We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Right to Science (RtS) adds an important legal and ethical dimension to fundamental issues in science. The authors propose a four-step framework, derived from Articles 2, 4 and 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which may be used as a practical means of testing policy choices and implications against the obligations derived from the right to science. The first step consists in identifying whether a given policy, product or aspect of science constitutes a “benefit of scientific progress” or “its applications.” Where this is the case, Article 15(1)(b) establishes a prima facie right to the aspect of science in question. However, the RtS is not absolute, and the second step of the framework involves testing the prima facie right against competing rights claims and the Article 2 and 4 limitation criteria. These establish that limitations to the right must be (1) determined by law; (2) compatible with the nature of the ICESCR rights; (3) invoked solely for the purpose of promoting the general welfare in a democratic society; (4) and consistent with fundamental human rights principles of inclusion, participation, non-discrimination and dignity.
Mikel Mancisidor explores how and under what circumstances the right to science entered the UDHR, and what the travaux préparatoire of the Declaration may tell us about why those who drafted the Declaration chose these precise words – what they intended to say, and what they avoided saying. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights started out as a succession of working drafts over one and a half years. The first draft was prepared by the Canadian jurist John Peters Humphrey, who had been appointed the first Director of the United Nations Division of Human Rights. This first draft, which is a very complete list of the rights that had been recorded in other declarations and reference texts, was then rearranged and converted into a more consistent declaration by the French jurist René Cassin. That draft subsequently had to pass the drafting Committee and the sessions of the Human Rights Commission before being approved by the ECOSOC and finally, on 10 December 1948, by the General Assembly in session at the Palais Chaillot in Paris, resulting in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that we know today.
That everyone has a human right to enjoy the benefits of the progress of science and its applications comes as a surprise to many. Nevertheless, this right is pertinent to numerous issues at the intersection of science and society: open access; 'dual use' science; access to ownership and dissemination of data, knowledge, methods and the affordances and applications thereof; as well as the role of international co-operation, human dignity and other human rights in relation to science and its products. As we advance towards superintelligence, quantum computing, drone swarms, and life-extension technology, serious policy decisions will be made at the national and international levels. The human right to science provides an ideal tool to do so, backed up as it is by international law, political heft, and normative weight. This book is the first sustained attempt at turning this wonder of foresight into an actionable and justiciable right. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.