2 results
Admission Screening for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) in Bone Marrow Transplant Populations
- Jessica Tarabay, Marie Ayers, Tanushree Soni, Amelia Langston, Emily Bracewell, Christina Bell, Maria Crain, Don Hutcherson, Mitzy Smiley
-
- Journal:
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology / Volume 41 / Issue S1 / October 2020
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 November 2020, p. s113
- Print publication:
- October 2020
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Background:Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common healthcare-associated infection (HAI) and is often associated with increased medical costs and longer lengths of hospital stay. Previous studies have highlighted that hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are at an increased risk for CDI of up to 33% from other hospitalized patients. Studies have also supported the prevalence of asymptomatic colonization with C. difficile among HSCT patients. Asymptomatic colonization with C. difficile is a significant risk factor for transmission of infection to other patients developing hospital onset (HO-CDI). Therefore, targeted infection prevention efforts, such as early identification of patients with community-onset (CO-CDI) and patients with asymptomatic colonization with CDI in HSCT patients, may be effective in reducing the occurrence of HO-CDI. We discuss the CDI admission screening protocol in Emory University Hospital’s (EUH) bone marrow transplant (BMT) unit. Methods: As part of an infection prevention initiative, a CDI screening protocol was implemented in December 2018 for all patients that admitted to the EUH inpatient BMT unit. Upon admission, patients were screened for CO-CDI symptoms, specifically loose or unformed stools. A C. difficile toxin assay PCR would be collected within the first 3 calendar days of admission for all patients screened. Patients with symptoms were placed on isolation precautions pending results of the C. difficile toxin assay. If a patient had a positive C. difficile toxin assay result, isolation precautions would be maintained for the duration of hospitalization regardless of symptoms. Patients who are were unable to produce a stool specimen on the first 3 days of admission were excluded from the screening protocol. Patients with positive C. difficile toxin assay PCRs were classified as CO-CDI and were treated. Results: Since implementation of the CDI screening protocol, 109 CDI events were identified from January 2019 to October 2019. Moreover, 79% of positive C. difficile toxin assays were collected within the first 3 calendar days of admission. HO-CDI has decreased from 78% in 2018 to 21% during the designated time frame. Conclusions: CDI screening upon admission of BMT populations has shown a decrease among HO-CDI by early identification of CO-CDI and CO asymptomatic colonization with C. difficile. This early identification has allowed rapid implementation of infection preventions precautions, thus reducing risk of unit-based transmission.
Funding: None
Disclosures: None
Evaluating Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection In Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A National Study
- Nishi N. Shah, William McClellan, Christopher R. Flowers, Sagar Lonial, Hannah Khoury, Edmund K. Waller, Amelia Langston, Ajay K. Nooka
-
- Journal:
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology / Volume 38 / Issue 6 / June 2017
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 23 March 2017, pp. 651-657
- Print publication:
- June 2017
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVE
Large-scale studies evaluating risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), a leading cause of infectious diarrhea among patients undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT), are lacking. We have evaluated risk factors for CDI among both autologous SCT (auto-SCT), and allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) recipients using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database provided by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP).
METHODSWe used patient data obtained from the NIS database for all adult patients admitted for auto- and allo-SCTs from January 2001 to December 2010. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses to evaluate risk factors of CDI in auto- and allo-SCT patients.
RESULTSAuto-SCTs constituted 61.5% of all SCTs performed during the study period. Of the 53,072 auto-SCT patients, 5.8% had CDI, whereas 8.5% of 33,189 allo-SCT patients had CDI. Univariate analyses identified age, gender, indication for SCT, radiation as part of the conditioning regimen, respiratory failure, septicemia, lengthy hospital stay, and multiple comorbidities as risk factors for CDI in both subsets. On multivariate analyses for auto-SCT, there was significant correlation between age and the indication for transplant (P=.003), but the indication for either auto- or allo-SCT was not associated with CDI on multivariate analyses. The following factors were found to be associated with CDI: septicemia (auto-SCT odds ratio [OR],=1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35–2; and allo-SCT OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.36–2.1), male gender (auto-SCT OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09–1.53; and allo-SCT OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.18–1.57), lengthy hospital stay (auto-SCT OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.29–3.45; and allo-SCT OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.15–3.22), and presence of multiple comorbidities (auto-SCT OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11–1.57; and allo-SCT OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.0–1.4).
CONCLUSIONSThe prevalence of CDI was higher among patients undergoing allo-SCT. CDI was significantly associated with longer hospital stay, septicemia, and male gender for auto- and allo-SCT recipients. While this analysis did not permit us to directly ascribe the associations to be causative for CDI, it identifies the more vulnerable population for CDI and provides a rationale for the development of more effective approaches to preventing CDI.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:651–657