1 results
7 - Clustering
- from Part III - Challenges Connected to CoMP
-
- By Patrick Marsch, Nokia Siemens Networks, Wroc law, Poland, Stefan Brück, Qualcomm CDMA Technologies GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany, Andrea Garavaglia, Qualcomm CDMA Technologies GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany, Matthias Schulist, Qualcomm CDMA Technologies GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany, Ralf Weber, Qualcomm CDMA Technologies GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany, Armin Dekorsy, University of Bremen
- Edited by Patrick Marsch, Gerhard P. Fettweis, Technische Universität, Dresden
-
- Book:
- Coordinated Multi-Point in Mobile Communications
- Published online:
- 05 August 2012
- Print publication:
- 21 July 2011, pp 139-160
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
As mentioned in previous chapters, CoMP has the capability to significantly enhance spectral efficiency and cell-edge throughput. However, CoMP may require additional signaling overhead on the air interface and the backhaul, in particular joint signal processing CoMP as introduced in Chapter 6. Therefore, in practice only a limited number of base stations can cooperate in order to keep the overhead manageable. This raises the question which base stations should form cooperation clusters in order to exploit the advantages of CoMP efficiently at limited complexity.
In general, one can distinguish between static and dynamic clustering algorithms. Static clusters are kept constant over time and designed based on geographical criteria as the positions of base stations and the morphology of the surroundings. In the case of dynamic clustering, the system continuously adapts the clustering strategy to changing parameters such as user equipment (UE) locations and radio frequency (RF) conditions. Here, the central question is on which information the adaptation of clusters shall be based, and where in the system clustering decisions are made.
To illustrate concrete clustering results and their corresponding performance, we use two different setups in this chapter. On one hand, we consider an idealistic setup, i.e. a hexagonal layout of up to M = 111 cells, grouped into sites of 3 cells each, with an inter-site distance (ISD) of 500 m.