Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T21:41:33.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Passivated Copper Gates For Thin Film Silicon Transistors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

H. Sirringhaus
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
S.D. Theiss
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
A. Kahn
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
S. Wagner
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
Get access

Abstract

A solution to the thin film silicon transistor gate metallization problem in active matrix liquid crystal displays is demonstrated in the form of a self-passivation process for copper. Bottom-level copper (Cu) lines are passivated by a self-aligned CrOx encapsulation formed by surface segregation of chromium (Cr) from dilute Cu1-xCrx alloys (x=0.1–2.3) at 400°C. The encapsulation is an efficient barrier for Cu diffusion into the SiNx gate insulator during the plasma deposition and transistor processing, and solves the problems of oxidation and adhesion to the glass substrate. Gate line resistivities are 4.5 to 7.5μΩcm depending on the initial Cr concentration. The performance of self-passivated Cu-gate thin film transistors is comparable to that of transistors with refractory metal gates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Howard, W. E., Journal of the Society for Information Display (SID) 3/3, p. 127 (1995).Google Scholar
2 Dohjo, M., et al. 1993 SID Intl. Symp. Digest Tech. Papers, p.731 (1993).Google Scholar
3 Fryer, P. M. et al., 1996 SID Intl. Symp. Digest Tech. Papers, p.333 (1996).Google Scholar
4 Li, J., and Mayer, J. W., Mat. Res. Soc. Bulletin, Vol. XVIII, June 1993, p.52 (1993).Google Scholar
5 Adams, D., Alford, T. L., Theodore, N. D., Russell, S. W., Spreitzer, R. L., and Mayer, J. W., Thin Solid Films 262, p.199 (1995).Google Scholar
6 Gupta, M., Rathi, V. K., Thangaraj, R., Agnithori, O.P., and Chari, K. S., Thin Solid Films 204, p.77 (1991).Google Scholar
7 Zhong, Q., Inniss, D., Kjoller, K., and Elings, V. B., Surf. Sci. Lett. 290, p. L668 (1993).Google Scholar
8 Powell, M. J., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 36, p.2753 (1989).Google Scholar
9 Li, J., and Mayer, J. W., J. Appl. Phys. 70, p. 2820 (1991).Google Scholar
10 Chen, C., and Kanicki, J., IEEE Electron Device Letters 17, p.437, (1996).Google Scholar
11 Sirringhaus, H., Theiss, S. D., Kahn, A., and Wagner, S., to be published.Google Scholar