Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T07:04:59.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why is there a discrepancy between laboratory test results and real-world efficacy of continuously active quaternary ammonium disinfectants?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2024

Jennifer L. Cadnum
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Samir Memic
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Annette L. Jencson
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Curtis J. Donskey*
Affiliation:
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
*
Corresponding author: Curtis J. Donskey; Email: Curtis.Donskey@va.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Creative Commons
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
Copyright
© Department of Veterans Affairs, 2024

To the Editor—Continuously active quaternary ammonium disinfectants containing polymer coatings that bind to surfaces have been developed to provide persistent antimicrobial activity between episodes of cleaning. Reference Donskey1,Reference Redmond, Cadnum and Silva2 Environmental protection agency (EPA) registration as a disinfectant with 24-hour residual antimicrobial activity requires demonstration of a 5-log reduction in bacteria and/or a 3-log reduction in viruses within 10 minutes after 12 cycles of alternating wet and dry abrasions intended to simulate routine contacts that might occur between cleaning episodes. Reference Donskey1,3,4 A product registered with the EPA as Firebird F130 (Microban Products, Huntersville, NC) and previously marketed by Professional Disposables International as Sani-24 has demonstrated residual activity against several bacterial pathogens and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Reference Donskey1,Reference Rutala, Ikner, Donskey, Weber and Gerba5 However, real-world assessments of these products have yielded mixed results. Reference Donskey1 In a recent randomized trial, a continuously active disinfectant significantly reduced total bioburden and recovery of clinically important pathogens, Reference Warren, Barrett, Graves, King, Turner and Anderson6 whereas no significant reductions occurred in another randomized trial. Reference Nadimpalli, Johnson, Magder, Haririan, Stevens, Harris and O’Hara7

Why might there be a discrepancy between laboratory results and real-world efficacy of continuously active quaternary ammonium disinfectants? It is possible that the coatings may sometimes be removed in real-world settings as the products are easily removed by disinfectant or nondisinfectant wipes. Reference Donskey1,Reference Calfee, Ryan and Abdel-Hady8 The artificial methods used for laboratory testing may also exaggerate the potential for efficacy in real-world settings (ie, organisms deposited in a liquid inoculum during laboratory testing may be reduced more than organisms deposited without moisture in clinical settings). Reference Donskey1,Reference McDonald, Wesgate, Rubiano, Holah, Denyer, Jermann and Maillard9

Another factor that could affect real-world efficacy is variation in the amount of continuously active quaternary ammonium disinfectant applied to surfaces. For Firebird F130/Sani-24, the EPA registration (no. 42182-9) for residual disinfection indicates that sufficient product must be applied to ensure thorough wetness with 1 minute of wet contact time. It is plausible that insufficient product might be applied in real-world settings. The product may dry quickly on surfaces because it contains 68.6% ethanol and might require reapplication to achieve 1 minute of wet contact time. Therefore, we compared the amount of product applied using Sani-24 Germicidal Spray and presaturated Sani-24 Germicidal Wipes with different wiping methods and tested for activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Sani-24 was applied to overbed tables using 5 methods: (1) spraying with Sani-24 Germicidal Spray following the manufacturer’s recommendation (ie, 3 sprays at 15 cm) providing ∼120 seconds of wet contact time, (2) wiping with 1 Sani-24 Germicidal Wipe with 2 passes over the surface providing ∼60 seconds of contact time, (3) wiping with 1 Sani-24 Germicidal Wipe with 1 pass over the surface providing ∼30 seconds contact time, (4) wiping with 2 Sani-24 Germicidal Wipes to thoroughly wet the surface providing ∼120-seconds contact time, and (5) and wiping with 1 Sani-24 Germicidal Wipe that had first been applied to a 1.2 m Reference Redmond, Cadnum and Silva2 surface area resulting in reduced product application providing ∼10 seconds contact time. For each method, the product was allowed to dry overnight before testing. The spray and 2-wipe applications left a palpable sticky residue on the surface.

A bromophenol blue colorimetric assay was used to assess the presence of quaternary ammonium on the surfaces ∼24 hours after application. Reference Donskey1,Reference Burel, Direur, Rivas and Purevdorj-Gage10 Bromophenol blue solutions turn from purple to blue when complexed with quaternary ammonium compounds. A color change has been correlated with a >99.9% reduction in Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella aerogenes. Reference Burel, Direur, Rivas and Purevdorj-Gage10 The supplemental material shows a bromophenol blue standard curve.

To assess antimicrobial activity on the surfaces, 6 log10 of MRSA in 10 µL phosphate-buffered saline was inoculated onto treated surfaces. After 1 and 10 minutes of contact time, the surfaces were sampled with cotton swabs premoistened in Dey-Engley neutralizer and plated onto selective media for enumeration. Reductions were calculated in comparison to untreated control surfaces.

As shown in Figure 1.A, bromophenol blue solution turned from purple to blue with the spray and 2-wipe application, and the swab tip turned blue for the 1 wipe with 60 seconds contact time application. No blue color was detected for the 1 wipe with 30 second contact time and the used wipe applications. MRSA was reduced by ≥5.9 log10 with the spray and 2-wipe applications, but only by ∼1–2 log10 when applied with a single wipe with 1–2 passes over the surface (Fig. 1B). No substantial reduction in MRSA occurred when a single wipe was applied after first wiping a 1.2 m Reference Redmond, Cadnum and Silva2 surface.

Figure 1. Detection of residual quaternary ammonium disinfectant on surfaces based on a bromophenol blue colorimetric assay (A) and reduction in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) inoculated onto the surface with 1 or 10 minutes of contact time (B). Seconds in parentheses indicate wet contact time of the disinfectants prior to drying. Change from purple to blue indicates detection of quaternary ammonium compound. s, second; CFU, colony-forming unit.

Our findings demonstrate that the amount of continuously active quaternary ammonium disinfectant detected on surfaces can vary considerably with different methods of application. Application as a spray or wipe with sufficient product to provide ∼120 seconds of wet contact time provided optimal activity but may not be practical in some settings if a residue is left on surfaces. Quaternary ammonium disinfectant was only detected on surfaces with 60 seconds or longer contact time. A single wipe passed over the surface twice to provide ∼60 seconds wet contact time resulted in a 2 log10 reduction in MRSA, but ≤1 log10 reductions occurred on surfaces with wet contact time of ≤30 seconds.

In summary, the method of application of continuously active quaternary ammonium disinfectants could substantially impact results in real-world settings. Our findings reinforce the manufacturer’s recommendation that sufficient product must be applied to provide at least 60 seconds of wet contact time. Bromophenol blue testing could be a useful tool to assess the adequacy of product application.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.15

Acknowledgments

We thank the Professional Disposables International for providing the products used for testing.

Financial support

This work was supported by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs.

Competing interests

C.J.D. has received research grants from Clorox, Pfizer, and Ecolab. All other authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Donskey, CJ. Continuous surface and air decontamination technologies: current concepts and controversies. Am J Infect Control 2023;51 suppl 11:A144A150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redmond, SN, Cadnum, JL, Silva, SY, et al. Evaluation of a continuously active disinfectant for decontamination of portable medical equipment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43:387389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guidance for products adding residual efficacy claims. US Environmental Protection Agency website. https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/guidance-products-adding-residual-efficacy-claims. Accessed November 1, 2023.Google Scholar
Protocol for residual self-sanitizing activity of dried chemical residues on hard, nonporous surfaces. Protocol #01-1A. US Environmental Protection Agency website. https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/protocol-residual-self-sanitizing-activity-dried-chemical-residues-hard-non. Published 2015. Accessed November 1, 2023.Google Scholar
Rutala, WA, Ikner, LA, Donskey, CJ, Weber, DJ, Gerba, CP. Continuously active disinfectant inactivates severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and human coronavirus 229E two days after the disinfectant was applied and following wear exposures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023;44:507509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, BG, Barrett, A, Graves, A, King, C, Turner, NA, Anderson, DJ. An enhanced strategy for daily disinfection in acute care hospital rooms: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2242131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadimpalli, G, Johnson, JK, Magder, LS, Haririan, A, Stevens, D, Harris, AD, O’Hara, LM. Efficacy of a continuously active disinfectant wipe on the environmental bioburden in the intensive care unit: a randomized controlled study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44:20362043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calfee, MW, Ryan, SP, Abdel-Hady, A, et al. Virucidal efficacy of antimicrobial surface coatings against the enveloped bacteriophage Φ6. J Appl Microbiol 2022;132:18131824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, M, Wesgate, R, Rubiano, M, Holah, J, Denyer, SP, Jermann, C, Maillard, JY. Impact of a dry inoculum deposition on the efficacy of copper-based antimicrobial surfaces. J Hosp Infect 2020;106:465472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burel, C, Direur, G, Rivas, C, Purevdorj-Gage, L. Colorimetric detection of residual quaternary ammonium compounds on dry surfaces and prediction of antimicrobial activity using bromophenol blue. Lett Appl Microbiol 2021;72:358365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Detection of residual quaternary ammonium disinfectant on surfaces based on a bromophenol blue colorimetric assay (A) and reduction in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) inoculated onto the surface with 1 or 10 minutes of contact time (B). Seconds in parentheses indicate wet contact time of the disinfectants prior to drying. Change from purple to blue indicates detection of quaternary ammonium compound. s, second; CFU, colony-forming unit.

Supplementary material: File

Cadnum et al. supplementary material

Cadnum et al. supplementary material
Download Cadnum et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.5 MB