2 results
3 - Thoughts on Thailand's Turmoil, 11 June 2010
-
- By James Stent, Beijing Cultural Heritage Protection Research Center
- Edited by Michael J. Montesano, Pavin Chachavalpongpun, Aekapol Chongvilaivan
-
- Book:
- Bangkok, May 2010
- Published by:
- ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
- Published online:
- 21 October 2015
- Print publication:
- 18 January 2012, pp 15-41
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
BACKGROUND
In the latter part of the 1990s, after the financial crisis of 1997, but before the ascent of Thaksin, I was occasionally asked to speak to groups of foreign investment analysts visiting Thailand. I set forth the gist of what I used to say to these analysts, as it gives context to my thoughts on the present turmoil:
Thailand is a country characterized by a high degree of ideological homogeneity, with broad consensus at all levels of society on the core values of Thailand and on what it means to be a Thai. This consensus includes veneration of the king, a leading role for the Buddhist religion, adherence to a free market economic system, support for a hierarchical society that emphasizes respect for superiors and seniors, provides an elevated position in society for Army, civil servants and police, and by implication leaves control of the nation in the hands of an establishment that sits at the top levels of the social pyramid. Over the decades, this establishment has instilled this view of the nation throughout all levels of society, with inculcation starting in the schools and reinforced continually through media, portraits of the royal family, etc. To dissent from the main elements of this consensus is to be “Un-Thai”. In fact, there have been few dissenters, and those that have bucked the consensus are marginalized, either through social pressure, or through police action. This consensus has made for a stable society in which people generally accept their place in life, but which also allows for sufficient social mobility to accommodate the bright and ambitious. Considerable economic development has occurred under this consensus and stability, and as a result the lot of poor villagers has improved substantially over the past half-century. The fears of many that communism would engulf the nation, as it had China and Indochina, have proven unwarranted.
This stable consensus has benefited the elite levels of society, a few thousand members of which control what happens in the country. This elite occupies the key positions in the bureaucracy, the military, police, business establishment (particularly banks), and clergy, in both Bangkok and in provincial cities(…)
An architecture for a generic dialogue shell
- JAMES ALLEN, DONNA BYRON, MYROSLAVA DZIKOVSKA, GEORGE FERGUSON, LUCIAN GALESCU, AMANDA STENT
-
- Journal:
- Natural Language Engineering / Volume 6 / Issue 3-4 / September 2000
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 March 2001, pp. 213-228
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
This paper describes our work on dialogue systems that can mimic human conversation, with the goal of providing intuitive access to a wide range of applications by expanding the user's options in the interaction. We concentrate on practical dialogue: dialogues in which the participants need to accomplish some objective or perform some task. Two hypotheses regarding practical dialogue motivate our research. First, that the conversational competence required for practical dialogues, while still complex, is significantly simpler to achieve than general human conversational competence. And second, that within the genre of practical dialogue, the bulk of the complexity in the language interpretation and dialogue management is independent of the task being performed. If these hypotheses are true, then it should be possible to build a generic dialogue shell for practical dialogue, by which we mean the full range of components required in a dialogue system, including speech recognition, language processing, dialogue management and response planning, built in such a way as to be readily adapted to new applications by specifying the domain and task models. This paper documents our progress and what we have learned so far based on building and adapting systems in a series of different problem solving domains.