We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Benzodiazepine use disorder (BUD) has been associated with the presence of suicidal ideation (SI) in general population. It seems there is an overall increase in the risk of attempting suicide due to the increase of impulsivity, rebound and withdrawal of those who use benzodiazepines(1). However, this association has been scarcely studied.
Objectives
To explore the prevalence, clinical features and factors related to lifetime SI in adults with BUD.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted in an outpatient center for addiction treatment between 01/01/2010 and 12/31/2021. Adult patients who met criteria for active BUD were included. Patients with language barriers, cognitive impairments and those who were participating in any clinical trial were excluded. All patients were evaluated with an ad-hoc questionnaire, EuropASI (European Addiction Severity Index), BDI (Beck Depression Inventory) and HRQoL SF-36 (Health-related quality of life according to SF-36). Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed comparing BUD patients with or without SI.
Results
554 patients were included (65.2% males; M age 42.6±12.6 years). SI was reported in 57.2% of the patients. Regarding the sociodemographic variables, any type of lifetime abuse was correlated with SI (67.8%, 73.5% and 77.8% of the patients with emotional, physical and sexual abuse respectively). Considering the different psychiatric features studied, having any psychiatric diagnosis increased SI up to 64%. Depressive and cluster B personality disorders were the ones with a higher presence of SI (67.1% and 68.1% respectively). Anxiety and cluster A personality disorders had also higher proportions of SI (56.1% and 58,7% respectively). Regarding the different assessment instruments used, a higher punctuation on BDI score was seen in the group of patients with SI (23.73±12.86). The scores also showed a worse perception of the mental quality of life of those people with SI, measured by HRQoL (13.76 and 36.82±31.93 in patients with SI and no SI respectively). Considering the EuropASI, there was an increased proportion of SI in those patients with a worse familiar situation (0.44±0.30), a higher alcohol consumption (0.26±0.28) and a worse psychological condition (0.48±0.24).
Conclusions
The prevalence of SI in patients with BUD is significative and is related to several clinical factors. Those factors should be taken into account in daily clinical practice, research, and any health policies on suicide. Further research should be developed.
1. Dodds, T.J. ‘Prescribed benzodiazepines and suicide risk’, The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders 2017; 19(2).
To synthesize evidence and identify gaps in the literature on environmental cleaning and disinfection in the operating room based on a human factors and systems engineering approach guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model.
Design:
A systematic scoping review.
Methods:
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched 4 databases (ie, PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, CINAHL) for empirical studies on operating-room cleaning and disinfection. Studies were categorized based on their objectives and designs and were coded using the SEIPS model. The quality of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies with a nonequivalent groups design was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials.
Results:
In total, 40 studies were reviewed and categorized into 3 groups: observational studies examining the effectiveness of operating-room cleaning and disinfections (11 studies), observational study assessing compliance with operating-room cleaning and disinfection (1 study), and interventional studies to improve operating-room cleaning and disinfection (28 studies). The SEIPS-based analysis only identified 3 observational studies examining individual work-system components influencing the effectiveness of operating-room cleaning and disinfection. Furthermore, most interventional studies addressed single work-system components, including tools and technologies (20 studies), tasks (3 studies), and organization (3 studies). Only 2 studies implemented interventions targeting multiple work-system components.
Conclusions:
The existing literature shows suboptimal compliance and inconsistent effectiveness of operating-room cleaning and disinfection. Improvement efforts have been largely focused on cleaning and disinfection tools and technologies and staff monitoring and training. Future research is needed (1) to systematically examine work-system factors influencing operating-room cleaning and disinfection and (2) to redesign the entire work system to optimize operating-room cleaning and disinfection.