We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Samson Agonistes is a difficult text to negotiate in the twenty-first century. The new face of terrorism and the war against terror, the currency of terms like jihad and suicide bombings in everyday vocabulary, the justifications suggested for many forms of the culture of violence in many corners of the world today cannot but have an impact on the way we now read Samson Agonistes. A ‘new alternative Samson’ had begun to emerge some time ago, reaching its culmination in John Carey's reading and in Joseph Wittreich's Interpreting Samson Agonistes, a Samson whose story is not an allegory of redemption but one of violence, lust and rash presumptions of divine guidance. More recently, in Shifting Contexts: Reinterpreting Samson Agonistes and Altering Eyes: New Perspectives on Samson Agonistes, as well as other recent works, Wittreich and other scholars have sought to open up a text long regarded as one to be examined for its conformity to scriptural traditions. The new readings begin with the beliefs
first, that Samson Agonistes is uncertain in its meanings, a deeply ambiguous text; second, that it is informed not by one but a multiplicity of traditions, each of them often in conflict, each of them just as often conflicted; and third, that if Milton's tragedy is inexplicable ‘in isolation from its scriptural source(s)’ and their ‘dialogic interplay’ in the poem […], those scriptural contexts are, as has not always been recognized, inextricably involved with the classical tradition of tragedy.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.