Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:27:18.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rhyme, language, and children's reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Peter Bryant ,
Morag Maclean  and
Lynette Bradley
Peter Bryant*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Morag Maclean
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Lynette Bradley
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
*
Peter Bryant, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been shown that there is a strong relation between children's phonological skills and the progress that they make in reading. But there is some uncertainty whether this is a specific connection or whether it is just a byproduct of variations in general language ability. We report evidence from a longitudinal study showing that the relation between children's sensitivity to rhyme and alliteration and their success in reading is highly specific and cannot be accounted for in terms of general language ability. In this study measures were taken of a group of children's linguistic and metalinguistic skills when they were 3 and 4 years old. The linguistic measures were of the children's vocabulary, their receptive and expressive use of grammar, and their ability to imitate sentences. The metalinguistic measures were of their ability to detect rhyme and alliteration and of their awareness of syntax. Two to three years later, when the children were 6;7, we measured their progress in reading and spelling. The children's rhyme and alliteration scores were related to their reading two years later even after controls for differences in linguistic skills and also for differences in intelligence and in social background. The other metalinguistic task – syntax awareness – did not predict reading after these controls. Awareness of rhyme, we argue, makes a distinctive contribution to reading by helping children to form spelling categories.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 237 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowey, J. A., & Patel, R. K. (1988). Metalinguistic ability and early reading achievement. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 367–383.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read – A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–521.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. I.A.R.L.D. Monographs, 1. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L., & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection and learning to read. Developmental Psychology (in press).Google Scholar
Chukovsky, K. (1963). From two to five. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowker, A. (1989). Rhymes and alliteration in poems elicited from young children. Journal of Child Language, 16, 181–202.Google Scholar
Ellis, N., & Large, B. (1987). The development of reading: As you seek so shall you find. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73–83.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (1988). Children's use of analogy in learning to spell. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 21–33.Google Scholar
Jorm, A. R, Share, D. L., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Phonological confusability in short term memory for sentences as a predictor of reading ability. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 393–400.Google Scholar
Kirtley, C., Bryant, P., MacLean, M., & Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime and the onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 224–245.Google Scholar
Lenel, J. C., & Cantor, J. H. (1981). Rhyme recognition and phonemic perception in young children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 57–68.Google Scholar
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.Google Scholar
MacLean, M., Bryant, P. E., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 255–282.Google Scholar
Reynell, J. K. (1983). Developmental Language Scales. East Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. R. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness of kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175–190.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161–181.Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E., Nesdale, A. R., & Wright, A. D. (1987). Syntactic awareness and reading acquisition. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 25–34.Google Scholar
Wise, B. W., Olson, D. K., & Treiman, R. (1990). Subsyllabic units as aids in beginning readers' word learning: Onset-rime versus post-vowel segmentation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (in press).Google Scholar