Book contents
- Family and Christian Ethics
- New Studies in Christian Ethics
- Family and Christian Ethics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- General Editor’s Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Prologue The Difficult Question of What Family Is About
- Chapter 1 Family as Mystery
- Chapter 2 The Family Tie as Mystery
- Chapter 3 Family and Givenness as Mystery
- Chapter 4 Family and Dependence as Mystery
- Epilogue Morality of Appeal and Answer
- Bibliography
- Index
- Titles published in the series (continued from page iii)
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2023
Book contents
- Family and Christian Ethics
- New Studies in Christian Ethics
- Family and Christian Ethics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- General Editor’s Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Prologue The Difficult Question of What Family Is About
- Chapter 1 Family as Mystery
- Chapter 2 The Family Tie as Mystery
- Chapter 3 Family and Givenness as Mystery
- Chapter 4 Family and Dependence as Mystery
- Epilogue Morality of Appeal and Answer
- Bibliography
- Index
- Titles published in the series (continued from page iii)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Family and Christian Ethics , pp. 305 - 316Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Adolf, Adam. ‘Heilige Familie, I. Verehrung’. In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, Vol. 4, edited by Buchberger, Michael and Kasper, Walter, 1276–7. Freiburg: Herder, 1995.Google Scholar
Arndt, Andreas. ‘Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher: Unendliche Menschheit in der Hülle der Männlichkeit und der Weiblichkeit’. In Geschlechterordnung und Staat: Legitimationsfiguren der politischen Philosophie (1600–1850), Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, special volume 27, edited by Heinz, Marion and Doyé, Sabine, 293–304. Berlin: Akademie, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Michael W. Conceptions of Parenthood: Ethics and the Family. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Banner, Michael. The Ethics of Everyday Life: Moral Theology, Social Anthropology, and the Imagination of the Human. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Malden, MA: Polity, 2003.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich and Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth The Normal Chaos of Love, translated by Ritter, Mark and Wiebel, Jane. Cambridge: Polity, 1995.Google Scholar
Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth. Was kommt nach der Familie? Einblicke in neue Lebensformen. Munich: Beck, 1998.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jana. Water Is Thicker Than Blood: An Augustinian Theology of Marriage and Singleness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Anna A. ‘The Family Novel (and Its Curious Disappearance)’. Comparative Literature 72/1 (2020): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakeman, Bree. ‘Yolŋu Kinship and the Case for Extensionism: A Reply to Warren Shapiro’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18/3 (2012): 681–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blustein, Jeffrey. Parents and Children: The Ethics of the Family. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Boddy, Kasia. ‘Family’. In American Literature in Transition: 1990–2000, edited by Bur, Stephen J., 312–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Boehm, Gottfried. ‘Jenseits der Sprache? Anmerkungen zur Logik der Bilder’. In Iconic Turn: Die neue Macht der Bilder, edited by Maar, Christa and Burda, Hubert, 28–43. Cologne: DuMont, 2004.Google Scholar
Boehm, Gottfried ‘Die Wiederkehr der Bilder’. In Was ist ein Bild?, edited by Boehm, Gottfried, 11–38. Munich: W. Fink, 1994.Google Scholar
Boles, Janet K. and Hoeveler, Diane Long. Historical Dictionary of Feminism. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 1996.Google Scholar
Bollnow, Otto Friedrich. ‘Marcel’s Concept of Availability’. In The Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel, Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 17, edited by Schilpp, Paul Arthur and Hahn, Lewis Edwin, 177–99. Carbondale, IL: Open Court, 1984.Google Scholar
Bréchon, Pierre. La famille: Idées traditionnelles, idées nouvelles. Paris: Les Éditions Le Centurion, 1976. https://bit.ly/3ZwCbSP.Google Scholar
Brighouse, Harry and Swift, Adam. Family Values: The Ethics of Parent–Child Relationships. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brinig, Margaret F. ‘A Case for Integrated Parenthood’. In What Is Parenthood? Contemporary Debates about the Family, edited by McClain, Linda C. and Cere, Daniel, 147–70. New York: New York University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Brinig, Margaret F. Family, Law, and Community: Supporting the Covenant. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinig, Margaret F. From Contract to Covenant: Beyond the Law and Economics of the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Brinig, Margaret F. and Nock, Steven. ‘Covenant and Contract’. Regent University Law Review 12/9 (1999): 9–26.Google Scholar
Browning, Don S. Equality and the Family: A Fundamental, Practical Theology of Children, Mothers, and Fathers in Modern Societies. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007.Google Scholar
Browning, Don S ‘Introduction: The Equal-Regard Family in Context’. In The Equal-Regard Family and Its Friendly Critics: Don Browning and the Practical Theological Ethics of the Family, edited by Witte, John Jr., Christian Green, M. and Wheeler, Amy, 1–16. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007.Google Scholar
Browning, Don S Marriage and Modernization: How Globalization Threatens Marriage and What to Do about It. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar
Browning, Don S ‘World Family Trends’. In The Cambridge Companion to Christian Ethics, edited by Gill, Robin, 243–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Browning, Don S. and Lyon, Bernie. ‘Sociobiology and Ethical Reflection’. Theology Today 36/2 (1979): 229–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browning, Don S., Miller-McLemore, Bonnie J., Couture, Pamela D., Lyon, K. Brynolf and Franklin, Robert M.. From Culture Wars to Common Ground: Religion and the American Family Debate. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1997.Google Scholar
Busch, Thomas W. ‘Secondary Reflection as Interpretation’. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 7/1–2 (1995): 176–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. Antigone’s Claim: Kinship between Life and Death, Wellek Library Lectures 1998. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith ‘Is Kinship Always Already Heterosexual?’. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 13/1 (2002): 14–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith ‘Longing for Recognition’. In Hegel’s Philosophy and Feminist Thought: Beyond Antigone?, edited by Hutchings, Kimberly and Pulkkinen, Tuija, 109–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso, 2004.Google Scholar
Cahill, Lisa Sowle. Family: A Christian Social Perspective. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2000.Google Scholar
Cahill, Lisa Sowle Sex, Gender and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet ‘What Kinship Does and How’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3/2 (2013): 245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciavatta, David V. ‘The Family and the Bonds of Recognition’. Emotion, Space and Society 13 (2014): 71–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciavatta, David V. ‘On Burying the Dead: Funerary Rites and the Dialectic of Freedom and Nature in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit’. International Philosophical Quarterly 47/3 (2007): 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciavatta, David V. Spirit, the Family, and the Unconscious in Hegel’s Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ciavatta, David V. ‘The Unreflective Bonds of Intimacy: Hegel on Familial Ties and the Modern Person’. Philosophical Forum 37/2 (2006): 153–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, Rodney. Families at the Crossroads: Beyond Traditional and Modern Options. Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cormier, Andrée-Anne and Sypnowich, Christine, eds. ‘Special Issue on Family Values by H. Brighouse and A. Swift’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21/3 (2018): 279–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwall, Susannah. Un/familiar Theology. Reconceiving Sex, Reproduction and Generativity, Rethinking Theologies: Constructing Alternatives in History and Doctrine, Vol. 1. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017.Google Scholar
Dell, Kerstin. The Family Novel in North America from Post-war to Post-millennium: A Study in Genre. Trier: Universität Trier, 2005. https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-15a1-c8a9.Google Scholar
Derks, Marco, Vos, Pieter and Tromp, Thijs. ‘Under the Spell of the Ring: The Role of Marriage in Moral Debates among Orthodox Reformed Christians in the Netherlands’. Theology and Sexuality 20/1 (2014): 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRoche, Michael. ‘The Reversal of Creation in Hosea’. Vetus Testamentum 31/4 (1981): 400–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVries, Dawn. ‘Be Converted and Become as Little Children: Friedrich Schleiermacher on the Religious Significance of Childhood’. In The Child in Christian Thought, edited by Bunge, Marcia J., 329–49. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Dumm, Thomas and Butler, Judith. ‘Giving Away, Giving Over: A Conversation with Judith Butler’. Massachusetts Review 49/1–2 (2008): 95–105.Google Scholar
Erlemann, Hildegard. Die Heilige Familie. Ein Tugendvorbild der Gegenreformation im Wandel der Zeit. Kult und Ideologie, Schriftenreihe zur religiösen Kultur, Vol. 1. Muenster: Ardey, 1993.Google Scholar
Farneth, Molly. ‘Gender and the Ethical Given: Human and Divine Law in Hegel’s Reading of the Antigone’. Journal of Religious Ethics 41/4 (2013): 643–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, Luc. Familles, je vous aime: Politique et vie privée à l’âge de la mondialisation. Paris: XO Editions, 2007.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc. On Love: A Philosophy for the Twenty-First Century, translated by Brown, Andrew. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fertig, Georg and Szołtysek, Mikołaj. ‘Fertilität und Familienformen in Europa: Eine historische Perspektive’. In Handbuch Bevölkerungssoziologie, edited by Niephaus, Yasemin, Kreyenfeld, Michaela and Sackmann, Reinhold, 179–200. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency. New York: New Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fowler, Julianne. Family Narrative and Marilynne Robinson’s ‘Housekeeping’: Reading and Writing beyond Boundaries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Sarah ‘Transforming Kinship’. eLS 15 November (2013): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0005222.pub2.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, eds. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Gordon, Linda. ‘A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the U.S. Welfare State’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 19/2 (1994): 309–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. ‘Care Ethics’. In The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, edited by LaFollette, Hugh, 705–13. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
Fuhs, Burkhard. ‘Zur Geschichte der Familie’. In Handbuch Familie, edited by Ecarius, Jutta, 17–35. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives. 2nd ed. London: Profile Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Gill, Robin. Moral Passion and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, Stephen. Parental Rights and Responsibilities, The Library of Essays on Family Rights. London: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godelier, Maurice. The Metamorphoses of Kinship, translated by Scott, Nora. London: Verso, 2011.Google Scholar
Goode, William J. ‘Defining the Family: A Matter of More or Less’. In Morals, Marriage, and Parenthood: An Introduction to Family Ethics, edited by Houlgate, Laurence D., 27–30. London: Wadsworth, 1999.Google Scholar
Goossens, Wilfried. ‘Ethical Life and Family in the Phenomenology of Spirit’. In Hegel on the Ethical Life, Religion, and Philosophy: 1793–1807, edited by Wylleman, André, 163–94. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Grassi, Martín. ‘Existence as Belonging: The Existentialism of Gabriel Marcel’. Trilhas Filosóficas 12/3 (Edição Especial) (2019): 29–45. https://doi.org/10.25244/tf.v13i3.1222.Google Scholar
Hall, Kim Q., ed. ‘New Conversations in Feminist Disability Studies’. Hypatia 30/1 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauerwas, Stanley. ‘The Radical Hope in the Annunciation: Why Both Single and Married Christians Welcome Children (1998)’. In The Hauerwas Reader, edited by Berkman, John and Cartwright, Michael, 505–18. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, Stanley ‘Sex in Public: How Adventurous Christians Are Doing It (1978)’. In The Hauerwas Reader, edited by Berkman, John and Cartwright, Michael, 481–504. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haverkamp-Begemann, Egbert. Rembrandt: The Holy Family. St. Petersburg: Gerson Lectures Foundation, 1995.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. ‘The Ethics of Care’. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, edited by Copp, David, 537–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195147790.003.0020.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, edited by Larsson, Georg (on the basis of the commentaries of Gans). Leipzig: Felix Meiner, 1911. First published 1821.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Phänomenologie des Geistes, Werke Vol. 3, based on Werke 1832–1845, 5th new ed., edited by Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1996.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by Miller, Arnold Vincent, with analysis of the text and foreword by John Niemeyer Findlay. Oxford: Clarendon, 1977.Google Scholar
Miller, Arnold Vincent Philosophy of Right, translated by Knox, Thomas Malcolm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967. First published 1952 by Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Jill. ‘On the Problem and Mystery of Evil: Marcel’s Existential Dissolution of an Antinomy’. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 23/2 (2018): 113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. Antigone Interrupted. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, Bonnie ‘Ismene’s Forced Choice: Sacrifice and Sorority in Sophocles’ Antigone’. Arethusa 44/1 (2011): 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlgate, Laurence D., ed. Morals, Marriage, and Parenthood: An Introduction to Family Ethics. London: Wadsworth, 1999.Google Scholar
Höver, Gerhard, de Kruijf, Gerrit, O’Donovan, Oliver and Wannenwetsch, Bernd, eds. ‘The Freedom of the Family: An Ecumenical Contribution to a European Debate’. In Die Familie im neuen Europa: Ethische Herausforderungen und interdisziplinäre Perspektiven, Symposion: Anstöβe zur interdisziplinären Verständigung, Vol. 9, edited by Höver, Gerhard, de Kruijf, Gerrit, O’Donovan, Oliver and Wannenwetsch, Bernd, 9–60. Muenster: LIT, 2008.Google Scholar
Hoy, Jocelyn B. ‘Hegel, Antigone, and Feminist Critique: The Spirit of Ancient Greece’. In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by Westphal, Kenneth R., 172–89. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly and Pulkkinen, Tuija, eds. Hegel’s Philosophy and Feminist Thought: Beyond Antigone? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jecker, Nancy. ‘Conceiving a Child to Save a Child: Reproductive and Filial Ethics’. In Morals, Marriage, and Parenthood: An Introduction to Family Ethics, edited by Houlgate, Laurence D., 206–11. London: Wadsworth, 1999.Google Scholar
Jeremias, Jörg ‘Hosea in the Book of the Twelve’. In The Book of the Twelve: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation, edited by Tiemeyer, Lena-Sofia and Wöhrle, Jakob, 111–23. Leiden: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
LaFollette, Hugh. ‘Licensing Parents’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 9/2 (1980): 182–97.Google Scholar
LaFollette, Hugh ‘Licensing Parents Revisited’. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27/4 (2010): 327–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaivola, Karen. ‘The Pleasures and Perils of Merging: Female Subjectivity in Marilynne Robinson’s Housekeeping’. Contemporary Literature 34/ 4 (1993): 670–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Eleanor. ‘Why the Family Is Beautiful (Lacan against Badiou)’. Diacritics 32/3–4 (2002): 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefe, Alice A. Woman’s Body and the Social Body in Hosea. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2001.Google Scholar
Keita, Katrin. Gottes Land: Exegetische Studien zur Land-Thematik im Hoseabuch in kanonischer Perspektive. Hildesheim: Olms, 2007.Google Scholar
Kelle, Brad E. ‘Hosea 1–3 in Twentieth-Century Scholarship’. Currents in Biblical Research 7/2 (2009): 179–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelle, Brad E. ‘Hosea 4–14 in Twentieth-Century Scholarship’. Currents in Biblical Research 8/3 (2010): 314–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Catherine. Cloud of the Impossible. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kemp, Wolfgang. Rembrandt: Die Heilige Familie, oder die Kunst, einen Vorhang zu lüften. Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch, 1986.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. ‘Dependence’. In Keywords for Disability Studies, edited by Adams, Rachel, Reiss, Benjamin and Serlin, David, 54–8. New York: New York University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder Learning from My Daughter: The Value and Care of Disabled Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder ‘When Caring Is Just and Justice Is Caring’. In The Subject of Care, edited by Kittay, Eva Feder and Feder, Ellen K., 257–76. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Koschorke, Albrecht. Die Heilige Familie und ihre Folgen. Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch, 2000.Google Scholar
Laist, Bruno. Das Problem der Abhängigkeit in Schleiermachers Anthropologie und Bildungslehre. Ratingen bei Düsseldorf: A. Henn, 1965.Google Scholar
Lardinois, André. ‘Antigone’. In A Companion to Sophocles, edited by Ormand, Kirk, 55–68. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Lenz, Karl and Böhnisch, Lothar. ‘Zugänge zu Familien – ein Grundlagentext’. In Familien: eine interdisziplinäre Einführung, edited by Böhnisch, Lothar and Lenz, Karl, 9–63. Weinheim: Juventa, 1997.Google Scholar
Lieske, Saskia. Von der Form zur Beziehungsgestaltung: Zugänge zur Familie in der evangelischen Ethik, Arbeiten zur systematischen Theologie, Vol. 12. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2019.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair C. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues, Paul Carus Lectures. Chicago, IL: Open Court, 1999.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel. The Mystery of Being, Vol. I: Reflection & Mystery. Translated by Fraser, G. S.. Chicago, IL: Regnery, 1950.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel ‘“The Mystery of the Family” and “The Creative Vow as Essence of Fatherhood”’. In Homo Viator: Introduction to the Metaphysic of Hope, translated by Craufurd, Emma and Seaton, Paul, 62–117. South Bend, IN: Graham 2010. First published 1945 by Aubier.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel ‘Reply to Gene Reeves’. In The Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel, Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 17, edited by Schilpp, Paul Arthur and Hahn, Lewis Edwin, 272–4. Carbondale, IL: Open Court, 1984.Google Scholar
Marcel, Gabriel ‘Reply to Otto Friedrich Bollnow’. In The Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel, Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 17, edited by Schilpp, Paul Arthur and Hahn, Lewis Edwin, 200–3. Carbondale, IL: Open Court, 1984.Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C. and Cere, Daniel, eds. What Is Parenthood? Contemporary Debates about the Family. New York: New York University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFall, Michael T. Licensing Parents: Family, State, and Child Maltreatment. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2009.Google Scholar
McKenny, Gerald P. Biotechnology, Human Nature, and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Susan. ‘On Kinship and Marriage: A Critique of the Genetic and Gender Calculus of Evolutionary Psychology’. In Complexities: Beyond Nature and Nurture, edited by McKinnon, Susan and Silverman, Sydel, 106–31. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, eds. Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press, 2013.Google Scholar
McLanahan, Sara and Sandefur, Gary. Growing Up with a Single Parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Michaud, Thomas A. ‘Gabriel Marcel’s Catholic Dramaturgy’. Renascence 55/3 (2003): 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaud, Thomas A. ‘Secondary Reflection and Marcelian Anthropology’. Philosophy Today 34/3 (1990): 222–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz. ‘Hegel’s Antigone’. In Feminist interpretations of G. W. F. Hegel, edited by Mills, Patricia Jagentowicz, 59–88. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Morgan, David H. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity, 1996.Google Scholar
Morgan, David H. Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muel-Dreyfus, Francine. Vichy and the Eternal Feminine: A Contribution to a Political Sociology of Gender, translated by Johnson, Kathleen A.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Murray, Penelope. ‘Tragedy, Women and the Family in Plato’s Republic’. In Plato and the Poets, edited by Destrée, Pierre and Herrmann, Fritz-Gregor, 175–93. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Norlock, Kathryn. ‘Teaching “against Marriage”, or, “But Professor, Marriage Isn’t a Contract!”.’ In The Ethics of the Family, edited by Scales, Stephen, Potthast, Adam and Oravecz, Linda, 121–32. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2010.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995. First published 1986.Google Scholar
Nwaoru, Emmanuel O. Imagery in the Prophecy of Hosea, Ägypten und Altes Testament. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1999.Google Scholar
Papile, Anna. Sisters and Greek Tragedy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, 2016.Google Scholar
Parkin, Robert. ‘What Shapiro and McKinnon Are All About, and Why Kinship Still Needs Anthropologists’. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 17/2 (2009): 158–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Mary. ‘Introduction: Reclaiming Paradigms Lost’. Australian Journal of Anthropology 16/1 (2005): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierron, Jean-Philippe. Le Climat Familial. Une Poétique de la Famille. Paris: Éditions Cerf, 2009.Google Scholar
Pierron, Jean-Philippe ‘Famille et Sécularisation: Penser la Famille en Postchrétienté’. Théophilyon 21/1 (2016): 145–65.Google Scholar
Pinsker, Sanford. ‘Marilynne Robinson’. In Conversations with Contemporary American Writers, Costerus, New Series, Vol. 50, 118–27. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1985.Google Scholar
Pope, Stephen. Human Evolution and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Matthew. ‘“The World Will Be Made Whole”: Love, Loss, and the Sacramental Imagination in Marilynne Robinson’s Housekeeping’. Christianity & Literature 66/3 (2017): 482–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuß, Eckhardt. Die Stellung und Bedeutung der Familie in der Pädagogik Schleiermachers. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophische Fakultät der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität zu Münster Westphalia, 1966.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Robert. Families, Children and the Quest for a Global Ethic. London: Routledge, 2018. First published 1997 by Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ravits, Martha. ‘Extending the American Range: Marilynne Robinson’s Housekeeping’. American Literature 61/4 (1989): 644–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Réau, Louis. Iconographie de l’Art Chrétien, Vol. II/2. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1957.Google Scholar
Richter, Klemens. ‘Familie, heilige’. In Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Vol. 3, edited by Betz, Hans D., Browning, Don S., Janowski, Bernd and Jüngel, Eberhard, 25. Tuebingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.Google Scholar
Robinson, Marilynne. ‘Family’. In The Death of Adam: Essays on Modern Thought, 87–107. New York: Picador, 1998.Google Scholar
Robinson, Marilynne Housekeeping. London: Faber & Faber, 2005. First published 1980 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Rubio, Julie Hanlon and King, Jason E.. Sex, Love, and Families: Catholic Perspectives. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Sabean, David Warren, Teuscher, Simon and Mathieu, Jon, eds. Kinship in Europe. Approaches to Long-Term Development (1300–1900). New York: Berghahn, 2007.Google Scholar
Sachs, H. ‘Familie, Heilige’. In Lexikon der christlichen Ikonographie, Vol. 2, edited by Kirschbaum, Engelbert and Braunfels, Wolfgang, 4–7. Freiburg: Herder, 1990.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. ‘Birth Is the Metaphor’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 18/3 (2012): 673–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall Hierarchy, Equality, and the Sublimation of Anarchy. The Western Illusion of Human Nature, Tanner Lectures on Human Values, delivered at the University of Michigan, 4 November 2005. https://bit.ly/3XWYtf7. Later published at Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm, 2008.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall The Use and Abuse of Biology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall What Kinship Is – And Is Not. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Scales, Stephen, Potthast, Adam and Oravecz, Linda, eds. The Ethics of the Family. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2010.Google Scholar
Schaafsma, Petruschka. ‘Dignity in the Family? Analyzing Our Ambiguous Relationship to the Family and Theological Suggestions toward Overcoming It’. In Fragile Dignity: Intercontextual Conversations on Scriptures, Family, and Violence, Semeia Studies/Society of Biblical Literature, Vol. 72, edited by Juliana Claassens, L. and Spronk, Klaas, 169–88. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2013.Google Scholar
Schaafsma, Petruschka ‘The Embodied Character of “Acknowledging God”: A Contribution to Understanding the Relationship between Transcendence and Embodiment on the Basis of Hosea’. In Embodied Religion, Ars Disputandi Supplement Series, Vol. 6, edited by Jonkers, Peter and Sarot, Marcel, 47–70. Utrecht: Ars Disputandi, 2013.Google Scholar
Schaafsma, Petruschka ‘Evil and Religion: Ricoeurian Reflections on Postsecular Reassessments of Religion’. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76/2 (2015): 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaafsma, Petruschka ‘The Family as Mystery: Why Taking into Account Transcendence Is Needed in Current Family Debates’. In The Transcendent Character of the Good: Philosophical and Theological Perspectives, edited by Schaafsma, Petruschka, 210–27. London: Routledge, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaafsma, Petruschka ‘Making Sense of the Postsecular: Theological Explorations of a Critical Concept’. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76/2 (2015): 91–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaafsma, Petruschka Reconsidering Evil: Confronting Reflections with Confessions, Studies in Theology, Philosophical, Vol. 36. Leuven: Peeters, 2006.Google Scholar
Schaafsma, Petruschka ‘Telling Images: On the Value of a “Strong Image” for Theological Ethics’. In Die Zeit der Bilder: Ikonische Repräsentation und Temporalität, edited by Moxter, Michael and Firchow, Markus, 144–60. Tuebingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.Google Scholar
Schaafsma, Petruschka ‘What Is at Stake in the Family? Ethical Reflections on Recent Sociological Research into the Family’. In Family: Kinship that Matters/ Familie: Verwandtschaft die den Unterschied macht, Beihefte zur Ökumenischen Rundschau, Vol. 92, edited by den Hertog, Gerard and Roskovec, Jan, 22–37. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2012.Google Scholar
Schaub, Thomas and Robinson, Marilynne. ‘An Interview with Marilynne Robinson’. Contemporary Literature 35/2 (1994): 231–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilpp, Paul Arthur and Hahn, Lewis Edwin, eds. The Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel, Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 17. Carbondale, IL: Open Court, 1984.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst. Ethik (1812/13), edited by Braun, Otto and Birkner, Hans-Joachim. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1981.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Lectures on Philosophical Ethics 1812–13, translated by Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Die praktische Theologie nach den Grundsätzen der evangelischen Kirche im Zusammenhang dargestellt: Aus Schleiermachers handschriftlichem Nachlasse und nachgeschriebenen Vorlesungen, Sämtliche Werke, Vol. 1/13. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011. First published 1850 by Reimer.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Predigten, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Dritte Abteilung, Vol. 1, edited by Meckenstock, Günter. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
Schneider, David. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottroff, Willy. ‘jd’ / erkennen’. In Theologisches Handwörterbuch zum Alten Testament, edited by Jenni, Ernst and Westermann, Claus, 682–701. Munich: Chr. Kaiser, 1984.Google Scholar
Scott, Elizabeth S. and Garrison, Marsha, eds. Marriage at the Crossroads: Law, Policy, and the Brave New World of Twenty-First-Century Families. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Seifert, Brigitte. Metaphorisches Reden von Gott im Hoseabuch. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Warren. ‘Anti-family Fantasies in “Cutting-Edge” Anthropological Kinship Studies’. Academic Questions 25/3 (2012): 394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Warren ‘Contesting Marshall Sahlins on Kinship’. Oceania, 84/1 (2014): 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Warren ‘Extensionism and the Nature of Kinship’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18/1 (2012): 191–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Warren ‘A (P)lot of Marxist Crop: A Review Article’. International Journal of Sociology of the Family 35/1 (2009): 123–41.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Warren ‘What Human Kinship Is Primarily About: Toward a Critique of the New Kinship Studies’. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 16/2 (2008): 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siep, Ludwig. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by Smyth, Daniel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, Christina Hoff. ‘Filial Morality’. Journal of Philosophy 83/8 (1986): 439–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sophocles. Antigone. In Antigone; The Women of Trachis; Philoctetes; Oedipus at Colonus, Loeb Classical Library Series, Vol. 21, edited and translated by Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, 1–128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Sophocles Antigone. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Edited and translated by Griffith, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. ‘Uncoupling Marriage and Parenting’. In What Is Parenthood? Contemporary Debates about the Family, edited by McClain, Linda C. and Cere, Daniel, 65–84. New York: New York University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, Antoinette. ‘The Feminist Critique of Hegel on Women and the Family’. Animus 2 (1997): 1–29. www2.swgc.mun.ca/animus/Articles/Volume%202/stafford1.pdf.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn Reproducing the Future. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sullivan-Dunbar, Sandra. ‘Gratuity, Embodiment, and Reciprocity. Christian Love and Justice in Light of Human Dependency’. Journal of Religious Ethics 41/2 (2013): 254–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan-Dunbar, Sandra Human Dependency and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetman, Brendan. The Vision of Gabriel Marcel: Epistemology, Human Person, the Transcendent. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasker, Fiona. ‘Developmental Outcomes for Children Raised by Lesbian and Gay Parents’. In What Is Parenthood? Contemporary Debates about the Family, edited by McClain, Linda C. and Cere, Daniel, 171–90. New York: New York University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Adrian. ‘Families’. In The Oxford Handbook of Theology, Sexuality, and Gender, edited by Thatcher, Adrian, 590–607. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199664153.013.006.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Adrian Living Together and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Laurence. The Family and the Political Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Crombrugge, Hans. Verwantschap en verschil: Over de betekenis van het gezin en de betekenis van het ouderschap in de moderne pedagogiek. Antwerp: Garant, 1999.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. ‘The Gift and the Given: Three Nano-essays on Kinship and Magic’. In Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered, edited by Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James, 237–68. New York: Berghahn, 2009.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. ‘When Justice Replaces Affection: The Need for Rights’. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 11/3 (1988): 625–41.Google Scholar
Waters, Brent. The Family in Christian Social and Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmer, S. E. and Audronė, Žukauskaitė. Interrogating Antigone in Postmodern Philosophy and Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Robert A. ‘Kinship Past, Kinship Present: Bio-essentialism in the Study of Kinship’. American Anthropologist 118/3 (2016): 570–84.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr. Church, State, and Family: Reconciling Traditional Teachings and Modern Liberties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Peter. ‘The Anthropological Case for the Integrative Model’. In What Is Parenthood? Contemporary Debates about the Family, edited by Linda, C. McClain and Cere, Daniel, 85–104. New York: New York University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorgdrager, Heleen. Theologie die verschil maakt: Taal en sekse-differentie als sleutels tot Schleiermachers denken. Zoetermeer: Boekencentrum, 2003.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access