Few data are available on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization in day care. We performed a study in a medical university child care center to study the epidemiology of MRSA in this population.

Survey.

A child care center on the campus of a university medical center.

One hundred four children who attended the child care center and 32 employees gave samples that were cultured for MRSA. Seventeen household members of the children and employee found to be colonized with MRSA also gave samples that were cultured. Parents and employees completed questionnaires about demographic characteristics, medical conditions and treatments, and possible exposure risks outside the child care center. In addition, 195 environmental samples were taken from sites at the childcare center. Isolates were analyzed for relatedness by use of molecular typing, and statistical analysis was performed.

The prevalence of MRSA in the children was 6.7%. One employee (3.1%) was colonized with MRSA. Cultures of samples given by 6 of 17 (35.3%) family members of these children and the employee yielded MRSA. MRSA was recovered from 4 of 195 environmental samples. Molecular typing revealed that many of the MRSA isolates were indistinguishable, and 18 of the 21 isolates were community-associated MRSA. Multivariable analysis revealed that receipt of macrolide antibiotics (P = .002; odds ratio, 39.6 [95% confidence interval, 3.4—651.4]) and receipt of asthma medications (P = .024; odds ratio, 26.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.5-500.7]) were related to MRSA colonization.

There was a low prevalence of MRSA colonization in children and employees in the child care center but a higher prevalence of colonization in their families. Molecular typing showed that transmission of MRSA likely occurred in the child care center. The use of macrolide antibiotics and asthma medications may increase the risk of MRSA colonization in this population.

To establish an efficient and sensitive technique for recovering vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from perianal and environmental samples collected during implementation of control measures for an outbreak of VRE.

Perianal and environmental samples were collected in triplicate on sterile swabs. One swab was used to inoculate a selective broth medium containing 6 μg of vancomycin and 8 μg of ciprofloxacin per mL, one to inoculate Campylobacter agar containing 10 μg/mL of vancomycin, and one to inoculate Enterococcosel agar containing 8 μg/mL of vancomycin.

Samples were collected in the intensive care units of a 600-bed university hospital over a period of 2 months.

Patients and their immediate environment were sampled if they resided in a ward with a patient known to be colonized or infected with VRE.

Of the 88 perianal samples obtained from 63 patients, 37 were positive for VRE by broth culture, with 36 also recovered on both types of solid media (sensitivity, 97.3%; negative predictive value, 98.1%). Of the initial samples collected from each of the 63 patients, 20 were positive for VRE by all methods. Of the 500 environmental samples cultured, 139 were positive for VRE in broth, with only 33 recovered on Campylobacter agar (sensitivity, 23.7%; negative predictive value, 77.2%) and 22 on Enterococcosel agar (sensitivity, 15.8%; negative predictive value, 75.2%).

Our data indicate that, when performing surveillance cultures during an outbreak of VRE, use of an enrichment broth medium is required to recover VRE contaminating environmental surfaces; however, direct inoculation to selective solid medium is adequate to recover VRE in patient perianal specimens.

To investigate and control an outbreak of colonization and infection caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in a burn intensive care unit (BICU).

Epidemiological investigation, including multiple point-prevalence culture surveys of patients and environment, cultures from hands of healthcare workers (HCWs), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing of patient and environmental isolates, case-control study, and institution and monitoring of control measures.

BICU in an 800-bed university medical center in Galveston, Texas.

Between June 6, 1996, and July 14, 1997, 21 patients were colonized by VRE, and 4 of these patients developed bacteremia. Of 2,844 environmental cultures, 338 (11.9%) were positive, but all hand cultures from HCWs were negative. PFGE typing indicated that the outbreak was clonal, with VRE isolates from patients differing by ≤4 bands from the index case. Thirteen of 14 environmental isolates varied by ≤4 bands from the pattern of the index case. A case-control study analyzed by exact logistic regression identified diarrhea (odds ratio [OR], 43.9; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 5.5-infinity; P=.0001) and administration of an antacid (OR, 24.2; CI95,2.9-infinity; P=.002) as independent risk factors for acquisition of VRE. During a 5-week period in October and November 1996, all patient and 317 environmental cultures were negative for VRE. The outbreak recurred from a contaminated electrocardiogram lead that had not been identified during the prior 5 weeks. VRE were finally eradicated from the BICU in July 1997, using barrier isolation and a very aggressive environmental decontamination program.

A VRE outbreak in a BICU over 13 months was caused by a single clone. After apparent eradication of VRE from a BICU, recrudescence of the outbreak occurred, evidently from a small inapparent source of environmental contamination. Changes in gastrointestinal (GI) tract function (motility) and administration of medications, other than antibiotics, that have an effect on the GI tract may increase the risk of GI tract colonization by VRE in burn patients. Application of barrier isolation and an aggressive environmental decontamination program can eradicate VRE from a burn population.

To determine the accuracy with which circulating nurses (CNs) classify surgical procedures by risk of contamination in the operating room.

Classification of surgical procedures by CNs was compared with the classification of surgical procedures by a physician observer.

University-affiliated, tertiary care hospital.

Circulating nurses used the traditional wound classification system of clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty-infected to classify surgical wounds in the operating room. A physician remained in the operating room throughout each of 100 surgical procedures and simultaneously classified surgical wounds without the knowledge of the CNs.

Classification of surgical wounds by CNs was compared with classification by the physician observer for 50 cases in general surgery and 50 cases in trauma surgery. Compared with the physician observer, the overall accuracy of classification by CNs was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] of 81.6% to 94.4%; Kappa statistic, 0.83). Classification of surgical wounds was more difficult in trauma surgery (accuracy of 82%) than in general surgery (accuracy of 94%). Accuracy increased for both services when surgical wounds were classified into just two categories (clean or clean-contaminated versus contaminated or dirty-infected).

Surgical wounds can be classified in the operating room with a high degree of accuracy by CNs. Classification was more difficult in trauma than in general surgery, but classification in trauma surgery improved with feedback to and additional education of CNs. The accuracy of classification by CNs was even higher when classifications were divided into just two categories.

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of standard infection control surveillance techniques for the identification of surgical wound infections.

Surveillance data collected by three infection control practitioners (ICPs) was compared to surveillance data collected simultaneously by a gold standard observer.

University-affiliated, tertiary care hospital.

Using standard infection control surveillance techniques (chart review and discussions with patients' nurses and physicians), ICPs collected surveillance data on patients on the General Surgery and Trauma Surgery Services on days 4 and 7 after surgery and then weekly for 30 days or until patients were discharged from the hospital. Simultaneously, a hospital epidemiologist collected surveillance data and examined each patient's wound daily.

Nine hundred twenty-five surgical patients including 537 trauma cases and 388 elective general surgery cases were followed postoperatively. The ICPs identified 67 surgical wound infections, and the hospital epidemiologist identified 80 surgical wound infections for a sensitivity of 83.8% with a 95% confidence interval (CI95) of 75.7% to 91.9%. Specificity was 99.8% with a CI95 of 99% to 100%. The sensitivity was the same for trauma surgery and general surgery, but incisional wound infections were more difficult to identify than deep wound infections. During a second validation period, sensitivity was 92.3% with a CI95 of 62% to 100%.

Standard infection control surveillance techniques have the same sensitivity for detection of surgical wound infections as they do for identification of other nosocomial infections. Accurate data on surgical wound infections can be collected without direct examination of surgical wounds.