Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
Due to planned maintenance there will be periods of time where the website may be unavailable. We apologise for any inconvenience.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The borderline between the periods commonly termed "medieval" and "Renaissance", or "medieval" and "early modern", is one of the most hotly, energetically and productively contested faultlines in literary history studies. The essays presented in this volume both build upon and respond to the work of Professor Helen Cooper, a scholar who has long been committed to exploring the complex connectionsand interactions between medieval and Renaissance literature. The contributors re-examine a range of ideas, authors and genres addressed in her work, including pastoral, chivalric romance, early English drama, and the writings of Chaucer, Langland, Spenser and Shakespeare. As a whole, the volume aims to stimulate active debates on the ways in which Renaissance writers used, adapted, and remembered aspects of the medieval.
Andrew King is Lecturer in Medieval and Renaissance Literature at University College, Cork; Matthew Woodcock is Senior Lecturer in Medieval and Renaissance Literature at the University of East Anglia.
Contributors: Joyce Boro, Aisling Byrne, Nandini Das, Mary C. Flannery, Alexandra Gillespie, Andrew King, Megan G. Leitch, R.W. Maslen, Jason Powell,Helen Vincent, James Wade, Matthew Woodcock
Swetnam The Woman-Hater (performed 1617–19; published 1620) works very hard to publicise its connection to the eponymous character's namesake, Joseph Swetnam, and to the debate about women to which he contributed so vociferously. The paratext of the 1620 edition advertises the play's participation in contemporary discussions about the antagonism between the sexes: the complete title is Swetnam the Woman-Hater Arraigned by Women; the titlepage engraving portrays Swetnam's trial by a female court; and the prologue foregrounds the antagonism between the sexes and the ‘dayes tryall’ of ‘we, poore women’ (pro. 4, 3). Given that Swetnam only appears in six of the play's nineteen scenes, this may seem like a slightly deceptive marketing strategy intended to capitalise upon Swetnam's notoriety so that sales of printed copies and theatre admissions would increase. But whereas emphasising links to Swetnam is indeed clever advertising, it is not dishonest. In this essay I contend that Swetnam offers a profound meditation on the context and tenor of the debate about women in which the play participates and on the type of society necessary for such debate to flourish. Drawing on a foundational principle of early modern kingship, that the monarch's vice or virtue is reflected in his subjects, and coupling this with contemporaneous medical, humoural theory, the play demonstrates that an ill monarch results in a sick court in which ailing characters thrive and diseases proliferate. King Atticus's excessive grief unbalances his humours and his society, which is in turn afflicted by imbalances that manifest themselves most clearly in antagonism between the sexes and in misogyny, a mind-set that is pathologised as a medical condition in the play. Indeed, the king's corporeal and moral misbalance is reflected most obviously in the gender disharmony in the play. At the end of the play, Sicily's return to political stability is signalled by the restoration of balance: the king's humoural equilibrium returns; mercy and justice are balanced; and women and men, femininity and masculinity, coexist harmoniously.
After providing a brief overview of the play's sources, this essay analyses Atticus's melancholy, arguing that it is a disease with socio-political implications because it infects the king's body and the body politic.