Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-7262s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-12T02:14:51.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why is there a discrepancy between laboratory test results and real-world efficacy of continuously active quaternary ammonium disinfectants?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2024

Jennifer L. Cadnum
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Samir Memic
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Annette L. Jencson
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Curtis J. Donskey*
Affiliation:
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
*
Corresponding author: Curtis J. Donskey; Email: Curtis.Donskey@va.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information

Type
Letter to the Editor
Creative Commons
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
Copyright
© Department of Veterans Affairs, 2024
Figure 0

Figure 1. Detection of residual quaternary ammonium disinfectant on surfaces based on a bromophenol blue colorimetric assay (A) and reduction in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) inoculated onto the surface with 1 or 10 minutes of contact time (B). Seconds in parentheses indicate wet contact time of the disinfectants prior to drying. Change from purple to blue indicates detection of quaternary ammonium compound. s, second; CFU, colony-forming unit.

Supplementary material: File

Cadnum et al. supplementary material

Cadnum et al. supplementary material
Download Cadnum et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.5 MB