We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Little is known about the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in French cancer patients. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a screening procedure using the Psychological Distress Scale (PDS). The PDS is a French adaptation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer. The screening performance of the PDS was assessed by comparison with the established clinical case threshold on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Methods:
Among 598 consecutive cancer outpatients recruited in two cancer centers in Paris, 561 (94%) agreed to complete the PDS, the HADS, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and study-specific psychosocial questions.
Results:
A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, using a HADS cutoff score of 15 or greater to identify patients with psychological distress. This yielded a PDS cutoff score of 3, giving 76% sensitivity and 82% specificity. With this cutoff score, the prevalence of psychological distress was 38%. PDS scores were significantly related to scores from the HAD total scale (r = .64), HAD anxiety (r = .61) and HAD depression (r = .39) subscales, and EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning (r = .56) and global health state (r = .44). In multivariate analyses, factors associated with psychological distress were female gender, taking analgesics, receiving professional psychological help, perceived psychosocial difficulties and lack of social support.
Significance of results:
Using the PDS appeared feasible, acceptable and effective for psychological distress screening in French ambulatory cancer care settings.
By
Pierre O. Chappuis, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,
Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Institut Curie, Paris, France,
Bernard Asselain, Institut Curie, Paris, France,
William D. Foulkes, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Sir M. B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Determining the outcome following hereditary breast cancer is one of the key questions in clinical breast cancer genetics. There is increasing evidence that BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancers are distinguishable from non-hereditary breast cancers: hereditary cancers demonstrate gene expression profiles and somatic genetic changes that are distinct from those seen in sporadic breast cancers and feature histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics usually associated with a worse prognosis. Despite these findings, conflicting data exist as to whether the prognosis of hereditary breast cancer differs from that of sporadic cases. Some of the discrepancies may be explained by methodological differences or biases. However, no mutation-based studies have shown a survival advantage for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and several unrelated studies have recently found that the presence of a BRCA1/2 mutation was an independent poor prognostic factor. Regarding the risk of further or recurrent breast cancer, it is established that the risk of contralateral breast cancer is significantly increased in breast cancer patients harbouring BRCA1/2 germline mutations, but surprisingly, during the first 5 years after diagnosis, an increase in the rate of ipsilateral breast recurrences has not been found. These data suggest that radiation may protect against, or at least delay, ipsilateral recurrences.
Introduction
Up to five per cent of breast cancer cases are hereditary and germline mutations in the breast cancer predisposing genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 may account for 65–80% of the hereditary cases (Ford et al., 1998; Rahman and Stratton, 1998).
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.