects deduced from NMR experiments

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Halperin, W.P., Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 533 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Fröhlich, H., Physica(Utrecht) 4, 406 1937).Google Scholar
3. Greenwood, D.A., Brout, R., and Krumhansl, J.A., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 5, 297 (1960).Google Scholar
4. Kimura, K., Bandow, S., and Sako, S., Surf. Sci. 156, 883 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Kubo, R., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 17, 975 (1962).Google Scholar
6..Sone, J., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 42, 1457 1977).Google Scholar
7..Yee, P. and Knight, W.D., Phys. Rev. B 11, 3261 (1975).Google Scholar
8. Kobayashi, S., J. Phys. (Paris) Colloq. 38,C2121 (1977).Google Scholar
9. Fukugawa, Y., Kobayashi, S., and Sasaki, W., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 1095 (1982); K. Nomura, S. Kobayashi, and W. Sasaki, J.Phys. Soc. Jpn. 48,37 (1980);S. Kobayashi, in Proceedings of the 13th Inter. Conf. on Low Temp. Phys., Univ. Colorado, edited by K.D. Timmerhaus, W.J. O'Sullivan, and E.F. Hammel (Plenum, New York) 4 315 1974);F. Wright Jr., Phys. Rev, 163 420 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Yu, I., Gibson, A.A.V., Hunt, E.R., and Halperin, W.P., Phys. Rev.Lett. 44, 348 (1980); I. Yu and W.P. Halperin, J. Low Temp. Phys. 45., 189 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Rudaz, S.L., Ansermet, J.-P.,Wang, P.-K., Slichter, C.P., and Sinfelt, J. H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 71 (1985); C.D. Makowka, C.P. Slichter, and J.H. Sinfelt, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5663 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar