We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The purpose of the paper by Begg and Portes is to discuss the problem of enterprise debt in the context of the transformation of the economies of Central and Eastern Europe, and to propose a sequencing of reforms designed to tackle it.
In these comments I will first consider the stylized facts documented in the paper, then I will propose a simple model of banking that captures some of the costs of increased bank lending to state-owned enterprises, to conclude with some comments on the policy proposals set out in the paper.
The facts
The paper starts with a section in which the problem is identified. I have two comments on this section. First, I do not find the evidence on the magnitude of the problem entirely convincing. In particular, Tables 8.1 and 8.3 do not show a very significant pattern of increased bank credit to state-owned enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe. Second, I think that the discussion of the causes and consequences of the explosion of inter-enterprise credit is much weaker than what would be required to support the line of argument in the paper. In this respect, I would have liked to see a serious effort to model the relationship between bank and interfirm credit. At any rate, I basically agree with the conclusion that ‘policy should address the financial health of banks and enterprises [and that] with that restored, inter-enterprise credit will take care of itself’.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.