1 results
14 - Children's Eyewitness Memory: True Disclosures and False Reports
-
- By Jennifer M. Schaaf, Investigator Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Kristen Weede Alexander, Doctoral candidate in human development University of California, Davis, Gail S. Goodman, Professor of Psychology University of California, Davis, Simona Ghetti, Doctoral candidate in the Department of Psychology University of California, Davis, Robin S. Edelstein, doctoral student in the Department of Psychology University of California, Davis, Paola Castelli, Laurea in psychology University “La Sapienza” in Rome
- Edited by Bette L. Bottoms, University of Illinois, Chicago, Margaret Bull Kovera, Florida International University, Bradley D. McAuliff, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
-
- Book:
- Children, Social Science, and the Law
- Published online:
- 24 July 2009
- Print publication:
- 10 June 2002, pp 342-377
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Hand in hand with society's increased awareness of the problem of child abuse has come an increased presence of children as eyewitnesses in the legal system. Whether testifying as victims in open court or providing bystander eyewitness reports in a forensic interview, children have a good deal of valuable information to give the justice system, and in cases that rely largely on eyewitness evidence, a just outcome may rest on the testimony of a child. Despite children's strengths and abilities as eyewitnesses, children's memory, like that of adults, is not infallible, and children in some situations may be more susceptible to minor and serious error than adults. In this chapter, we overview how children perform when called on to provide eyewitness information about experienced events and also how they perform when questioned about never-experienced events. The chapter is divided into four main sections: disclosure of abuse, trauma and memory, false memory, and current trends in legal and research arenas. Overall,weargue that (a) children are often, although not always hesitant to disclose abuse; (b) children have the capacity for accurate memories of abusive experiences; (c) many children can, to a certain degree, resist suggestive questions about abuse, although some children (especially preschoolers) are more prone to false report, especially in multiply suggestive contexts; and (d) the current focus on false reports and false memory, although clearly important, often overstates the problem of children's suggestibility about abuse and risks disbelief of child witnesses when belief is justified (for discussion, see also Lyon, this volume).