Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-6mz5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T19:34:24.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the relationship between neck length and bond radius during compression of snow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

R. L. Brown
Affiliation:
Civil and Applied Engineering Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59715 U.S.A.
M. Q. Edens
Affiliation:
Civil and Applied Engineering Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59715 U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an earlier study on the variations in micro-structure during large volumetric deformations of snow, the authors observed that, contrary to expectations, the length of necked regions connecting adjacent grains did not necessarily decrease during compression. Rather, there was no discernible or predictable change in neck length, in some cases increasing and in others decreasing. Further evaluations of the data and an analysis of the mechanics of neck deformation determined that the process is complicated by three different effects: (1) increase in coordination number (number of bonds per grain), (ii) plastic deformation of the neck, and (iii) a geometric effect determined by bond growth and grain geometry. It is found that the first two effects tend to decrease the neck length and that the third produces an increase in mean neck length. A set of coupled differential equations is developed describing the variation of neck length and bond radius, and solved numerically for conditions consistent with the experimental data. Calculated results agree well with the data for the bond radius but the results for the neck length are less satisfactory. Reasons for this lie with difficulty in making accurate measurements of mean neck length from two-dimensional surface-section data and in the criteria for the definition of necks.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1991
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic of neck and bond as they appear in a surface section.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Relationship between ratio of three-dimensional bond radius to initial three-dimensional bond radius and density change divided by initial density. The vertical lines represent the total range of the data scatter. The cubic least-squares fit represented by the curve had a standard error SR = 0.025.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Three-dimensional coordination number, N3, vs density. The vertical lines represent the total range of the data scatter. The curve is a cubic least-squares fit to the data with a standard error of SN = 0.120.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Schematic of the geometric effect which produces a change in neck length due to an increase, in bond radius.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. A typical surface section of snow samples used in this study. Note that this snow has no faceting, indicating long-term storage under uniform temperature conditions.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Comparison of theory with data for variation of three-dimensional bond radius R3 with density change

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Comparison of theory with test results for variation of neck length, with densification. Vertical lines represent total range of data scatter. The vertical bars represent the total data scatter.