17 results
4 - From Social Citizenship to Active Citizenship?: Tensions Between Policies and Practices in Finnish Elderly Care
- Edited by Janet Newman, Evelien Tonkens
-
- Book:
- Participation, Responsibility and Choice
- Published by:
- Amsterdam University Press
- Published online:
- 19 January 2021
- Print publication:
- 28 April 2011, pp 67-86
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
In this chapter, active citizenship is discussed in relation to elderly care policies and informal care practices in Finland. Active citizenship, in the way that Janet Newman and Evelien Tonkens define the notion in the introduction of this book, composes the main conceptual frame for our analysis. We will demonstrate that the ideal of social citizenship is giving way to active citizenship. The ideas of participation, responsibility and choice shape political norms and objectives within the policy discourse on elderly care; but active citizenship is also manifested in the everyday practices of informal care. As we will show, informal carers of older people might, however, bring a critical voice into the discourse and practice of active citizenship. We will also trace major tensions between the emerging political discourse on active citizenship and how it is materialised in everyday care practices. This brings into view questions of justice and equality: citizens (i.e., informal carers) have very different resources at their disposal, and access to social networks shapes their capabilities to bear and share care responsibilities.’
The chapter is structured as follows. We begin by setting the context for our study – public policy on care in Finland – then go on to describe and evaluate the official policy discourse on elderly care. We ask whether the idea(l) of active citizenship can be identified from the official policy discourse, and how far the three dimensions of active citizenship (participation, responsibility and choice) shape social care policy discourse and practice in Finland. We concentrate on elderly care arrangements at home and policies supporting these arrangements, since previous studies on informal care in Finland (see e.g. Anttonen, Zechner & Valokivi 2009) show how care provided by family members informally without pay or supported by payments for care schemes represents a strong political norm, leading to a new construction of care citizen (Ungerson 2004). In the third part, we focus on interviews with informal carers to find out how active citizenship discourse is materialising in everyday care situations. We pay attention to carers’ views on public participation and care responsibilities, and on the choices they make in the emerging market of social care.
four - Gendered citizenship: the care of young children
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 109-136
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
Since the 1990s, Western Europe has experienced a remarkable shift in political thinking about childcare. A profound politicisation of the relationship between the state and the family has generated renegotiations of the boundaries between public and private responsibilities in the care of young children. Parenting norms, parental responsibilities and relations are changing rapidly in many regions, while families and households are no longer expected to take full responsibility for the care of their children under school age. Policies aimed at reconciling paid work and childcare are accelerating these processes. With a special interest in the transformation of childcare – from private to shared collective responsibility and, in some welfare states, to a social right – this chapter takes as its starting point those policy shifts which are redefining access to various forms of childcare services and benefits as a social right of parents and children.
Within the European Union (EU) there is political agreement that childcare policies are essential in reducing gender inequalities and in changing the gendered nature of social and economic citizenship. This is most clearly evident in the Parental Leave Directive of 1996, the Recommendation on Childcare of 1992 and the targets set for the provision of childcare services at the European Council meeting in Barcelona in 2002. In fact, legislation and policy recommendations have redefined the young child's need for care as a responsibility of both the state and parents. Childcare policy reform has broadened the platform from which parents are entitled to make claims on the welfare state. The elaboration of public policies for the early childhood years is affecting the institutional arrangement between welfare states, families and labour markets, while childcare-related policies have added to the social and economic rights of mothers and fathers (Leira, 2002).
The transformation of childcare policies in Western Europe stands in stark contrast to the policy reforms since the early 1990s in those Central and Eastern European welfare states known in the 1970s and 1980s for their massive public investments in provisions for preschoolers (see Kamerman and Kahn, 1978, 1991; UNICEF, 1999; Heinen and Portet, 2004). Since the 1990s, the dramatic decline in the public provision of childcare services and benefits has meant a shrinking of the childcare-related social and economic rights of parents. The following analysis of national policy reforms covers Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the UK.
Part One - Historical and cross-national perspectives
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 15-16
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
one - Historical perspectives
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 17-46
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
As context matters, a cross-national European study of the meanings of the concept of citizenship must, first of all, take the distinctive historical backgrounds into account. Understandings of citizenship have not only changed over the course of time, but its multifaceted, different meanings also reflect both varied political and social histories and legal traditions and cultures in the respective European countries. When, in this chapter, special attention is paid to legal traditions and cultures as characteristic of particular trajectories of development, this is not intended as a reduction to a legal discourse; on the contrary, it is an attempt to be concrete and extend our view of political ideas or conceptualisations to what is called ‘lived experience’. For the notion of ‘legal cultures’ comprises more than norms, doctrines or institutions of a legal system, it also includes attitudes towards the state and the practical experiences of those who were excluded from citizenship rights or became involved with the law. Since citizenship is not only a legal status but also a practice and lived experience (Lister, 2003), the awareness of the significance of legal cultures, therefore, may contribute to an understanding of ‘citizenship regimes’ as ‘historical constructions’ (Jenson and Phillips, 2001) and may explain specific barriers to equal citizenship or particular trajectories of inclusion respectively. These legacies, different historical roots and legal cultures, political struggles as well as particular institutional trajectories, still shape today's discourses and have an impact on citizenship theory and practice. Of special interest are the ‘overlapping vocabularies’ of the different discourses and debates with respect to female citizenship that impeded the possibility of gender equality (Landes, 1996). This means that the history of women's citizenship has deviated from the development usually depicted in the traditional citizenship literature.
In this chapter, however, the attempt at exploring the different historical and political contexts cannot be complete; it must be restricted to an exemplary or ideal type of argumentation. Since ideal types are always theoretical exaggerations, which in reality never exist in pure form, they will be illustrated by exemplary historical features. After introducing the terminology of the legal tradition and the models of the modern concept of citizenship, the second part of the chapter will discuss the delays and the impediments to women's citizenship in the different dimensions of political, civil and social citizenship rights.
three - Gendered citizenship: migration and multiculturalism
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 77-108
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
Globalisation, European integration and migration pose new challenges for understanding citizenship from a transnational perspective. Since the 1990s the increase in migrants and refugees has sparked new political debates about multiculturalism and multicultural policies across Europe, debates which have, increasingly after 9/11, been coloured by Islamophobia. These debates follow both similar and diverging paths in different European countries, all of which carry different legacies of colonialism, imperialism, and different histories of migration. In some, the debates about multiculturalism are new; in others, such as the UK, they revive and reshape debates of the 1960s following post-war immigration. Along with these differences, the heterogeneity of groups and the policies and lived experiences also constitute aspects of recent and past migration. With increasing immigration restrictions in Europe, the only way to gain legal access to enter many countries has been through family unification or as refugees or, to a lesser extent, as workers with designated and required skills. Since the early 1980s female labour migration has increased along with a growing stratification between different migrant groups, according to qualifications and skills (Kofman et al, 2005).
The overall objective of this chapter is to explore the meaning of these challenges of migration and multiculturalism for gendered citizenship. The focus is on the intersection of gender with (minority) ethnicity, in terms of the rights and claims of minority ethnic women, in those nine European countries which are the subject of this book, taking into account their differing citizenship, migration and gender regimes. Multiculturalism is an ambiguous term that refers to principles that either respect minority rights or defend special rights for minority groups. The debates point to how public policies deal with difference and diversity, as well as normative visions about diversity, and strategies for achieving these visions. Multiculturalism is also highly complex because, as Chapter Five shows, policies and public discourses often differ from the lived practices of citizens.
Migration and multiculturalism represent a double challenge for the classic framing of citizenship in that they force us to analyse the tension between equality and recognition of diversity and the relationship between national and transnational arenas. Citizenship is about the inclusion and exclusion of individuals and social groups in societies where struggles over rights have been closely linked to the nation state.
Index
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 201-210
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
Part Two - Policy studies
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 75-76
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
Frontmatter
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp i-ii
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- New Challenges for Citizenship Research in a Cross-National Context
- Ruth Lister, Fiona Williams, Anneli Anttonen, Jet Bussemaker, Ute Gerhard, Jacqueline Heinen, Stina Johansson, Arnlaug Leira, Birte Siim, Constanza Tobio
- With Anna Gavanas
-
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007
-
This cross-national study explores a key concept in contemporary European political, policy and academic debates and demonstrates the value of a multi-level conceptualisation of citizenship.
two - Vocabularies of citizenship since the 1970s
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 47-74
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
In this chapter, we describe and analyse the range of actors involved in contemporary citizenship debates. These actors include left-wing and right-wing politicians, feminist movements, trade unions and social movements more generally. They may adhere to more dominant and powerful discourses on citizenship or struggle with alternative formulations, attacking mainstream or defending former interpretations. For all these reasons, it is not clear a priori whether citizenship is a liberating or a disciplinary concept; in fact, as stated in the Introduction, it can be both, depending on who is using the concept, in what context, and with reference to which kinds of vocabulary. From a gender perspective, such a contextualised analysis is especially important, since binaries such as public/private, dependence/independence, needs/rights, individual/community, may also be highly gendered, as well as context driven.
We focus here on those contextual issues concerning citizenship that have emerged within the European welfare states since the 1970s. We will start with asking why citizenship has become such a key concept. Then we will describe various contemporary vocabularies and feminist critiques of citizenship. In the next section, we examine some striking citizenship issues and debates in contemporary welfare states. Finally, we analyse the consequences of international developments for these vocabularies of citizenship, with a special focus on both European citizenship, and the framing of citizenship in former communist countries.
Social and political developments and the rise of the concept of citizenship
Within recent decades, citizenship has become an influential concept used in various spheres. Among academics it is used as a central concept to describe and explain developments within social and political transformation processes. In politics it is used to reformulate both the relations between citizens and the state, and relations among citizens. Within social movements and activist groups, it refers to questions of inequality, social cohesion and community life. In international organisations, such as the European Union (EU), the concept of citizenship appears to name and frame a shift in the position of the nation state and its citizens.
The main reason behind the popularity of the term ‘citizenship’ seems to be that so many contemporary issues and problems can be related to it. New questions have arisen as to the distribution of citizenship rights as a result of demographic developments, changing family and gender relations and welfare state reform.
Introduction
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 1-14
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Citizenship links the individual with the collective. This book too is the work of individual researchers who have worked collectively as an international team. The outcome is therefore not the more usual edited collection in which authors of individual chapters work with an editor. Rather it is the product of a collaborative process of iteration in which authors responsible for individual chapters have drawn on material provided by the whole team and members of the team have discussed and commented on each chapter. This process has helped to illuminate some of the challenges faced in researching citizenship in a cross-national context.
The introduction begins with an explanation of why it is necessary to understand citizenship in context. This is followed by a brief account of the meanings of citizenship and of feminist interpretations of them and, finally, an overview of the volume.
Citizenship in context
Citizenship can be understood both as an academic and political concept and as lived experience (Lister, 1997, 2003; Siim, 2000). Our analysis highlights three key elements of citizenship: rights and responsibilities, belonging and participation. The starting point for the volume and central theme running through it is that context matters. Although, as a concept, citizenship is typically constructed in abstract, universal terms, the universal nevertheless is interpreted and articulated in specific national social and political contexts, reflecting historical traditions and institutional and cultural complexes. Thus, for example, the British literature on citizenship has traditionally tended to focus on the relationship between individual citizens and the state, central to its liberal tradition; in contrast, the Scandinavian literature has been more likely than the British to emphasise the relations between citizens as a collectivity, reflecting the feelings of solidarity emanating from a long history of social democracy.
As lived experience, citizenship cannot be divorced from its context – temporal and national. Diverse aspects of gendered citizenship are salient at particular periods of time in different countries (see Chapters One and Two). Indeed, understandings of what it means to be a citizen, and the vocabularies used to capture these meanings, are likely to differ to some extent between European countries, as discussed in Chapter One. Moreover, within countries people may experience citizenship differently depending on factors such as age, class, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality and (dis)ability. These factors interact to weave the texture of lived citizenship for individual citizens (see also the Conclusion).
Contents
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp iii-iii
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
References
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 177-200
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
five - Gendered citizenship and home-based childcare: transnational dynamics
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 137-166
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
The previous chapters have examined changes in the perception and application of citizenship rights in relation to childcare provision and to migration and asylum. This chapter looks at what Chapter Four called the ‘transnational redistribution of care work’ – the ways migration and childcare intersect in the case of the private employment of migrant women as domestic and childcare workers in European households. This phenomenon has been referred to as ‘the global care chain’ (Ehrenreich and Hochschild, 2003) where women from poorer regions of the world migrate to care for the children and households of employed women in the West in order to support their own children who they leave in the care of female relatives in their countries of origin. Research on the care chain in Europe has exposed the highly oppressive nature of such work and the ways in which migration rules and regimes render women vulnerable, through lack of citizenship status, to work in the underpaid and undervalued grey economy of household labour (Phizacklea, 1998; Anderson, 2000; Kofman et al, 2000; Lutz, 2002; Cox, 2006). The chapter draws on empirical qualitative research in the UK, Spain and Sweden with both employers of migrant domestic/care workers and migrant women who carry out such work. While it reinforces some of the findings of research on domestic service, it seeks to focus more on the demand for childcare services and contextualise this in terms of wider social and policy changes. The chapter starts by looking at this context and outlines the many different and complexly connected dimensions of citizenship it invokes.
Domestic work is both a new and an old phenomenon. While such work had been commonplace in bourgeois homes in Europe up until the 1960s, it fell away with the mass use of domestic technology, with the increase of alternative work in the industrial and service sectors, as well as, in the Nordic social democratic countries, a repudiation on egalitarian grounds of the very idea of employing others to provide ‘service’. By the 1990s it became evident in Western and Southern Europe that the demand for such work was on the increase again (for Britain, see Gregson and Lowe, 1994), and in the major cities it was in part migrant women from the poorer regions of the world who were meeting this demand (Anderson, 1997).
List of authors
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp iv-iv
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
Conclusion
- Ruth Lister, Loughborough University, Fiona Williams, University of Leeds, Anneli Anttonen, Tampereen korkeakouluyhteisossa, Finland, Jet Bussemaker, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Ute Gerhard, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Jacqueline Heinen, Université Versailles/Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Stina Johansson, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, Arnlaug Leira, Universitetet i Oslo, Birte Siim, Aalborg Universitet Institut for Kultur og Globale Studier, Denmark, Constanza Tobio, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
- With Anna Gavanas, University of Leeds
-
- Book:
- Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 15 September 2022
- Print publication:
- 16 May 2007, pp 167-176
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
We have had two main objectives in writing this volume. The first, which originated in our longstanding collaboration in the research field of gendered citizenship, has been to explore the key challenges facing those who study citizenship in a cross-national context. The second has been to illustrate some of these challenges through an analysis of two important dimensions of gendered citizenship, which tend to be treated separately – care and migration – and to do so within a global context. In this brief conclusion we pull together a number of threads and raise some general issues for future research and policy making. The first part reflects on the challenges and the second expands on the fresh perspectives we believe our study offers to understandings of gendered citizenship in Europe.
Challenges
Our analysis throws up four key challenges in studying gendered citizenship in a cross-national context. These derive from: citizenship's contextual nature; the perspectives of ‘lived citizenship’; the inadequacy of existing cross-national data for our purposes; and the need to study the gender culture within which policy packages are enacted, together with their differential usage across gender, class and ethnic lines, in order to understand the policies’ meanings for and impact on gendered citizenship.
As we explained in the Introduction and Part One, context matters when understanding citizenship both as an academic and political concept and as lived experience. Vocabularies of citizenship may appear superficially similar in different countries but the meanings attached to the words are not always the same (Bellamy, 2004). Contemporary understandings of citizenship are the product of different historical and legal traditions and institutional and cultural complexes (frequently articulated in terms of welfare, care, gender, citizenship and migration regimes). They also reflect the processes by which citizenship rights came to be established – whether as the product of struggle from below or of anticipatory state action from above or a combination of both (Turner, 1990).
These statements are made on the basis of political and theoretical writings about citizenship. However, an even greater challenge faces us as we try to understand the lived experience of citizenship in a cross-national context. The notion of ‘lived citizenship’ is about ‘the meaning that citizenship actually has in people's lives and the ways in which people's social and cultural backgrounds and material circumstances affect their lives as citizens’ (Hall and Williamson, 1999, p 2).
six - Comparative approaches to social care: diversity in care production modes
- Edited by Birgit Pfau-Effinger, Birgit Geissler
-
- Book:
- Care and Social Integration in European Societies
- Published by:
- Bristol University Press
- Published online:
- 18 January 2022
- Print publication:
- 07 September 2005, pp 115-134
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Social care: divergent emphases
Social care is a growing concern in welfare states and an ever more frequent object of comparative social research. A greater focus on social care is necessary to construct a better understanding of the principles and functions of modern welfare states and family life. We start out from the view that social care arrangements are an integral part of the wider order and structure of a society, as Pfau-Effinger (1998), for instance, has suggested. The forms that care arrangements take are deeply rooted in social and cultural contexts and they vary considerably across countries and even inside one country (see Anttonen and Sipilä, 1996, 1997; Anttonen et al, 2003).
In this chapter, our aim is to describe and evaluate the processes in which social care is going public. By the concepts of social care and social care services, we will underline the role of the state and local governments as well as other formal service providers. Although our main focus is in formal care providers, it is of great importance to look at changing boundaries between the private and public responsibilities. Indeed, social care as a concept comprises care-giving work done both in the informal and in the formal settings (Daly and Lewis, 2000). In this chapter, social care relates both to care as work and care as public policy. Our intention is, first, to present a classification of care production modes in a welfare mix framework; second, to describe the processes of care going public by focusing on national social care patterns in five different countries; and third, to seek cultural explanations as to why they have developed into distinct systems and to understand why these countries are now adopting partly similar ways of rearranging social care. Since social care, as both work and policy, is so pervasive in a society, we have found it useful to restrict our analysis on the two dominant sectors of social care: the day-care of small children and the care of older people. The countries included in the analysis are Finland, Germany, Japan, the US and the UK.
The conclusions of this chapter are based on a cross-cultural comparison: an international research project with five national teams has been studying how social care patterns have been developed and how they respond to the needs of social care inside different societies.