Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T16:06:20.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the short version of Family Sense of Coherence Scale in a sample of persons with cancer in the palliative stage and their family members

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2019

Marie-Louise Möllerberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Kristofer Årestedt
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden The Research Section, Region Kalmar County, Kalmar, Sweden
Anna Sandgren
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden Center for Collaborative Palliative Care, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden
Eva Benzein
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden Center for Collaborative Palliative Care, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden
Katarina Swahnberg
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden
*
Author for correspodence: Marie-Louise Möllerberg, Skåne University Hospital, Lasarettsgatan 23, S-22185Sweden. Email: miomollerberg@veberod.com

Abstract

Objectives

For patients’ entire families, it can be challenging to live with cancer during the palliative stage. However, a sense of coherence buffers stress and could help health professionals identify families that require support. Therefore, the short version of the Family Sense of Coherence Scale (FSOC-S) was translated, culturally adapted, and validated in a Swedish sample.

Methods

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FSOC-S into Swedish was conducted in accordance with the World Health Organization's Process for Translation and Adaptation of Research Instruments guidelines. Participants were recruited from two oncology clinics and two palliative centers in Sweden.

Results

Content validity was supported by experts (n = 7), persons with cancer (n = 179), and family members (n = 165). Homogeneity among items was satisfactory for persons with cancer and family members (item-total correlations were 0.45‒0.70 and 0.55‒0.72, respectively) as well as internal consistency (ordinal alpha = 0.91 and 0.91, respectively). Factor analyses supported unidimensionality. FSOC-S correlated (rs > 0.3) with hope, anxiety, and symptoms of depression, which supported convergent validity. The test-retest reliability for items ranged between fair and good (kw = 0.37‒0.61).

Significance of Results

The FSOC-S has satisfactory measurement properties to assess family sense of coherence in persons with cancer and their family members. FSOC-S could be used to identify family members who experience low levels of perceived family sense of coherence which provides health care professionals with insight into families’ needs and ability to live with cancer in the palliative stage.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, D (1991) Practical Statistics For Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A (1987) Unravelling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A (1993) The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science & Medicine 36(6), 725733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonovsky, A and Sourani, T (1988) Family sense of coherence and family adaption. Journal of Marriage and Family 50, 7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoun, S, Slatyer, S, Deas, K and Nekolaichuk, C (2017) Family caregiver participation in palliative care research: challenging the myth. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 53(5), 851861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benzein, E and Berg, A (2003) The Swedish version of Herth Hope Index‒an instrument for palliative care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 17(4), 409415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, M, Wilcox, R, Chou, C-P, Chang, M, Yang, F, Blanchard, J, Marerella, A, Kou, A, and Clark, F (2012) Psychometric properties of reverse-scored items on the CES-D in a sample of ethnically diverse older adults. Psychological Assessment 23(2), 558562. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecen, A (2007) The Turkish version of the Family Sense of Coherence Scale-short form (FSOC-S): Initial development and validation. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 7, 12111218.Google Scholar
Clark, L and Watson, D (1995) Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment 7(3), 309319. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Agostino, R, Belanger, A and D'Agostino, J (1990) A suggestion for using powerful and informative test of normality. The American Statistician 44(4), 316321.Google Scholar
Del-Pino-Casado, R, Espinosa-Medina, A, Lopez-Martinez, C, and Orgeta, V (2019) Sense of coherence, burden and mental health in caregiving: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 1(242), 1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djukanovic, I, Carlsson, J and Årestedt, K (2017) Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65-80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 15(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0759-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, M, Lindström, B and Lilja, J (2007) Evidence based public health policy and practice: A sense of coherence and health. Salutogenesis in a societal context: Åland, a special case? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61(8), 684688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fjose, M, Eilertsen, G, Kirkevold, M and Grov, EK (2016) A valuable but demanding time family life during advanced cancer in an elderly family member. ANS Advances in Nursing Science 39(4), 358373. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadermann, A, Guhn, M and Zumbo, B (2012) Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: a conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 17, 113.Google Scholar
Geisinger, K (1994) Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment 6(4), 304312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goren, A, Gilloteau, I, Lees, M and DaCosta Dibonaventura, M (2014) Quantifying the burden of informal caregiving for patients with cancer in Europe. Support Care Cancer 22(6), 16371646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2122-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, JS and Davis, LL (1997) Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health 20(3), 269274.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herth, K (1992) Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 17(10), 12511259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsiao, CY, Lu, HL and Tsai, YF (2018) Effect of family sense of coherence on internalized stigma and health-related quality of life among individuals with schizophrenia. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 27(1), 138146. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenny, DA, Kashy, DA and Cook, WL (2006) Dyadic Data Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Koo, TK and Li, MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15(2), 155163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisspers, J, Nygren, A and Soderman, E (1997) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD): some psychometric data for a Swedish sample. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 96(4), 281286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maneesriwongul, W and Dixon, JK (2004) Instrument translation process: a methods review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 48(2), 175186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moen, O and Hall-Lord, M (2016) Reliability and validity of the Norwegian Family Sense of Coherence Scale. Open Journal of Nursing 6, 10751086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollerberg, ML, Sandgren, A, Lithman, T, Noreen, D, Olsson, H and Sjovall, K (2016) The effects of a cancer diagnosis on the health of a patient's partner: a population-based registry study of cancer in Sweden. European Journal of Cancer Care 25(5), 744752. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Möllerberg, M-L, Sandgren, A, Swahnberg, K and Benzein, E (2017) Familial interaction patterns during the palliative stage of a family member living with cancer. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing 19(1), 6774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngai, FW and Ngu, SF (2011) Translation and validation of a chinese version of the Family Sense of Coherence scale in Chinese childbearing families. Nursing Research 60(5), 295301. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182269b00CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngai, FW and Ngu, SF (2014) Family sense of coherence and family adaptation among childbearing couples. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 46(2), 8290. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northouse, LL (2012) Helping patients and their family caregivers cope with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 39(5), 500506. https://doi.org/10.1188/12.ONF.500-506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polit, DF and Beck, CT (2006) The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health 29(5), 489497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post-White, J, Ceronsky, C, Kreitzer, M, Nickelson, K, Drew, D, Mackey, K, Koopmeiners, L, and Gutnecht, S (1996) Hope, spirituality, SOC, and quality of life in survivors with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 23(10), 15711579.Google Scholar
Sagy, S (1998) Effects of personal, family and community characteristics on emotional reactions in a stress situation. Youth & Society 29, 311329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidani, S, Guruge, S, Miranda, J, Ford-Gilboe, M and Varcoe, C (2010) Cultural adaptation and translation of measures: an integrated method. Research in Nursing & Health 33(2), 133143. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streiner, D, Norman, G and Cairney, J (2014) Health Measurement Scales: a Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streiner, DL (2003) Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment 80(1), 99103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terry, W, Olson, LG, Ravenscroft, P, Wilss, L and Boulton-Lewis, G (2006) Hospice patients' views on research in palliative care. Journal of Internal Medicine 36(7), 406413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01078.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weijters, B and Baumgartner, H (2012) Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: a review. Journal of Marketing Research 49(5), 737747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, G (2015) Analyses of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design - Understanding Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2013) Management of substance abuse: Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. World health organization. Available at https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/ (Accessed 1 May 2019).Google Scholar
Zigmond, AS and Snaith, RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 67(6), 361370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed