Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:54:58.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a new paradigm of dust structure in AGN: Dissecting the mid-IR emission of Circinus galaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2021

Marko Stalevski
Affiliation:
Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia email: mstalevski@aob.rs
Daniel Asmus
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, SouthamptonUnited Kingdom
Konrad R. W. Tristram
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent mid-infrared (MIR) observations of nearby active galactic nuclei (AGN), revealed that their dust emission appears prominently extended in the polar direction, at odds with the expectations from the canonical dusty torus. This polar dust, tentatively associated with dusty winds driven by radiation pressure, is found to have a major contribution to the MIR flux from a few to hundreds of parsecs. One such source with a clear detection of polar dust is a nearby, well-known AGN in the Circinus galaxy. We proposed a phenomenological model consisting of a compact, thin dusty disk and a large-scale polar outflow in the form of a hyperboloid shell and demonstrated that such a model is able to explain the peculiar MIR morphology on large scales seen by VLT/VISIR and the interferometric data from VLTI/MIDI that probe the small scales. Our results call for caution when attributing dust emission of unresolved sources entirely to the torus and warrant further investigation of the MIR emission in the polar regions of AGN.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Antonucci, R. 1993, AR&AA, 31, 47310.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmus, D., Hönig, S. F., & Gandhi, P. 2016, ApJ, 822, 10910.3847/0004-637X/822/2/109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baes, M., Verstappen, J., De Looze, I., et al. 2011, ApJS, 196, 2210.1088/0067-0049/196/2/22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baes, M. & Camps, P. 2015, Astronomy and Computing, 12, 3310.1016/j.ascom.2015.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camps, P., & Baes, M. 2015, Astronomy and Computing, 9, 2010.1016/j.ascom.2014.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hönig, S. F., Kishimoto, M., Antonucci, R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 14910.1088/0004-637X/755/2/149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Gonzaga, N., Burtscher, L., Tristram, K. R. W., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A47Google Scholar
Netzer, H. 2015, AR&AA, 53, 36510.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tristram, K. R. W., Burtscher, L., Jaffe, W., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A82Google Scholar
Stalevski, M., Asmus, D., & Tristram, K. R. W. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 385410.1093/mnras/stx2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalevski, M., Tristram, K. R. W., & Asmus, D. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 333410.1093/mnras/stz220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tristram, K. R. W., Burtscher, L., Jaffe, W., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A82Google Scholar