3 results
Impact of a monthly antimicrobial stewardship quality assurance tool for elevated vancomycin levels
- Olivia C. Knack, Alice M. Landayan, Kelsey N. Williams, Lee M. Amaya, Timothy P. Gauthier
-
- Journal:
- Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology / Volume 3 / Issue 1 / 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 15 March 2023, e51
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Objective:
We sought to determine the value of an audit-and-feedback monitoring method in facilitating meaningful practice changes to improve vancomycin dosing and monitoring.
Design:Retrospective, multicenter, before-and-after implementation observational quality assurance initiative.
Setting:The study was conducted in 7 not-for-profit, acute-care hospitals within a health system in southern Florida.
Methods:The preimplementation period (September 1, 2019, through August 31, 2020) was compared to the postimplementation period (September 1, 2020, through May 31, 2022). All vancomycin serum-level results were screened for inclusion. The primary end point was the rate of fallout, defined as vancomycin serum level ≥25 µg/mL with acute kidney injury (AKI) and off-protocol dosing and monitoring. Secondary end points included the rate of fallout with respect to AKI severity, rate of vancomycin serum levels ≥25 µg/mL, and average number of serum-level evaluations per unique vancomycin patient.
Results:In total, 27,611 vancomycin levels were analyzed from 13,910 unique patients. There were 2,209 vancomycin serum levels ≥25 µg/mL (8%) among 1,652 unique patients (11.9%). AKI was identified in 379 unique patients (23%) with a vancomycin levels ≥25 µg/mL. In total, 60 fallouts (35.2%) occurred in the 12-month preimplementation period (∼5 per month) and 41 fallouts (19.6%) occurred in the 21-month postimplementation period (∼2 per month; P = .0006). Failure was the most common AKI severity in both periods (risk: 35% vs 24.3%, P = .25; injury: 28.3% vs 19.5%, P = .30; failure: 36.7% vs 56%, P = .053). Overall, the number of evaluations of vancomycin serum levels per unique patient remained consistent throughout both periods (2 vs 2; P = .53).
Conclusions:Implementation of a monthly quality assurance tool for elevated outlier vancomycin levels can improve dosing and monitoring practices resulting in enhanced patient safety.
Use of a Beta-Lactam Graded Challenge Process at an Academic Medical Center
- Andrew Watkins, Lee Amaya, Macey Wolfe, John Schoen, Erica Stohs, Sara May, Mark Rupp, Trevor Craig Van Schooneveld, Bryan Alexander, Scott Bergman
-
- Journal:
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology / Volume 41 / Issue S1 / October 2020
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 November 2020, p. s502
- Print publication:
- October 2020
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Background: A penicillin allergy guidance document containing an algorithm for challenging penicillin allergic patients with β-lactams was developed by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). As part of this algorithm, a “graded challenge” order set was created containing antimicrobial orders and safety medications along with monitoring instructions. The process is designed to challenge patients at low risk of reaction with infusions of 1% of the target dose, then 10%, and finally the full dose, each 30 minutes apart. We evaluated outcomes from the order set. Methods: Orders of the graded challenge over 17 months (March 2018 through July 2019) were reviewed retrospectively. Data were collected on ordering and outcomes of the challenges and allergy documentation. Use was evaluated based on ASP-recommended indications: history of IgE-mediated or unknown reaction plus (1) no previous β-lactam tolerance and the reaction occurred >10 years ago, or (2) previous β-lactam tolerance, now requiring a different β-lactam for treatment. Only administered challenges were included and descriptive statistics were utilized. Results: Of 67 orders, 57 graded challenges were administered to 56 patients. The most common allergies were penicillins (87.7%) and cephalosporins (38.6%), with the most common reactions being unknown (41.7%) or hives (22%). The most common antibiotics challenged were ceftriaxone (43.9%), cefepime (21.1%), and cefazolin (5.3%). Antibiotics given prior to challenge included vancomycin (48.2%), fluoroquinolones (35.7%), carbapenems (21.4%), aztreonam (19.6%), and clindamycin (12.5%). The median duration of challenged antibiotic was 6 days. The infectious diseases service was consulted on 59.6% of challenges and 75.4% of challenges were administered in non-ICU settings. There was 1 reaction (1.8%) involving a rash with the second infusion, which was treated with oral diphenhydramine and had no lasting effects. Based on indications, 80.7% of challenges were aligned with ASP guidance criteria. The most common use outside of these criteria was in patients without IgE-mediated reactions (10.5%). Most of these had minor rashes and could have received a full dose of a cephalosporin. Allergy information was updated in the electronic health record after 91.2% of challenges. Conclusions: We demonstrated the utility of a graded challenge process at our academic medical center. It was well tolerated, ordered frequently by noninfectious diseases clinicians, administered primarily in non-ICU settings, and regularly resulted in updated allergy information in the medical record. With many patients initially receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics with high costs or increased rates of adverse effects, graded challenges can potentially prevent the use of suboptimal therapies with minimal time and resource investment.
Funding: None
Disclosures: Scott Bergman reports a research grant from Merck.
The science of EChO
- Giovanna Tinetti, James Y-K. Cho, Caitlin A. Griffith, Olivier Grasset, Lee Grenfell, Tristan Guillot, Tommi T. Koskinen, Julianne I. Moses, David Pinfield, Jonathan Tennyson, Marcell Tessenyi, Robin Wordsworth, Alan Aylward, Roy van Boekel, Angioletta Coradini, Therese Encrenaz, Ignas Snellen, Maria R. Zapatero-Osorio, Jeroen Bouwman, Vincent Coudé du Foresto, Mercedes Lopez-Morales, Ingo Mueller-Wodarg, Enric Pallé, Franck Selsis, Alessandro Sozzetti, Jean-Philippe Beaulieu, Thomas Henning, Michael Meyer, Giuseppina Micela, Ignasi Ribas, Daphne Stam, Mark Swain, Oliver Krause, Marc Ollivier, Emanuele Pace, Bruce Swinyard, Peter A.R. Ade, Nick Achilleos, Alberto Adriani, Craig B. Agnor, Cristina Afonso, Carlos Allende Prieto, Gaspar Bakos, Robert J. Barber, Michael Barlow, Peter Bernath, Bruno Bézard, Pascal Bordé, Linda R. Brown, Arnaud Cassan, Céline Cavarroc, Angela Ciaravella, Charles Cockell, Athéna Coustenis, Camilla Danielski, Leen Decin, Remco De Kok, Olivier Demangeon, Pieter Deroo, Peter Doel, Pierre Drossart, Leigh N. Fletcher, Matteo Focardi, Francois Forget, Steve Fossey, Pascal Fouqué, James Frith, Marina Galand, Patrick Gaulme, Jonay I. González Hernández, Davide Grassi, Matt J. Griffin, Ulrich Grözinger, Manuel Guedel, Pactrick Guio, Olivier Hainaut, Robert Hargreaves, Peter H. Hauschildt, Kevin Heng, David Heyrovsky, Ricardo Hueso, Pat Irwin, Lisa Kaltenegger, Patrick Kervella, David Kipping, Geza Kovacs, Antonino La Barbera, Helmut Lammer, Emmanuel Lellouch, Giuseppe Leto, Mercedes Lopez Morales, Miguel A. Lopez Valverde, Manuel Lopez-Puertas, Christophe Lovi, Antonio Maggio, Jean-Pierre Maillard, Jesus Maldonado Prado, Jean-Baptiste Marquette, Francisco J. Martin-Torres, Pierre Maxted, Steve Miller, Sergio Molinari, David Montes, Amaya Moro-Martin, Olivier Mousis, Napoléon Nguyen Tuong, Richard Nelson, Glenn S. Orton, Eric Pantin, Enzo Pascale, Stefano Pezzuto, Ennio Poretti, Raman Prinja, Loredana Prisinzano, Jean-Michel Réess, Ansgar Reiners, Benjamin Samuel, Jorge Sanz Forcada, Dimitar Sasselov, Giorgio Savini, Bruno Sicardy, Alan Smith, Lars Stixrude, Giovanni Strazzulla, Gautam Vasisht, Sandrine Vinatier, Serena Viti, Ingo Waldmann, Glenn J. White, Thomas Widemann, Roger Yelle, Yuk Yung, Sergey Yurchenko
-
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union / Volume 6 / Issue S276 / October 2010
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 November 2011, pp. 359-370
- Print publication:
- October 2010
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
The science of extra-solar planets is one of the most rapidly changing areas of astrophysics and since 1995 the number of planets known has increased by almost two orders of magnitude. A combination of ground-based surveys and dedicated space missions has resulted in 560-plus planets being detected, and over 1200 that await confirmation. NASA's Kepler mission has opened up the possibility of discovering Earth-like planets in the habitable zone around some of the 100,000 stars it is surveying during its 3 to 4-year lifetime. The new ESA's Gaia mission is expected to discover thousands of new planets around stars within 200 parsecs of the Sun. The key challenge now is moving on from discovery, important though that remains, to characterisation: what are these planets actually like, and why are they as they are?
In the past ten years, we have learned how to obtain the first spectra of exoplanets using transit transmission and emission spectroscopy. With the high stability of Spitzer, Hubble, and large ground-based telescopes the spectra of bright close-in massive planets can be obtained and species like water vapour, methane, carbon monoxide and dioxide have been detected. With transit science came the first tangible remote sensing of these planetary bodies and so one can start to extrapolate from what has been learnt from Solar System probes to what one might plan to learn about their faraway siblings. As we learn more about the atmospheres, surfaces and near-surfaces of these remote bodies, we will begin to build up a clearer picture of their construction, history and suitability for life.
The Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory, EChO, will be the first dedicated mission to investigate the physics and chemistry of Exoplanetary Atmospheres. By characterising spectroscopically more bodies in different environments we will take detailed planetology out of the Solar System and into the Galaxy as a whole.
EChO has now been selected by the European Space Agency to be assessed as one of four M3 mission candidates.