Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

46 results

Page 1 of 3

  • 9 - AI, Consumers and Tort Law

  • from Part III - Liability
  • Edited by Larry A. DiMatteo, University of Florida, Cristina Poncibó, Université de Turin, Geraint Howells, National University of Ireland, Galway
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of AI and Consumer Law
    Published online:
    21 October 2024
    Print publication:
    31 October 2024, pp 116-128

  • Summary

    The responsibilitiesand liability of the persons and organisations involved in the development of AI systems are not clearly identified. The assignment of liability will need government to mo e from a risk-based to a responsibility-based system. One possible approach would be to establish a pan-EU compensation fund for damages caused by digital technologies and AI, financed by the industry and insurance companies.

  • 28 - AI and the Law

  • from Part VII - Future of AI
  • Edited by Larry A. DiMatteo, University of Florida, Cristina Poncibò, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy, Michel Cannarsa
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence
    Published online:
    28 July 2022
    Print publication:
    11 August 2022, pp 419-428

  • Summary

    The hope is that legal rules relating to AI technologies can frame their progress and limit the risks of abuse. This hope is tentative as technology seriously challenges the theory and practice of the law across legal traditions. The use of interdisciplinary and comparative methodologies makes clear that AI is currently impacting our understanding of the law. AI can be understood as a regulatory technology and confirms that AI can produce normative effects some of which may be contrary to public laws and regulations.

The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence
  • Global Perspectives on Law and Ethics
  • Edited by Larry A. DiMatteo, Cristina Poncibò, Michel Cannarsa
  • Published online:
    28 July 2022
    Print publication:
    11 August 2022
  • The technology and application of artificial intelligence (AI) throughout society continues to grow at unprecedented rates, which raises numerous legal questions that to date have been largely unexamined. Although AI now plays a role in almost all areas of society, the need for a better understanding of its impact, from legal and ethical perspectives, is pressing, and regulatory proposals are urgently needed. This book responds to these needs, identifying the issues raised by AI and providing practical recommendations for regulatory, technical, and theoretical frameworks aimed at making AI compatible with existing legal rules, principles, and democratic values. An international roster of authors including professors of specialized areas of law, technologists, and practitioners bring their expertise to the interdisciplinary nature of AI.

  • 16 - Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI

  • from Part V - Legal Ethics and Societal Values Confront Technology
  • Edited by Larry A. DiMatteo, University of Florida, André Janssen, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Pietro Ortolani, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Francisco de Elizalde, Michel Cannarsa, Mateja Durovic, King's College London
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Lawyering in the Digital Age
    Published online:
    18 November 2021
    Print publication:
    25 November 2021, pp 283-297

  • Summary

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of many digital technologies currently under development.1 In recent years, it is having increasing repercussions in the field of law. These repercussions go beyond the traditional effect of an economic and industrial evolution. Indeed, the epochal industrial transformations and paradigmatic shifts it generates in many sectors have, from a legal perspective, a structural impact on legal rules and on legal practice. Moreover, the speed of these transformations also impacts on the regulatory response that a legislator is able to provide. In point of fact, rather than running the risk of new legislation rapidly becoming obsolete, regulators around the world have preferred so far to take their time to observe the changes unfolding in current technologies, and to assess their impacts from the legal point of view, before proposing any specific courses of action. Although legal experts, contrary to ethicists, have traditionally shown little interest in AI, algorithms, machine learning and so forth, it is now virtually impossible for them to ignore the impact of AI on the law, and more specifically, the question of whether actual legal rules and regulations can cope with the changes taking place in the economy and in the society, on one hand, and whether the use of AI tools in legal practice is compatible with the founding principles of our legal orders, on the other hand. If new rules are needed, lawyers will have to define their content and how to make sure they are suitable for the long term, in a context of rapidly changing technologies.

Page 1 of 3