We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A basic result of Anderson and May's (1982) early work on models of disease in natural (nonhuman) populations is that pathogen fitness is R0 = βN/(α + γ + d), where β is the horizontal transmission rate of the disease, α is the disease-induced mortality rate, d is the background mortality rate, γ is the recovery rate to the immune state, and N is host population density without the disease (see Boxes 2.1 and 2.2). In this model, pathogen strains that maximize β/(α + γ + d) competitively exclude all others. A key insight, however, is that trade-offs among fitness components prevent selection from driving horizontal transmission β to infinity, and mortality α and recovery γ to zero. For the mosquito-vectored rabbit disease myxomatosis, for example, virus strains that kill too rapidly have little chance of being transmitted, because mosquitoes do not bite dead rabbits. On the other hand, strains that kill too slowly produce such low concentrations of virus that they are also unlikely to be transmitted (Fenner 1983). Assuming that the rabbits evolve over a much longer time scale than does the virus, for such a constraint an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) exists at the maximum of β/(α + γ + d); compare Boxes 2.1, 2.2, and 5.1.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.