We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Herbaceous perennials must annually rebuild the aboveground photosynthetic architecture from carbohydrates stored in crowns, rhizomes, and roots. Knowledge of carbohydrate utilization and storage can inform management decisions and improve control outcomes for invasive perennials. We monitored the nonstructural carbohydrates in a population of the hybrid Bohemian knotweed [Polygonum ×bohemicum (J. Chrtek & Chrtková) Zika & Jacobson [cuspidatum × sachalinense]; syn.: Fallopia ×bohemica (Chrtek and Chrtková) J.P. Bailey] and in Japanese knotweed [Polygonum cuspidatum Siebold & Zucc.; syn.: Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decr.]. Carbohydrate storage in crowns followed seasonal patterns typical of perennial herbaceous dicots corresponding to key phenological events. Starch was consistently the highest nonstructural carbohydrate present. Sucrose levels did not show a consistent inverse relationship with starch levels. Lateral distribution of starch in rhizomes and, more broadly, total nonstructural carbohydrates sampled before dormancy break showed higher levels in rhizomes compared with crowns. Total nonstructural carbohydrate levels in crowns reached seasonal lows at an estimated 22.6% of crown dry weight after accumulating 1,453.8 growing degree days (GDD) by the end of June, mainly due to depleted levels of stored starch, with the estimated minimum of 12.3% reached by 1,220.3 GDD accumulated by mid-June. Depletion corresponded to rapid development of vegetative canopy before entering the reproductive phase in August. Maximum starch accumulation in crowns followed complete senescence of aboveground tissues by mid- to late October. Removal of aboveground shoot biomass in late June to early July with removal of vegetation regrowth in early September before senescence would optimize the use of time and labor to deplete carbohydrate reserves. Additionally, foliar-applied systemic herbicide translocation to belowground tissue should be maximized with applications in late August through early fall to optimize downward translocation with assimilate movement to rebuild underground storage reserves. Fall applications should be made before loss of healthy leaf tissue, with the window for control typically ending by late September in Minnesota.
We present seismic measurements of the firn column at Korff Ice Rise, West Antarctica, including measurements of compressional-wave velocity and attenuation. We describe a modified spectral-ratio method of measuring the seismic quality factor (Q) based on analysis of diving waves, which, combined with a stochastic method of error propagation, enables us to characterise the attenuative structure of firn in greater detail than has previously been possible. Q increases from 56 ± 23 in the uppermost 12 m to 570 ± 450 between 55 and 77 m depth. We corroborate our method with consistent measurements obtained via primary reflection, multiple, source ghost, and critically refracted waves. Using the primary reflection and its ghost, we find Q = 53 ± 20 in the uppermost 20 m of firn. From the critical refraction, we find Q = 640 ± 400 at 90 m depth. Our method aids the understanding of the seismic structure of firn and benefits characterisation of deeper glaciological targets, providing an alternative means of correcting seismic reflection amplitudes in cases where conventional methods of Q correction may be impossible.
Community-Research Advisory Councils (C-RAC) provide a unique mechanism for building sustainable community-academic partnership, fostering bidirectional understanding of complex research issues, disseminating timely research findings, and thereby improving public trust in science. Created in 2009, the Johns Hopkins C-RAC has a mission to achieve diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) of stakeholders across the entire research continuum. It has nurtured over a decade of partnership among community and academic stakeholders toward addressing health disparity, health equity, structural racism, and discrimination. Evidence of successful strategies to ensure DEI in partnership and lessons learned are illustrated in this special communication.
Your author took to heart the editors’ exhortation to understand international humanitarian law (IHL) ‘in its broadest sense (including most notably the jus in bello, humanitarian law, human rights in armed conflict and weapons control)’. What follows, outlining chronologically a series of actions by Pacific peoples and governments, fits roughly into these fields, often straddling them. Driving all the initiatives are the twin threats of other peoples’ conflicts and nuclear radiation to present and future generations of island-dwellers.
Introduction/Innovation Concept: Student Run Simulation Team (SRST) is an extracurricular medical student group that provided peers with opportunities to learn and teach principles of acute care medicine in a simulated environment. Early exposure to simulation has been identified as a way for medical students to engage in self-directed education. SRST operated through a peer-led model. Senior medical students designed and delivered didactic sessions, simulation scenarios, and debriefed the scenarios to emphasise targeted objectives. Methods: Informal interviews conducted by the SRST as part of a needs analysis identified barriers to an effective transition from pre-clerkship to clerkship. Specifically, principles of team dynamics including effective communication and role clarification in emergency situations were identified as areas where students lacked confidence. The curriculum focused on leadership and an effective team approach to common acute presentations. SRST members acquired simulation skills under the guidance of a simulation team at the University of Calgary. In the inaugural year, 8 second year students developed and delivered the curriculum to 16 first year students. Quality improvement surveys and participant feedback contributed to ongoing program review and refinement. Curriculum, Tool, or Material: Didactic lectures and task-trainer based skills sessions were created to assist the medical students in developing a foundational approach to a patient presenting to the emergency department. Three distinct simulations of increasing complexity were designed for students to build on their skills. SRST members worked with simulation consultants during 4 custom designed training sessions to develop simulation skills (design and debriefing). The distinguishing aspect of SRST is an emphasis on the non-technical skills of teamwork, leadership, and communication, rather than knowledge acquisition alone. The structure also included a succession plan for continued peer-led education where the student participants will form the next year’s team and will receive similar simulation education. Conclusion: SRST is the first student-run simulation initiative to be established in a Canadian medical school. This near-peer team allowed for early practice of non-technical skills in emergency settings. SRST facilitated opportunities for simulation education for both the junior students as participants, and the senior medical students as educators. This is an ongoing initiative, with plans to continue program development in future years.
When the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court was being negotiated, there was much discussion about whether ‘treaty crimes’ should be included within the jurisdiction of the Court along with the ‘core crimes’ of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. Ultimately, only the ‘core crimes’ were included. In the context of that debate, ‘treaty crimes’ referred to serious drug crimes as contained in United Nations treaties on the subject, and the set of ‘terrorism’ offences contained in a number of multilateral treaties entered into from the 1970s onwards, beginning with hijacking and other offences against aircraft. The dozen or so terrorism treaties in question were negotiated under the auspices of the United Nations and its specialised agencies, notably the International Civil Aviation Organisation and the International Maritime Organisation. These terror crimes include assaults on internationally protected persons, the taking of hostages, unlawful dealings in nuclear materials, violence at airports serving international aviation, acts against the safety of maritime navigation and on fixed platforms on the continental shelf, attacks on United Nations and associated personnel, terrorist bombings, the financing of terrorism, and nuclear terrorism. Such crimes may yet find their way into the jurisdiction of the Court, since it was understood in Rome in 1998 that their inclusion would be considered ‘later’. The process for their possible inclusion is proceeding at a glacial pace and ‘later’ is nowhere near in sight.
I suggest in this chapter that the category of treaty crimes is in fact much broader than those that were on the table in Rome. It encompasses a multitude of infractions from the exotic to the mundane that have been regulated in bilateral and multilateral treaty practice over the last two hundred years. It is common these days to describe this area as ‘transnational criminal law’, as opposed to ‘international criminal law’ or ‘international criminal law stricto sensu’, the latter terms being commonly used to describe the Rome Statute crimes. The treaties that are the subject of this chapter are often labelled ‘suppression conventions’, a descriptor which emphasises their core feature. That core is a promise by the parties to make something criminal under their domestic law, to ‘suppress’ it.
The Murchison Widefield Array is a Square Kilometre Array Precursor. The telescope is located at the Murchison Radio–astronomy Observatory in Western Australia. The MWA consists of 4 096 dipoles arranged into 128 dual polarisation aperture arrays forming a connected element interferometer that cross-correlates signals from all 256 inputs. A hybrid approach to the correlation task is employed, with some processing stages being performed by bespoke hardware, based on Field Programmable Gate Arrays, and others by Graphics Processing Units housed in general purpose rack mounted servers. The correlation capability required is approximately 8 tera floating point operations per second. The MWA has commenced operations and the correlator is generating 8.3 TB day−1 of correlation products, that are subsequently transferred 700 km from the MRO to Perth (WA) in real-time for storage and offline processing. In this paper, we outline the correlator design, signal path, and processing elements and present the data format for the internal and external interfaces.
The formal commissioning of the IRWG occurred at the 1991 Buenos Aires General Assembly, following a Joint Commission meeting at the IAU GA in Baltimore in 1988 that identified the problems with ground-based infrared photometry. The meeting justification, papers, and conclusions, can be found in Milone (1989). In summary, the challenges involved how to explain the failure to achieve the milli-magnitude precision expected of infrared photometry and an apparent 3% limit on system transformability. The proposed solution was to redefine the broadband Johnson system, the passbands of which had proven so unsatisfactory that over time effectively different systems proliferated, although bearing the same “JHKLMNQ” designations; the new system needed to be better positioned and centered in the spectral windows of the Earth's atmosphere, and the variable water vapour content of the atmosphere needed to be measured in real time to better correct for atmospheric extinction.
The Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression, whose work was aimed at completing the definition of aggression for the purposes of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, discussed complementarity only briefly. That discussion suggests, correctly in the author's opinion, that the complementarity doctrine applies to this crime essentially as it does in respect of the other crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (‘ICC’). Aggression, however, raises acutely an issue that was glossed over in the Rome negotiations and in most of the secondary literature: does ‘a State which has jurisdiction’, as referred to in Article 17 of the Statute, include a state which asserts competence on the basis of a universal jurisdiction theory? In short, can a court, sitting neither in the aggressor state nor the victim state assert ‘able and willing’ jurisdiction such as to trump the jurisdiction of the ICC. This chapter discusses these issues and raises the question whether, under international customary law, there is jurisdiction over the crime of aggression in third-party states based on a universal jurisdiction theory. Beyond that, it seems clear that complementarity applies to prosecutions in either a victim state (which has territoriality or effects jurisdiction), or an aggressor state (where there is territoriality or nationality jurisdiction).
Introduction
Article 5 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court states that ‘the crime of aggression’ is one of the four crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court. It adds that the Court shall only exercise its jurisdiction over the crime ‘once a provision is adopted in accordance with articles 121 and 123 defining the crime and setting out the conditions under which the Court shall exercise jurisdiction with respect to this crime’. Devising an appropriate ‘provision’ (or provisions) was the function of the Court's Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression (‘SWGCA’). The Special Working Group completed its work in February 2009. Its proposals for enabling the Court to exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression were the main item on the agenda at the 2010 Review Conference on the Court's Statute, held in Kampala, Uganda. The Review Conference duly adopted amendments designed to activate the Court's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression, based on the SWGA's draft, but with significant developments to the parts of the draft concerned with the ‘conditions’ for exercise of jurisdiction.
The modern usage of the words “crimes against humanity” dates from the Nuremberg Charter, article 6(c) of which reads as follows:
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.
I doubt very much that the drafters of the Nuremberg Charter who gathered in London from June 26 to August 8, 1945 saw themselves as engaged in a codification exercise. In retrospect, the characterization is perhaps not inappropriate, although the term “crimes against humanity,” which provided a catchy title in the Charter to go along with “crime against peace” and “war crimes,” did not make an appearance in the drafting until the very last moment. Until then, the talk had been of “atrocities,” “persecutions,” and sometimes “deportations” (it apparently being understood that these were for the purpose of slave labor).
Probably the closest example of usage hinting at what would be “codified” in London was in the declaration of May 28, 1915 by the Governments of France, Great Britain, and Russia concerning the massacres of the Armenian population in Turkey, killings to which the term “genocide” has also since been applied.