7 results
Psychiatric Inpatient Healthcare Resource Utilization and Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Predominant Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia
- Rashmi Patel, Darshan Mehta, Aditi Kadakia, Yida Won, Carole Dembek, Gwilym Williams, Xueyan Huang, Courtney Zeni, Andrei Pikalov
-
- Journal:
- CNS Spectrums / Volume 28 / Issue 2 / April 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 14 April 2023, pp. 222-223
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
Currently approved treatments for schizophrenia (antipsychotics) have demonstrated effectiveness for treating positive symptoms; however, these agents are largely ineffective in treating other domains. Negative symptoms, including avolition, alogia, blunted affect, and asociality, are difficult to treat, and often persist despite adequate control of positive symptoms. Additionally, some patients experience “predominant” (moderate-to-severe negative symptoms that have greater relative severity than co-occurring positive symptoms) or “prominent” (severity of negative symptoms [moderate-to-severe] without any reference to positive symptoms) negative symptoms. These symptoms are known to have great impact on patient social functioning and quality of life, and are associated with poorer clinical course and outcomes for patients. Here, we examined inpatient healthcare resource utilization in patients with schizophrenia experiencing predominantly negative symptoms (PNS).
MethodsDe-identified data were extracted from electronic health records in the NeuroBlu Database across 25 US mental healthcare providers. Positive and negative symptom data were derived from free-text records using natural language processing. PNS was defined as the presence of three or more negative symptoms and three or fewer positive symptoms at first clinical contact following schizophrenia diagnosis. Groups were balanced for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics by minimizing the generalized Mahalanobis distance and compared using chi-square and t-tests. Treatment patterns were visualized using Sankey diagrams.
ResultsA total of 4444 patients with schizophrenia were identified and 8% were classified as PNS. A balanced cohort of 720 patients (50% PNS) was generated. Patients with PNS were more likely to be hospitalized in the 12 months following diagnosis (PNS: 76%, non-PNS: 60%, χ2: 22.5, p < 0.001) and were switched to a second-line antipsychotic after a shorter first-line treatment duration. The most frequently prescribed antipsychotics differed between groups (PNS: risperidone, aripiprazole, haloperidol; non-PNS: risperidone, olanzapine, other atypical).
DiscussionThis study demonstrates that negative symptoms in schizophrenia may be associated with worse illness course and higher healthcare resource utilization. There remains a need for new treatment options for patients with persistent, prominent, or predominant negative symptoms which specifically improve this historically hard-to-treat and assess symptom domain.
FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
TAAR1 Agonist Ulotaront Improves Glycemic Control and Reduces Body Weight in Rodent Models of Diabetes, Obesity, and Iatrogenic Weight Gain
- Nina Dedic, Philip G. Jones, Eva Hajos-Korcsok, Colleen Synan, Serena Wu, Christoph Anacker, Steve P. Vickers, Jacob Hecksher-Sørensen, Courtney Zeni, Snezana Milanovic, Seth C. Hopkins, Linda J. Bristow, Kenneth S. Koblan
-
- Journal:
- CNS Spectrums / Volume 28 / Issue 2 / April 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 14 April 2023, p. 259
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
Preclinical evidence has identified the trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) as a novel regulator of metabolic control. Ulotaront is a TAAR1 and 5-HT1A agonist currently in Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we summarize preclinical results assessing the effects of ulotaront on weight and metabolic parameters.
MethodsEffects of ulotaront administration were evaluated on oral glucose tolerance (oGTT), gastric emptying, and in rodent models of weight gain (high-fat diet [HFD]-, corticosterone-, and olanzapine-induced).
ResultsFollowing 15-day oral administration of ulotaront, rats on HFD showed dose-dependent reduction in body weight, food intake, and liver triglyceride content compared to controls. In addition, a more rapid reversal of olanzapine-induced weight gain and food intake was observed in rats switched to ulotaront (vs. vehicle). Consistent with weight-lowering effects in rats, chronic ulotaront treatment normalized corticosterone-induced weight gain in mice. Assessment of oGTT showed a dose-dependent reduction of glucose excursion in response to acute ulotaront administration in naive and diabetic db/db mice. Ulotaront administration also delayed gastric emptying in mice—a likely mechanism driving reductions in glucose excursions during the oGTT. Whole-brain c-fos imaging of ulotaront-treated mice revealed increased neuronal activity in several brain regions associated with regulation of food intake and metabolic signals.
ConclusionsThe data indicate that ulotaront not only lacks metabolic liabilities typically associated with antipsychotics but can reduce body weight and improve glucose tolerance in rodent models. The underlying mechanisms may include TAAR1-mediated peripheral effects on glucose homeostasis and/or direct modulation of homeostatic and hedonic neurocircuits regulating energy balance. The beneficial metabolic effects of ulotaront may suggest a substantially improved risk-benefit profile compared to established antipsychotics.
FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Review of the Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 (TAAR1) Agonist Ulotaront: Part II—Summary of Initial Clinical Efficacy/Safety Results
- Seth C. Hopkins, Heather Dworak, Courtney Zeni, Kenneth S. Koblan
-
- Journal:
- CNS Spectrums / Volume 28 / Issue 2 / April 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 14 April 2023, p. 221
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with serotonin 5-HT1A agonist activity that has received FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we summarize ongoing clinical research characterizing the efficacy and safety of ulotaront as a member of the novel trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist class.
MethodsSummarized are results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulotaront (50 mg or 75 mg) in an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia, and a 6-month, open-label follow-up study. Also summarized are post-hoc analyses evaluating negative symptom efficacy, and key safety and adverse event (AE) outcomes.
ResultsIn the short-term study, treatment with ulotaront was associated with significant (p<0.001) endpoint improvement in the PANSS total score (effect size [ES]: 0.45), the CGI-Severity score (ES: 0.52) and the Brief Negative Symptom Scale total score (ES: 0.48). The incidence of any AE was lower on ulotaront versus placebo (45.8% vs. 50.4%), and the number needed to harm (NNH) for individual AEs on ulotaront were all >40. Ulotaront was associated with lower risk for antipsychotic class-related AEs (extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, somnolence, nausea/vomiting, increased weight/metabolic labs, prolactinemia). The 6-month study demonstrated further improvement, with a completion rate (67%) that was higher than reported for current dopamine D2 antipsychotics.
ConclusionsThe emerging profile of ulotaront is characterized by significant improvement in positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The safety and tolerability profile of ulotaront is markedly different with respect to antipsychotic class-related AEs. The benefit-risk profile of ulotaront, as a member of a novel TAAR1 agonist class, is distinguished from antipsychotics by lack of AEs related to D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor blockade.
FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Review of the TAAR1 Agonist Ulotaront: Part I—From Discovery to Clinic
- Seth C. Hopkins, Nina Dedic, Courtney Zeni, Colleen Synan, Kenneth S. Koblan
-
- Journal:
- CNS Spectrums / Volume 28 / Issue 2 / April 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 14 April 2023, p. 221
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
Trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) are a family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) first identified in 2001. TAAR1 has emerged as a promising therapeutic target due to its ability to modulate monoaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission. Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with serotonin 5-HT1A agonist activity that has received FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we provide a brief review of the discovery of ulotaront and preclinical research suggesting efficacy in schizophrenia, leading to the first clinical trial of ulotaront resulting in FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation.
MethodsUlotaront was discovered through a target-agnostic approach optimized to identify drug candidates that demonstrate an antipsychotic-like profile in vivo but lack D2 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonism. Ulotaront was further characterized by in vitro pharmacology, electrophysiology, behavioral, and imaging studies.
ResultsUlotaront demonstrated an antipsychotic-like profile in a high-throughput, phenotypic behavior screening platform, as well as efficacy in preclinical models of schizophrenia, including phencyclidine (PCP)-induced hyperactivity, prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle, and subchronic PCP-induced deficits in social interaction. Although not fully elucidated, ulotaront’s mechanism of action appears to be mediated by agonism at trace amine-associated 1 (TAAR1) and 5-HT1A receptors. This was further corroborated with whole cell patch clamp recordings, demonstrating inhibition of dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) neuronal firing via 5-HT1A and TAAR1 receptors. Furthermore, ulotaront attenuated the ketamine-induced increase in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, suggesting that it may modulate presynaptic dopamine dysfunction which is hypothesized to contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.
ConclusionsPreclinical studies have identified ulotaront as a TAAR1 agonist with antipsychotic-like activity. Ulotaront’s unique receptor profile led to its designation as a member of the new “-taront” class of TAAR1 agonists, distinct in pharmacology from the D2/5-HT2A class of antipsychotics. A companion poster will summarize the efficacy and safety of ulotaront based on initial clinical trials in schizophrenia.
FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Assessing the Benefit-Risk Ratio of Approved Treatments for Bipolar Depression Using Likelihood to be Helped or Harmed (LHH) Analyses
- Leslie Citrome, Michael Tocco, Courtney Zeni, Andrei Pikalov, Robert Goldman
-
- Journal:
- CNS Spectrums / Volume 26 / Issue 2 / April 2021
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 May 2021, p. 146
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Background
Four medications are FDA approved for bipolar depression: lurasidone (LUR), cariprazine (CAR), quetiapine IR & XR (QUE), and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination (OFC). Indirect comparisons for efficacy using Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and for tolerability using Number Needed to Harm (NNH) can be useful clinical benchmarks to aid treatment decisions. Benefit and risk may also be examined using the Likelihood to be Helped or Harmed (LHH). In this post-hoc analysis, we examined the benefit-risk ratio of the four treatments using LHH.
MethodIndividual and pooled monotherapy data from short-term clinical registration trials of patients with bipolar depression were assessed for LUR, CAR, pooled QUE (300 and 600 mg), and pooled OFC (considered as monotherapy for this study at fixed doses of 6/25, 6/50, 12/50 mg) data. NNT estimates were calculated using the proportions of MADRS responders (defined as ≥ 50% improvement at study endpoint) and MADRS remitters (defined as a score of ≤ 10 [for LUR and CAR] and ≤ 12 [for QUE and OFC]) at study endpoint. NNH data were calculated for the proportions of patients who discontinued due to an adverse event (AE) and for individual AEs commonly associated with each treatment. LHH was calculated as the ratio of NNH/NNT to determine the benefit-risk ratio.
ResultsThe NNT estimates for response vs. placebo were: 5 for both LUR 20–60 mg and 80–120 mg; 10 for both CAR 1.5 mg and 3.0 mg; 6 for QUE; and 4 for OFC. The NNTs for remission vs placebo were: 7 for LUR 20–60 mg and 9 for LUR 80–120 mg; 10 for CAR 1.5 mg and 13 for CAR 3.0 mg; 6 for QUE; and 5 for OFC. The NNH estimates for discontinuations due to AEs were: 642 for LUR 20–60 mg and −151 for LUR 80–120 mg; 298 for CAR 1.5 mg and 31 for CAR 3.0 mg; 10 for QUE; and −37 for OFC. NNH values that were negative were assigned a value of 1000 to permit LHH to be calculated. The LHHs for response vs discontinuation due to an AE were: 128.4 for LUR 20–60 mg and 200 for LUR 80–120 mg; 29.8 for CAR 1.5 mg and 3.1 for CAR 3.0 mg; 1.7 for QUE; and 250 for OFC. The LHHs for response vs akathisia were: 3.6 for LUR 20–60 mg and 2.4 for LUR 80–120 mg; 3.6 for CAR 1.5 mg and 1.3 for CAR 3.0 mg; 34 for QUE; and not available (NA) for OFC. The LHHs for response vs EPS were: 8 for LUR 20–60 mg and 3.2 for LUR 80–120 mg; 5 for CAR 1.5 mg and 2.5 for CAR 3.0 mg; NA for QUE; and NA for OFC. The LHH for response vs weight gain was 5.8 for LUR 20–60 mg and 1110 for LUR 80–120 mg; 5 for both doses of CAR; 2.7 for QUE; and 1.5 for OFC.
ConclusionsLHH can illustrate the trade-offs regarding potential benefits versus potential harms. Across a variety of measures, the lower-dose groups for both LUR and CAR generally evidenced a better benefit-risk profile than the higher-dose groups. While quetiapine and OFC demonstrated robust efficacy, their reduced tolerability resulted in a more marginal benefit-risk ratio for some of the outcomes.
FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Effect of Lurasidone on Manic Symptoms and Treatment-Emergent Mania in Adult and Pediatric Populations with Bipolar Depression
- Michael Tocco, Andrei Pikalov, Courtney Zeni, Robert Goldman
-
- Journal:
- CNS Spectrums / Volume 26 / Issue 2 / April 2021
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 May 2021, pp. 147-148
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Background
Lurasidone is approved for the treatment of bipolar depression both as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate (Li/VPA). The aim of these analyses was to evaluate the prevalence of treatment-emergent mania (TEM) and worsening of mania symptom severity in clinical trials of both adult and pediatric patients with bipolar depression treated with lurasidone.
MethodIn these post-hoc analyses, TEM and change in manic symptom severity as measured by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) were evaluated in two double-blind (DB), 6-week studies in adults of lurasidone monotherapy, 20–60 mg/d (n=161) and 80–120 mg/d (n=162) vs. placebo (n=162), and adjunctive therapy of lurasidone 20–120 mg/d + Li/VPA (n=179) vs. placebo + Li/VPA (n=161). Prevalence of TEM was also evaluated in a 6-month, open-label (OL) extension study of adults treated with lurasidone monotherapy (n=316) or adjunctive therapy (n=497). In pediatric patients (ages 10–17) TEM and change in manic symptoms was evaluated in a DB 6-week study of lurasidone monotherapy (n=173) vs. placebo (n=170) and in a 24-month OL extension study. TEM was defined as an adverse event of mania or hypomania and/or having a YMRS score =16 at 2 consecutive post-baseline weekly visits (or the final assessment) in short-term studies or 1 post-baseline monthly visit in long-term studies.
ResultsAdult studies: In short-term studies, TEM rates were comparable in patients treated with lurasidone monotherapy 20–60 mg/d (3.7%) and 80–120 mg/d (1.9%) vs. placebo (1.9%). TEM rates were also comparable in patients treated with lurasidone 20–120 mg/d (1.1%) adjunctive to Li/VPA vs. placebo + Li/VPA (1.2%). In the monotherapy study, significant reduction in YMRS score was observed at study endpoint for the 20–60 mg/d group compared to placebo (−1.9 vs. −1.3; p<0.05) with similar improvement relative to placebo in the 80–120 mg/d group. Change for YMRS score was comparable for lurasidone and placebo in the adjunctive study. In long-term studies, 1.3% of adult patients treated with lurasidone monotherapy (n=316) met criteria for mania, and 3.8% of patients on adjunctive lurasidone therapy (n=497) met TEM criteria. Pediatric studies: TEM rates were comparable in patients treated with lurasidone vs. placebo (1.7% vs. 2.3%). LS mean reduction in symptoms of mania from baseline to week 6 was significantly greater for lurasidone vs. placebo on YMRS score (−2.0 vs. −1.1; p<0.05). Pediatric long-term studies: After two years of OL treatment with lurasidone, 5.2% of patients met TEM criteria. Mean change in YMRS total score from DB baseline to Month 24 continued to improve (−2.0).
ConclusionsShort-term and long-term treatment with lurasidone demonstrated significant improvement in manic symptoms and was not associated with an increased risk of TEM in either adult or pediatric patient populations compared to rates reported in clinical populations of patients.
FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
146 Efficacy and Safety of the Asenapine Transdermal Patch, HP-3070, for Schizophrenia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Inpatient Study
- Leslie Citrome, David Walling, Courtney Zeni, Marina Komaroff, Alexandra Park
-
- Journal:
- CNS Spectrums / Volume 25 / Issue 2 / April 2020
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 24 April 2020, p. 293
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Background:
Asenapine is a 2nd-generation antipsychotic currently marketed as a sublingual (SL) tablet in the US for the treatment of schizophrenia. HP-3070, asenapine transdermal system, is a patch for treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Low- and high- HP-3070 doses deliver asenapine concentrations that are similar to SL asenapine 5 mg BID and 10 mg BID, respectively, but with fewer peak and trough fluctuations.
Methods:In this Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, 6-week inpatient study, adults with schizophrenia having baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score ≥80 and Clinical Global Impression–Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) score ≥4 were randomized 1:1:1 to HP 3070 high-dose, HP-3070 low-dose, or PBO.
The primary efficacy objective was Week 6 PANSS score change from baseline (CFB) vs PBO.
The key secondary objective was Week 6 CGI-S CFB vs PBO. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory results, vital signs, dermal safety, and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) assessments.
Results:A total of 616 patients were randomized, with 486 patients completing the study. Discontinuation rates were 23.3%, 18.6%, and 21.4% for HP-3070 high-dose, HP-3070 low-dose, and PBO, respectively; withdrawal of consent and AEs were the most common reasons for discontinuation. Demographics and baseline characteristics were well-balanced among treatment groups.
For PANSS total score, least squares mean (LSM) (standard error [SE]) estimates of the treatment comparison (HP-3070 vs PBO) for CFB at Week 6 were -4.8 (1.634; 95% CI: -8.06, -1.64; p=0.003) and -6.6 (1.630; 95% CI: 9.81, 3.40; p<0.001) for HP-3070 high- and low-dose, respectively. For CGI-S CFB at Week 6, LSM (SE) for the treatment comparison were 0.4 (0.100; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.16; p<0.001) for HP 3070 high-dose and 0.4 (0.099; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.25; p<0.001) for low-dose.
No deaths or serious TEAEs related to study treatment occurred. The HP-3070 safety profile was consistent with SL asenapine. Incidence of TEAEs at the patch application site was higher for HP-3070 (14.2% high-dose, 15.2% low-dose) than for PBO (4.4%); most of these events were mild or moderate in severity. PBO patients had higher rates of psychiatric disorders (24.3% vs 15.7% and 17.6% for HP-3070 high- and low-dose, respectively), with insomnia and anxiety as most common. Study treatment discontinuations due to application site reactions or skin disorders were low (≤0.5%) across treatment groups. There was no marked mean CFB for vital signs or electrocardiogram parameters, nor treatment differences observed on EPS assessments.
Conclusions:In this study, HP-3070 was efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated for treating schizophrenia in adults; both doses met primary and key secondary endpoints. As the first transdermal antipsychotic patch in the US, HP-3070 will provide patients a novel treatment option.
Funding Acknowledgements:Funded by Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co.