2 results
Chapter 28 - Occupations, Professions and Routine Dynamics
- from Part III - Themes in Routine Dynamics Research
-
- By Joanna Kho, Paul Spee
- Edited by Martha S. Feldman, University of California, Irvine, Brian T. Pentland, Michigan State University, Luciana D'Adderio, University of Edinburgh, Katharina Dittrich, University of Warwick, Claus Rerup, David Seidl
-
- Book:
- Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics
- Published online:
- 11 December 2021
- Print publication:
- 16 December 2021, pp 380-396
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
This chapter considers how facets of occupations and professions manifest in routine dynamics. Whilst the salience of occupations and professions on routines has been recognized in extant research on routine dynamics, it remains largely scattered. To illuminate the salience of occupations and professions in the literature on routine dynamics, which is multifaceted, we focus on three prominent research themes: skilful accomplishment (i.e., how actors perform tasks), interdependence (i.e., how actors collaborate to accomplish tasks) and truces (i.e., how actors compete to make exclusive claims to perform certain activities). We turn to the literature on professions and occupations to draw out theoretical and empirical intersections with research advocating routine dynamics. The analytical framework, comprised of a becoming lens, a doing lens and a relating lens corresponds with and provides the basis to advance research themes within routine dynamics. We suggest a stronger emphasis on occupations and professions holds promise for deepening knowledge about routine dynamics, which we articulate by proposing several avenues for future research, including the expansion of the concept of routines and a distinction between organizational and professional routines.
33 - The role of materiality in the practice of strategy
- from Part V - Substantive Topic Areas
- Edited by Damon Golsorkhi, Linda Rouleau, David Seidl, Universität Zürich, Eero Vaara
-
- Book:
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Published online:
- 05 October 2015
- Print publication:
- 03 September 2015, pp 582-597
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
While spatial and material aspects are fundamental to accomplishing any organizational activity and process, these have largely been neglected or treated as mere background in theoretical accounts that explain phenomena such as strategic change. This dearth of research exploring the role of materials has inspired ‘material turns’ in the fields of social studies of finance (for example, MacKenzie 2006; Pinch and Swedberg 2008), organizational routines (for example, D'Adderio 2011; Pentland et al. 2012) and technology studies (for example, Orlikowski 2007; Orlikowski and Scott 2008). Although multiple approaches exist that could shed light on the consequentiality of materiality for strategizing, at present these are not explicitly discussed in the literature.
To establish a research agenda for strategy as practice scholars, this chapter provides an overview of different philosophical approaches and empirical traditions to materiality, explaining the assumptions inherent in each approach and how these assumptions alter the way we understand and study strategizing. When possible, we illustrate the approaches with examples from strategy as practice. In so doing, we develop a typology of materiality that researchers might draw upon to guide their own work. Critically, while this typology is conceptually helpful to better understand the different ways in which one may view and work with materiality, we do not see the approaches as absolutely distinct. Rather, we see them as operating on a sliding scale; some approaches may be blended relatively effortlessly, while others would be impossible to combine given their opposing assumptions. In introducing these approaches, we aim to critically engage with the notion of materiality, encouraging the reader to see materiality as something that goes beyond mere physicality.
In line with these aims, our chapter is structured as follows. We briefly review the philosophical foundations of materiality to demonstrate the rich and diverse origins of the construct. We then introduce four empirical traditions to materiality: the communications approach, the technological approach, the sensemaking approach and the positivist approach. Reflecting on these approaches and their utility to SAP research, we draw up an agenda for future research. Herein we suggest the following as particularly fruitful avenues for research: time and space, and emotion and identity; connecting important levels of analysis, such as institutions and practice; drawing on innovative methods; and, most critically, using materiality to prompt new research questions that will significantly alter our understanding of organizations.
Philosophical approaches to materiality