2 results
OP119 Collectively Improving The Quality Use Of Highly Specialized Medicines: Starting With Biologics
- Jonathan Dartnell, Sue Brown, Louise Hardy, Claire Barrett, Rachelle Buchbinder, Sam Whittle, Lisa Pulver, Nena Nikolic, Debra Rowett, Kylee Hayward, Catherine Hill
-
- Journal:
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care / Volume 39 / Issue S1 / December 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 14 December 2023, p. S33
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
In contrast to high-volume medicines prescribed by general practitioners, low-volume highly specialized medicines have not been supported by national quality use of medicine (QUM) programs in Australia. The first area addressed has focused on optimizing use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).
MethodsThe program was designed, developed and implemented in partnership with nine consortium member organizations and four affiliate organizations representing consumer and clinical audiences, program development expertize and implementation capability. The common agenda for the collective impact approach was to achieve better health outcomes for people with inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and plaque psoriasis. Multidisciplinary expert working groups reviewed formative QUM research and agreed on objectives, audiences, messages and interventions. Interventions were selected based on identified barriers, enablers and behavioral drivers, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Interventions were co-designed and tested with end-users. Marketing and promotion activity supported implementation of all interventions through consortium channels and networks. Evaluation includes process, impact and outcome measures, and a realist evaluation of the academic detailing.
ResultsProgram objectives were to optimize: (i) first-line therapy before bDMARD use; (ii) first-choice bDMARDs; (iii) biosimilar prescribing and dispensing; (iv) bDMARD dosage; (v) glucocorticoid and analgesic use. Over 60 interventions supporting key messages for each objective were developed for audiences: consumers; rheumatologists, gastroenterologists, dermatologists; pharmacists; drug and therapeutic committees. Interventions implemented between September 2020 and September 2022 included: consumer decision aids, action plans, fact sheets, lived experience videos; living guidelines and evidence summaries; guidance/position statements for hospitals, podcasts, webinars, online learning; prescribing feedback reports; and academic detailing. Uptake of interventions has largely met targets and surveys have demonstrated shifts in specialist and consumer knowledge and behavior in line with key messages and objectives. Realist and outcome evaluation is ongoing.
ConclusionsOur experience demonstrates the value of a consortium of stakeholder organizations, with different expertise and interests but agreed goals and roles, working together to progress the quality use of highly specialized drugs.
OP84 Collaborative Program To Improve Early Management Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Jonathan Dartnell, Jane London, Jeffrey Elliott, Catherine Hill, Rachelle Buchbinder
-
- Journal:
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care / Volume 35 / Issue S1 / 2019
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 31 December 2019, p. 21
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
Optimal rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management requires coordinated management and consistent communication by health practitioners with patients. Suboptimal methotrexate use is a factor leading to increased use of biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), which account for significant government drug expenditure. A multidisciplinary co-design approach was used to develop and implement a program aiming to improve early management and quality use of medicines (QUM) for people with RA in Australia.
MethodsLiterature review and key informant interviews identified broad potential QUM issues in RA management. An initial exploratory multidisciplinary meeting prioritized QUM issues, identified audiences and perspectives, and scoped focus areas to address with education. Iteratively through co-design meetings and activities, program objectives were agreed, barriers and enablers for change explored, characteristics of intervention activities considered and rated, and program products developed and reviewed. Program evaluation included participation and distribution data, surveys and interviews, and analyses of general practice and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data.
ResultsQUM issues addressed include: (i) timely initiation of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs; (ii) appropriate use and persistence with csDMARD therapy, especially methotrexate; and (iii) clarity around professional roles and best practice for prescribing, dispensing, and monitoring DMARDs, and managing lifestyle factors and other risks associated with RA. The educational program (October 2017 to June 2018) included: an article promoting key messages (email to ~115,000 health practitioners), prescriber feedback report based on PBS data (to all Australian rheumatologists), an RA action plan (completed by health practitioners for consumers), an interactive case study (553 participants), visits to 1200 pharmacies promoting key messages, a multidisciplinary webinar (431 live and 366 on-demand), fact sheets for consumers available through MedicineWise app (medicine management app for consumers), and social media activity.
ConclusionsA multidisciplinary co-design process has provided a model for developing a multifaceted QUM program incorporating and addressing multiple perspectives.