Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T09:52:20.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14C IN TREE RINGS IN THE VICINITY OF THE RBMK REACTOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2024

Evgeniy I Nazarov*
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Ecology UB RAS, 620108, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Alexander V Kruzhalov
Affiliation:
Ural Federal University, 620002, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Maxim E Vasyanovich
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Ecology UB RAS, 620108, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Alexey A Ekidin
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Ecology UB RAS, 620108, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Maria D Pyshkina
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Ecology UB RAS, 620108, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Vladimir V Kukarskikh
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology UB RAS, 620144, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Ekaterina V Parkhomchuk
Affiliation:
Institute of Archeology and Ethnography SB RAS, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: e.nazarov1005@gmail.com

Abstract

The paper presents the results of radiocarbon (14C) concentration measurements in tree rings in the vicinity of Kursk NPP (Russia) with four operating RBMK reactors. The sampling was carried out from the site with the highest expected accumulation of radiocarbon in vegetation. The site was determined with long-term meteorological data. The measurements of 14C concentration carried out with accelerator-mass spectrometer in Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia. The obtained results demonstrated the influence of exploitation of Kursk NPP to the concentration of 14C in tree rings. Based on the equilibrium between the 14C ratio in the tree rings and the surrounding air, retrospective estimates of the radiocarbon discharge and effective doses were made. Effective doses were calculated with two approaches: IAEA methodology and less conservative approach, considering the real food consumption in the Kursk region. The values of calculated doses by the second method (0.08–2.58 μSv) are more than 2 times less than IAEA approach (0.17–5.30 μSv). The highest difference between measured and background 14C in tree ring is 41.7 ± 5.8 pMC in 2014 during the restoration of graphite stack. The main contribution to 14С exposure in the considering period is caused by background – from 70 to 99%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cook, ER, Kairiukstis, LA, editors. 1990. Methods of dendrochronology: applications in the environmental sciences. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ežerinskis, Ž, Šapolaitė, J, Pabedinskas, A, Juodis, L, Garbaras, A, Maceika, E, Remeikis, V. 2018. Annual variations of 14C concentration in the tree rings in the vicinity of Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant. Radiocarbon 60(4):12271236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, RL. 1983. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bulletin 43:6978.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2001. Generic models for use in assessing the impact of discharges of radioactive substances to the environment. Safety Reports Series 19:143144.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2004. Management of waste containing tritium and carbon-14. Technical Reports 421: 1128.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2012. Handbook of parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide transfer in terrestrial and freshwater environments. Technical Reports 472:139141.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2014. Safety standards. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards. General Safety Requirements Part 3:137. Google Scholar
ICRP. 2012. Compendium of dose coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60. Publication 119. 59.Google Scholar
Janovics, R, Kern, Z, Güttler, D, Wacker, L, Barnabás, I, Molnár, M. 2013. radiocarbon impact on a nearby tree of a light-water VVER-type nuclear power plant, Paks, Hungary. Radiocarbon 55(2):826832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kryshev, AI, Kryshev, II, Vasyanovich, ME, Ekidin, AA, Kapustin, IA, Murashova, EL. 2020. Population irradiation dose assessment for 14C emissions from NPP with RBMK-1000 and EGP-2 reactors. Atomic Energy 128:5359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysikov, AI, Kalinkin, PN, Sashkina, KA, Okunev, AG, Parkhomchuk, EV, Rastigeev, SA, Parkhomchuk, VV, Kuleshov, DV, Vorobyeva, EE. 2018. Novel simplified absorption-catalytic method of sample preparation for AMS analysis designed at the Laboratory of Radiocarbon Methods of Analysis (LRMA) in Novosibirsk Akademgorodok. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 433:1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NASA. 2023. Carbon dioxide. URL: <https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/> >Google Scholar
Nazarov, EI, Kruzhalov, AV, Ekidin, AA, Vasyanovich, ME, Parkhomchuk, VV, Rastigeev, SA, Kalinkin, PN, Parkhomchuk, EV. 2021. Instruments and methods for measuring 14С (a review). Instruments and Experiments Technics 64:790795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazarov, EI, Kruzhalov, AV, Vasyanovich, ME, Ekidin, AA, Kukarskikh, VV, Parkhomchuk, EV, Petrozhitskii, AV, Parkhomchuk, VV. 2022. 14C in tree rings in the vicinity of the nuclear facility deployment areas. Nuclear Energy and Technology 8(3):173177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhomchuk, EV, Petrozhitskiy, AV, Ignatov, MM, Kuleshov, DV, Lysikov, AI, Okunev, AG, Babina, KA, Parkhomchuk, VV. Submitted. 14C GIRI samples in AMS Golden Valley: graphite preparation using AGE-3 and absorption-catalytic setup. Radiocarbon.Google Scholar
Parkhomchuk, VV, Rastigeev, SA. 2011. Accelerator mass spectrometer of the center for collective use of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Journal of Surface Investigation 5(6):10681072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrozhitskiy, AV, Parkhomchuk, EV, Ignatov, MM, Kuleshov, DV, Kutnyakova, LA, Konstantinov, ES, Parkhomchuk, VV. Forthcoming. Comparative features of BINP AMS and MICADAS facilities working at AMS Golden Valley, Russia. Radiocarbon.Google Scholar
Pleil, JD, Ariel Geer Wallace, M, Davis, MD, Matty, CM. 2021. The physics of human breathing: flow, timing, volume, and pressure parameters for normal, on-demand, and ventilator respiration. Journal of Breath Research 15(4).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinn, F. 1996. Brochure over products and applications. Heidelberg: Frank Rinn Distribution.Google Scholar
Rostekhnadzor. 2021. Safety Guidelines for the Use of Atomic Energy. Recommended Methods for Calculating the Parameters Necessary for the Development and Establishment of Standards for Maximum Permissible Emissions of Radioactive Substances into the Atmosphere. RB-106-21.Google Scholar
Stenstrom, K, Skog, G, Thornberg, C, Erlandsson, B, Hellborg, R, Mattsson, S, Persson, P. 1997. 14C levels in the vicinity of two Swedish nuclear power plants and at two “clean-air” sites in southernmost Sweden. Radiocarbon 40(1):433438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, M, Smiley, T. 1968. An introduction to tree-ring dating. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar