Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:54:40.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Site-specific to Site-responsive: Sound art performances as participatory milieu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2017

Lauren Hayes
Lauren Hayes*
Affiliation:
School of Arts, Media and Engineering, Arizona State University, Stauffer B, 950 S Forest Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
*
Email: laurensarahhayes@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article concerns context-based live electronic music, specifically performances which occur in response to a particular location or space. I outline a set of practices which can be more accurately described as site-responsive, rather than site-specific. I develop a methodological framework for site-responsive live electronic music in three stages. First, I discuss the ambiguity of the term site-specific by drawing on its origins within the visual arts and providing examples of how it has been used within sound art. I then suggest that site-responsive performance might be a more helpful way of describing this type of activity. I argue that it affords an opportunity for music to mediate the social, drawing on Small’s idea of music as sets of third-order relationships, and Bourriaud’s relational aesthetics. Third, I suggest that with the current renewed trend for performances occurring outside of cultural institutions, it is important to be mindful of the identity of a particular site, and those who have a cultural connection to it. I make reference to a series of works within my own creative practice which have explored these ideas.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 22 , Special Issue 1: Context-based Composition , April 2017 , pp. 83 - 92
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aitchison, B. 2005. Collaboration with Location. Dramaturgy Forum. www.billaitchison.co.uk/billaitchison/site-sensitive.html (accessed 13 May 2016).Google Scholar
Amirkhanian, C. 2001. Charles Amirkhanian Interviews Henry Brant. www.otherminds.org/shtml/Brantinterview.shtml (accessed 13 May 2016).Google Scholar
Bishop, C. 2004. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics. October 110: 51–80.Google Scholar
Blesser, B. and Salter, L.-R. 2007. Spaces Speak, Are You Listening? Experiencing Aural Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Born, G. 2015. After Relational Aesthetics: Improvised musics, the social, and (re)theorising the aesthetic. In G. Born, E. Lewis and W. Straw (eds.) Improvisation and Social Aesthetics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 2017.Google Scholar
Bourriaud, N. 1998. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les presses du réel, (English trans. 2002).Google Scholar
Bowers, J. 2003. Improvising Machines: Ethnographically Informed Design for Improvised Electro-acoustic Music. ARiADAtexts 4. http://soundartarchive.net/articles/bowers-improvising_machines.pdf (accessed 13 May 2016).Google Scholar
Cooper, I. 2009. Being Situated in Recent Art: From the ‘Extended Situation’ to ‘Relational Aesthetics’. Janus Head 11: 333–343.Google Scholar
Cox, C. 2011. Beyond Representation and Signification: Toward a Sonic Materialism. Journal of Visual Culture 10(2): 145–161.Google Scholar
Davis, T. 2011. Towards a Relational Understanding of the Performance Ecosystem. Organised Sound 16(2): 120–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dombois, F. and Eckel, G. 2012. Mind the Gap: Contextual Information. Research Catalogue. www.researchcatalogue.net/view/33841/37720 (accessed 13 May 2016).Google Scholar
Hayes, L. 2013. Haptic Augmentation of the Hybrid Piano. Contemporary Music Review 32(5): 499–509.Google Scholar
Hayes, L. 2015. Enacting Musical Worlds: Common Approaches to using NIMEs within Performance and Person-Centred Arts Practices. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Baton Rouge, LA, 31 May–3 June.Google Scholar
Hogg, B. 2013. The Violin, the River, and Me: Artistic Research and Environmental Epistemology in Balancing String and Devil’s Water 1, Two Recent Environmental Sound Projects. Hz. www.hz-journal.org/n18/hogg.html (accessed 13 May 2016).Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2007. Against Soundscape. In A. Carlyle (ed.) Autumn Leaves: Sound and the Environment in Artistic Practice. Paris: Association Double-Entendre.Google Scholar
Kaye, N. 2000. Site-Specific Art: Performance, Place and Documentation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kwon, M. 2004. One Place after Another: Notes on site specificity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
LaBelle, B. 2006. Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ouzounian, G. 2013. Sound Installation Art: From Spatial Poetics to Politics. In G. Born (ed.) Music, Sound and Space: Transformations of Public and Private Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roads, C. 1993. Musical Sound Transformation by Convolution. In S. Ohteru (ed.) Proceedings of the 1993 International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco: International Computer Music Association.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, M., Wanderley, M. and Ferreira-Lopes, P. 2013. Intonaspacio: A Digital Musical Instrument for Exploring Site-Specificities in Sound. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Music Multidisciplinary Research – Sound, Music and Motion. Marseille, France: CMMR.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F. and Rebelo, P. 2009. The Pontydian Performance: The Performative Layer. Organised Sound 14(2): 134–141.Google Scholar
Small, C. 1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Stefani, E. and Lauke, K. 2010. Music, Space and Theatre: Site-specific Approaches to Multichannel Spatialisation. Organised Sound 15(3): 251–259.Google Scholar
Voegelin, S. 2014. Sonic Possible Worlds: Hearing the Continuum of Sound. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 2014. Cairn. Landscape Quartet. https://landscapequartet.org/2014/04/28/cairn/ (accessed 13 May 2016).Google Scholar
Waters, S. 2011. Editorial: Performance Ecosystems. Organised Sound 16(2): 95–96.Google Scholar

Discography

Brant, H. 2006. Mass in Gregorian Chant for Multiple Flutes (1984). On Henry Brant: Music for Massed Flutes. New York: New World Records, 80636.Google Scholar
Lucier, A. 1969. I Am Sitting in a Room (1993). New York: Lovely Music, Ltd., LCD 1013.Google Scholar
Satie, E. 1917. Musique d’Ameublement (2015). On Tout Satie! Paris: Warner Classics, UPC, 825646047963.Google Scholar
Varèse, E. 1998. Poème électroniqe. (1958). On The Complete Works. London: Decca, B00000AFR8.Google Scholar

Hayes supplementary material

Video 1

Download Hayes supplementary material(Video)
Video 34.2 MB

Hayes supplementary material

Video 2

Download Hayes supplementary material(Video)
Video 5.9 MB

Hayes supplementary material

Video 3

Download Hayes supplementary material(Video)
Video 47.4 MB

Hayes supplementary material

Audio

Download Hayes supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 21.4 MB