19 results
93132 Relationship between Level of Response to Alcohol and Body Weight Status in Individuals across the Spectrum of Alcohol Use and Misuse
- Rhianna R. Vergeer, Bethany L. Stangl, Melanie L. Schwandt, Nancy Diazgranados, Vijay A. Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 5 / Issue s1 / March 2021
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 30 March 2021, p. 137
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
ABSTRACT IMPACT: Improved understanding of the relationship between level of response to alcohol and body weight in the context of other contributing factors will help inform prevention and intervention efforts regarding obesity. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We evaluated the association between level of response to alcohol and weight status across the spectrum of alcohol misuse. We hypothesized that lower level of response to alcohol would be associated with heavier weight, after controlling for obesity risk factors like food addiction, impulsivity, and low socioeconomic status. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Adult participants (N=587) enrolled in NIAAA’s natural history study completed Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol (SRE), a retrospective measure of level of response to alcohol, along with Lifetime Drinking History (LDH); Yale Food Addiction (FA) Scale; Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS); Delayed Discounting Task (DDT). Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM disorders were conducted to identify individuals with current alcohol use disorder (AUD). Body mass index (BMI), computed from height and weight measured during the study, and used to stratify participants into 3 groups: normal weight (N=222), overweight (N=219), or obese (N=146). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: SRE scores during heaviest drinking period were lowest in the heavier weight group, after accounting for FA, impulsivity, alcohol-related, and demographic variables (ê•2=238.5, p=0.002, Cox and Snell Pseudo R2=0.43). Compared to the obese group, normal weight and overweight groups had fewer FA symptoms and higher BIS cognitive complexity (p values<0.01) but similar rates of current AUD. Relative to the obese group, the normal weight group was more likely to be White, and to have lower household incomes but more education, more years of heavy drinking (LDH), and steeper delayed discounting, p values ≤0.03. The overweight group had a higher proportion of males than did the obese group, p<0.001. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Lower level of response during heaviest drinking period was significantly associated with current weight status, suggesting a relationship between alcohol sensitivity and BMI. Future work will explore pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic and additional risk factors underlying this relationship.
36344 Effect of CHRNA5 genetic variation and smoking on alcohol related phenotypes in healthy adult drinkers
- Shyamala K. Venkatesh, Bethany L. Stangl, Natalia A. Quijano Cardé, Mariella De Biasi, Vijay A. Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 5 / Issue s1 / March 2021
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 30 March 2021, pp. 2-3
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
ABSTRACT IMPACT: Understanding the influence of genetic variation and smoking on alcohol consumption helps in improving the treatment strategies for alcohol addiction OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Variation in the nicotinic receptor gene CHRNA5 (rs16969968) is associated with nicotine use and dependence, however its role in alcohol consumption is unclear. This study examined the effects of rs16969968 and smoking on alcohol related phenotypes in people without alcohol use disorder (AUD). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The study included 1,037 healthy adult drinkers without AUD (201 smokers, 836 non-smokers). A subset (n=161) participated in an Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration (IV-ASA) laboratory session. Alcohol-related measures included Timeline Followback (TLFB), which measures drinking quantity and frequency in the past 90 days, and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), which measures alcohol use and consequences. IV-ASA measures included average and peak breath alcohol concentration (BrAC). The effect of rs16969968 was tested using a dominant model based on the presence of the A allele, and the influence of the rs16969968 polymorphism and smoking on alcohol phenotypes was assessed using t-tests and two-way ANOVA. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There was a main effect of rs16969968 genotype with A-allele carriers (AA/AG) showing higher AUDIT-Dependence scores compared to the GG group. A main effect of smoking was observed on all the TLFB and AUDIT measures, with smokers showing greater alcohol consumption and problems compared to non-smokers. In the rs16969968 AA/AG group, smokers reported significantly more drinking days (p<0.0001), and greater number of drinks (p<0.0001), as well as higher AUDIT scores than non-smokers. IV-ASA measures did not show any difference between genotype groups or between smokers and non-smokers. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: This study identifies both independent and interactive effects of CHRNA5 gene variation and smoking on alcohol drinking measures and provides strong evidence for the effect of smoking on alcohol drinking and its consequences.
4491 Cumulative Childhood Trauma Load Across Race in Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorder
- Nia Byrd, Bethany L. Stangl, Melanie L. Schwandt, Nancy Diazgranados, Vijay A. Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 4 / Issue s1 / June 2020
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 29 July 2020, pp. 26-27
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our objective was to investigate racial differences in experiencing multiple categories of childhood trauma (CT) and the differential impact on alcohol use in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). We hypothesized that there would be a differential additive effect of CT categories endorsed and drinking behaviors between racial groups. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Participants were recruited through the NIAAA screening protocol where they completed alcohol-related assessments including a 90-day Timeline Followback (TLFB) and the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM disorders were conducted to identify participants with lifetime alcohol dependence (DSM-IV) or AUD (DSM-5) (N = 1152). Participants self-identified as Black or White completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) which assesses 5 types of CT: emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, physical neglect, and emotional neglect, and were classified into 3 CT groups: no trauma, 1 type of trauma, and 2+ types of trauma endorsed. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: For Black participants (N = 583), 21.6% experienced no trauma, 21% experienced 1 type, and 57.4% experienced 2 or more types, with the most common being physical abuse and emotional neglect. For White participants (N = 569), 32.1% experienced no trauma, 20.6% experienced 1 type, and 47.3% experienced 2 or more types, with the most common being emotional neglect and emotional abuse. There were significant associations between CT groups, TLFB, and AUDIT measures. For Black participants, AUDIT-Harm and AUDIT Total were significantly different across the 3 CT groups (all p values <0.05). For White participants, Heavy Drinking Days was significantly different across the 3 CT groups (p = 0.028), with trends for AUDIT-Harm (p = 0.061) and AUDIT-Dependence (p<0.065). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: In individuals with AUD, there were significant positive associations between the number of CT categories endorsed and alcohol use across race, suggesting a cumulative effect of CT on risky alcohol use. Future work includes exploring personality and behavioral mediators of the relationship between cumulative trauma load and drinking.
4288 Identifying Predictive Variables of High-Intensity Binge Drinking Through the Use of a Machine Learning Algorithm
- James Keoni Morris, Josh L. Gowin, Melanie L. Schwandt, Nancy Diazgranados, Vijay A. Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 4 / Issue s1 / June 2020
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 29 July 2020, p. 135
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To test if a machine learning algorithm could predict a person’s capacity to binge drink and explore what measures might be important for identifying individuals at risk for high-intensity binge drinking behaviors. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The sample included 1177 (474 female) non-treatment-seeking drinkers (age: 18-91 years), that were assigned to a group based on their heaviest drinking day reported in a 90-Day Alcohol Timeline Followback questionnaire. The groups were Non-Bingers (female: 12 drinks, male:>15 drinks). The sample was divided into a training sample (N = 884) and a testing sample (N = 293). A machine learning algorithm called random forest was then used to generate a predictive model based on measures of substance use, personality traits, and trauma. The model was applied to the testing sample to determine accuracy. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The first model correctly assigned 190 out of 293 subjects, giving it a total error rate of 0.35, with lowest rates for non-binge (0.19) and high-intensity (0.18), while medium-intensity had the highest error rate (0.86). The most important variables for the accuracy of the model included: total score on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, first five sub-score of the Self-Reported Effects of Alcohol, Compulsive Drinking subscale, and presence of a current psychiatric diagnosis. As a follow-up analysis, we built and tested another random forest model without the use of drinking dependence measures. This model had a total error rate of 0.39, and introduced other important variables such as smoking behaviors, perceived stress, IQ, and number of negative life events. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our study showed that it was possible for a machine learning algorithm to predict binge drinking intensity better than chance. Drinking patterns were the most robust predictors, and stress, IQ, and psychiatric diagnoses were also useful in predicting binge drinking intensity.
4191 The Role of Suggestibility and Trait Anxiety in Young Adult Alcohol Use
- Alexandra Cowand, Melanie Schwandt, Alyssa Schneider, Jodi M. Gilman, Nancy Diazgranados, Vijay A. Ramchandani, Bethany L. Stangl
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 4 / Issue s1 / June 2020
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 29 July 2020, p. 149
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The purpose of this study was to investigate how suggestibility and social susceptibility relate to alcohol use in young adult non-dependent alcohol users, and the role of trait anxiety in this relationship. We hypothesized that greater trait anxiety would be associated with higher levels of alcohol misuse, and this would be mediated by suggestibility. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Study participants enrolled in the NIAAA screening and assessment protocol completed questionnaires on suggestibility, anxiety, and alcohol use. The Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS) is a 95-question self-report assessment of suggestibility. Trait anxiety is assessed with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait (STAI-T). Alcohol measures included the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV or DSM-5 disorders were conducted, and non-dependent participants (N = 113) were considered. A median split was conducted (median age = 35.1 years), with the focus of this study on the younger individuals (N = 55). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Initial analyses showed that suggestibility, alcohol misuse, and trait anxiety all had significant positive correlations with one another. To better understand the relationship of peer influence, specifically, with drinking and anxiety, MISS subscale of Peer Conformity was analyzed. MISS total score and Peer Conformity were positively correlated with AUDIT Total as well as STAI-T Score. STAI-T Score was additionally positively correlated with AUDIT Total (all p2 = 0.222). We also looked at Peer Conformity in place of MISS Total (R2 = 0.213). In both models, only suggestibility measures were significant predictors of harmful alcohol use (p<0.01). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: In young social drinkers, there were significant positive associations between suggestibility, risky alcohol use, and trait anxiety. These results suggest that suggestibility may be a modifiable risk factor for risky alcohol consumption. Future directions include using mediation models to explore the associations between suggestibility, anxiety, and alcohol misuse.
4293 Relationship between recent drinking history, subjective response to alcohol, and sex in HRV in non-dependent drinkers
- Sachin Sundar, Bethany L. Stangl, Reza Momenan, Vijay A. Ramchandani, Kristin Corey, Khem Plata
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 4 / Issue s1 / June 2020
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 29 July 2020, pp. 35-36
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Previous research has shown acute and chronic alcohol effects on cardiac function, including elevated heart rate (HR) and lowered heart rate variability (HRV). This study aimed to examine the relationship between cardiac reactivity and subjective response following intravenous (IV) alcohol in non-dependent drinkers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Non-dependent drinkers (N = 46, average age = 25.2) completed a human laboratory IV alcohol self-administration (IV-ASA) session. Subjective response to alcohol was assessed using the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) and Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ). Drinking behavior was assessed using the Alcohol Timeline Followback (TLFB) and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). HR was recorded using the Polar Pro Heart Rate monitor throughout the session. HRV measures were calculated using guidelines determined by the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and The North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Recent drinking history as measured by the AUDIT and TLFB was not significantly different by sex. Results showed heavier drinking measures (AUDIT and TLFB) were positively associated with HRV measures (all p-values < 0.02). Those who reported a greater increase in alcohol craving (AUQ score) and wanted more alcohol (DEQ) following an alcohol prime, showed a greater change in HRV (p < 0.005). When examining HRV change from baseline throughout the priming session, there was a significant sex interaction for NN50 (p < 0.03) and a trend for PNN50 (p-value < 0.07). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Acute IV alcohol alters cardiac reactivity measures in non-dependent drinkers. Future directions include examining the role of sex in HRV changes during alcohol consumption during IV-ASA. Understanding the effect of alcohol on cardiac reactivity and physiology may help characterize those at risk for alcohol use disorders.
3294 HIGH INTENSITY BINGE DRINKING AND STIMULATING EFFECTS IN HUMAN LABORATORY STUDIES OF ALCOHOL SELF-ADMINISTRATION
- Julia Swan, Joshua L.Gowin, Bethany L. Stangl, Vijay A. Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 3 / Issue s1 / March 2019
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 March 2019, pp. 145-146
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) has previously been studied using Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview measures and administration of alcohol within laboratory sessions. However, most of those studies supplied alcohol orally and analyzed drinking across a range of drinking intensity and frequency measures. High intensity binge drinking, i.e., drinking alcohol at multiple levels of the binge threshold (5+ drinks for males, 4+ drinks for females) has been identified as a significant risk factor for developing AUD. In the present study, we examined the relationship between high intensity binge drinking with the behavioral and subjective response to intravenous alcohol in a lab study. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Two hundred participants completed a 90-Day TLFB interview, wherein the maximum number of drinks in a day established the participant’s binge level status as a Non-Binger (N = 37), Binge Level 1 (N = 96), Binge Level 2 (N = 44), or Binge Level 3 (N = 22). Binge Level 1 corresponds with at least one binge (4-7 drinks for women, 5-9 drinks for men); Binge Level 2 requires at least twice the binge level (8-11 drinks for women, 10-14 drinks for men); and Level 3 necessitates a participant to drink at least three times the binge level (12+ drinks for women, 15+ drinks for men) on one day. Non-Bingers had no binge level drinking in the 90-day interview. Participants also underwent a 150-minute intravenous-alcohol self-infusion, where participants would press a button to receive an infusion of an ethanol solution. During this, participants also completed subjective questionnaires including the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ), Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES), and Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ). Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests were used to examine the effect of group on alcohol infusion and subjective response measures. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A chi-square test for association showed significant statistical differences by groups in reaching binge level status (0.08% breath alcohol content) during the alcohol infusion session in the lab, X2 (3) = 23.321, p < 0.001. However, mean difference was not significantly different between Binge Level 2 and Binge Level 3 (0 < 1 < 2 = 3). Binge level groups showed significant differences in the number of button presses during the lab session (H(3) = 36.955, p < 0.001), peak breath alcohol concentration in the lab session (H(3) = 19.870, p < 0.001), and total binges in the TLFB (H(3) = 90.296, p < 0.001). Increased self-administration measures were proportional to the binge intensity level across groups, with no differences between Binge Level 2 and Binge Level 3 (0 < 1 < 2 = 3). For subjective measures, a Kruskal-Wallis H median test showed statistically significant differences between groups in the AUQ score following the priming infusion, H(3) = 11.489, p = 0.009, with bingers at all levels reporting higher scores compared to non-bingers (0 < 1 = 2 = 3). There was also a statistically significant difference between groups in the BAES Stimulation score following the priming infusion, H(3) = 9.023, p = 0.029, with differences seen between non-bingers and level 2 and level 3 bingers (0 = 1 < 2 = 3). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This study demonstrated that high intensity binge drinkers were more likely to reach binge level and overall greater alcohol consumption during a human lab alcohol administration study. Binge intensity level was also associated with higher stimulation and urge for alcohol following priming exposures, which may in turn drive the consumption of greater amounts of alcohol, which we know to be associated with greater risk for AUD.
3255 Association between dopaminergic genetic variants, COMTrs4680 and DRD2rs1076560, and alcohol consumption and reward behaviors in non-dependent drinkers
- Nancy Elizabeth Ortega, Bethany L. Stangl, Soundarya Soundararajan, Shaliciana Burrell, Hui Sun, Melanie L. Schwandt, Vijay A. Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 3 / Issue s1 / March 2019
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 March 2019, pp. 138-139
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The objective of this exploratory study is to evaluate the relationship between the individual genetic variants in COMTrs4680 and DRDrs1076560 and relevant alcohol use behaviors (i.e. alcohol consumption and reward processing behaviors) in non-dependent drinkers within experimentally controlled IV-ASA CAIS sessions. The overall goal of this study is to begin gathering data on the influence of individual genetic variants on alcohol consumption and other drinking-related behaviors. This will aid in the creation of a polygenic model of risk for AUD which will provide more insight into how the mesolimbic pathway is affected by alcohol use. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Study population: The sample included male and female non-dependent drinkers (N=149). Genotypes for functional polymorphisms in COMT (rs4680) and DRD2 (rs1076560) genes were determined for all subjects from blood samples obtained during screening. Alcohol consumption was assessed using the 90-day Timeline Followback Interviews (TLFB). Study population demographics: Self-reported gender (53.5% identified as male); Self-reported race (61.2% identified as white); Age ranged from 21-46 years old, with 22 years being the mode. Experiment: Free access (open-bar) intravenous alcohol self-administration (IV-ASA) using the computer-assisted alcohol infusion system (CAIS) paradigm; Subjects had the choice of pressing a button ad libitum for IV alcohol infusions during the session, neurobehavioral questionnaires were collected throughout the 2.5-hr alcohol infusion session. Primary outcome measures included: Total Rewards, Peak breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) achieved, and Total Ethanol consumed. Statistical Analyses: Conducted using SPSS IBM Statistics Versions 1.0.0-2482; non-dependent drinkers were organized into two groups based on their genotypes, minor allele carriers and major allele homozygotes. Outcome measures were compared between genotype groups using analysis of variance or non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: -We expect the genetic makeup of the sample to be reflective of larger genome samples that are publically available (e.g. e!Ensembl) - Initial analysis for COMTrs4680 did not reveal significant effects on IV-ASA measures. Specifically, the majo DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) affects millions of men and women globally. The heterogeneity within AUD individuals has made it difficult to identify biological and/or psychological factors that could be targeted for the development of treatments. By using the human laboratory model of free access IV-ASA, this study evaluated the relationship between dopaminergic genetic variants, COMTrs4680 and DRDrs1076560, and alcohol consumption in non-dependent drinkers within a controlled experimental environment. This study will begin to evaluate genetic and behavioral data that can be used to create a polygenic model of risk for AUD, which will provide more insight as to how the mesolimbic reward pathway is affected by alcohol use and contributes to risk for AUD.
3207 Relation between Dopamine Transporter (DAT1) polymorphism and subjective effects of alcohol among non-dependent drinkers
- Soundarya Soundararajan, Bethany L. Stangl, Courtney L. Vaughan, Hui Sun, Falk Lohoff, Melanie L. Schwandt, Vijay Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 3 / Issue s1 / March 2019
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 March 2019, p. 154
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene variation is associated with reward-related phenotypes including alcohol response. There is also evidence for a potential moderating role for mu-opioid receptor (OPRM1) gene variation on the relationship between DAT1 variation and alcohol response measures. We aimed at studying the interaction between the DAT1 VNTR and OPRM1 A118G polymorphisms on alcohol consumption and subjective responses among non-dependent drinkers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We employed a progressive ratio (PR) paradigm of intravenous alcohol self-administration (IV-ASA) using the Computer-Assisted Infusion System (CAIS) to assess the motivation for alcohol seeking and consumption in a sample of nondependent drinkers. We used the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) and Biphasic Alcohol Effects Questionnaire (BAES) to assess subjective response. IV-ASA measures included average breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) and total ethanol infused. Peripheral blood samples were collected for genotyping. Ethics approval was obtained from the NIH Addictions Institutional Review Board. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Fifty participants completed the PR IV-ASA session after informed consent. There were significant interactions between the DAT1 and OPRM1 genotypes in subjective effects of alcohol. Simple main effects analysis showed that DAT1 10a allele carriers that were also OPRM1 G allele carriers had significantly higher scores for several measures: “feel the drug effects” (F (1,46)=6.573, P = 0.014), “feel intoxicated”(F(1,46)=8.613, P = 0.005) and “feeling high” (F(1,46)=10.889, P = 0.002) in DEQ and higher sedation (F(1,46)=4.575, P = 0.038) in BAES. The genotypes statistically significantly predicted average breath alcohol (F (1,61) =3.295, p=0.044) and total ethanol infused(F(1,61)=3.632, p=0.032. DAT1 VNTR and OPRM1 A118G polymorphisms taken together accounted for 6.9 and 7.8% of variations in average breath alcohol and total ethanol infused respectively. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Polymorphic variations in DAT1 and OPRM1 interact with each other in determining subjective effects of alcohol in intravenous alcohol infusion assessing motivation for alcohol seeking and consumption in nondependent drinkers. These epistatic interactions in subjective effects of alcohol are salient in the context of predicting and understanding neurobiological effects of alcohol and thereby the therapeutic responses in treating alcohol use disorders.
3376 Super Bingers: Traits and Patterns Associated with High-Intensity Drinking
- James Keoni Morris, Julia E. Swan, Josh L. Gowin, Melanie L. Schwandt, Nancy Diazgranados, Vijay A. Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 3 / Issue s1 / March 2019
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 March 2019, pp. 154-155
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study attempts to evaluate the drinking patterns and traits of individuals who partake in high intensity drinking, defined as binge drinking at 2 or more times the minimum binge count (4 drinks for females, 5 drinks for males). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We analyzed data from non-treatment seeking volunteers enrolled in NIAAA screening protocols. The sample included 706 males and 474 females ranging in age from 18 to 91. Subjects were assigned to one of four groups (Non-Binge, Level 1, Level 2, Level 3) based on the highest binge session reported in their Timeline Followback questionnaire. The criteria for each group were different for males and females based on the current NIAAA definitions of binge drinking. The cutoffs for females were 0-3 drinks for Non-Binge, 4-7 drinks for Level 1, 8-11 drinks for Level 2, and 12+ drinks for Level 3. The male drink cutoffs were 0-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15+ respectively. We looked at various drinking measures (Timeline Followback, Self-Reported Effects of Alcohol (SRE), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)) and trait measures (UPPS-P Impulsivity Scale, Barratt’s Impulsiveness Scale, Buss Perry Aggression Questionnaire) to identify mean differences between groups. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There were significant differences in drinking patterns between the groups for both males and females. Number of drinking days, average drinks per drinking day, and number of heavy drinking days all increased as binge level increased. There were also significant differences between groups in males for trait measures. Level 2 and Level 3 bingers scored significantly higher on impulsivity and aggression than the Level 1 and Non-Binge groups. Ongoing analyses are examining differences among binge groups on other measures including SRE and AUDIT. Future analyses will explore potential mechanisms underlying the relationships between trait measures and binge drinking using structural equation modeling. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This study found significant differences between high-intensity drinkers, or “super bingers”, and lighter binge and non-binge drinkers. Super bingers showed an overall heavier drinking pattern across measures. The elevated aggression, impulsivity, and overall heavy drinking patterns of super bingers suggest a behavioral profile that makes this group in particular at higher risk for developing alcohol use disorder and related problems. These traits and behaviors may also help identify targets for treatment interventions for alcohol use disorder.
3465 EXAMINING THE EFFECTS OF CHILDHOOD TRAUMA ON ADULT ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION: DOES RACE AND/OR SEX MATTER?
- Nia Byrd, Bethany Stangl, Melanie Schwandt, Mehdi Farokhnia, Lorenzo Leggio, Vijay Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 3 / Issue s1 / March 2019
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 March 2019, p. 44
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: There has been substantial research showing that there are race and sex differences on alcohol use. Similarly, race and sex disparities are also seen in a variety of different factors that impact drinking behaviors and other health outcomes. One of these factors of interest is Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) which is associated with an increased risk for excessive alcohol use and the harmful effects of drinking. Several studies have shown that racial minorities and females have a greater risk of ACEs, which may be partly related to various structural factors (i.e. poverty) and social norms. Although there has been a substantial amount of research done on ACEs, very few studies have looked at how their interaction with race and sex can influence alcohol-related behaviors. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 1,509 participants who self-identified as either Black or White were recruited through a screening protocol at the NIAAA where they completed a series of questionnaires. We categorized the participants into two groups based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders: Alcohol Dependent individuals (N=921) with either a past and/or current diagnosis and Non-dependent individuals (N=588). ACEs exposure was assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). We looked at both total score and the 5 subscales: emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, physical neglect, and emotional neglect. Drinking behaviors were assessed using a 90-day Timeline Followback interview and the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). The non-dependent sample was 63% White and 55% male while the alcohol dependent sample was 47% White and 70% male. We tested the interaction effects using ANOVA. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In the ND sample, there were significant race*sex*ACEs effects for average drinks per day with CTQ total score (P = 0.007), physical abuse (P = 0.005), and physical neglect (P = 0.003). There was also a 3-way interaction with physical neglect on heavy drinking days (P = 0.039) and a 2-way race*ACEs interaction on AUDIT total with physical abuse (P = 0.048). In the AD sample, there were significant 2-way race*ACEs interactions for three drinking outcomes: heavy drinking days with physical neglect (P = 0.009), AUDIT-Harmful Use subscore with CTQ total score (P = 0.028) and physical neglect (P = 0.001), AUDIT-Total score with CTQ total score (P = 0.007), physical abuse (P = 0.042), sexual abuse (P = 0.024), and physical neglect (P = 0.003). There were also 3-way interactions for AUDIT-Harmful use (P = 0.013) and AUDIT-Total scores (P = 0.011) with emotional abuse. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our results indicate that there are both 2-way (race*ACEs) and 3-way (race*sex*ACEs) interaction effects on alcohol consumption and the related negative effects for both non-dependent and dependent samples. There were no sex*ACEs interaction effects in either sample implying that race may play a bigger role in differentiating drinking outcomes by ACEs across males and females. However, contrary to our expectations, race seemed to be protective factor for Black participants against both alcohol consumption and the negative effects despite having higher rates of ACEs exposure. Future analyses will explore personality measures as potential mediators of the relationship between ACEs and alcohol use. Also, analyses will look to see if there are any behavioral factors that may contribute to resiliency among minority populations.
3289 The Role of Suggestibility in Alcohol Use and Misuse
- Alexandra Cowand, Bethany L. Stangl, Melanie L. Schwandt, Alyssa Schneider, Jodi M. Gilman, Nancy Diazgranados, Vijay A. Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 3 / Issue s1 / March 2019
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 March 2019, p. 156
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Suggestibility, defined as the inclination to accept and internalize messages, has not been assessed much in relation to alcohol use. Prior research has shown that suggestibility to social cues and peer influence may play a role in driving alcohol consumption. Our previous work has shown associations between suggestibility and alcohol consumption in social drinkers. This study aims to examine how suggestibility and social susceptibility are related to ideas alcohol consumption and consequences across the spectrum of alcohol use and misuse. We hypothesize that those with higher suggestibility and social susceptibility reports will also have higher alcohol consumption and consequences, and that the impact of susceptibility is lower in dependent compared to non-dependent drinkers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Study participants enrolled in the NIAAA screening and assessment protocol (N=157) completed questionnaires on suggestibility and alcohol consumption, The Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS) is a 95-question self-report assessment of suggestibility which draws from subcategories of consumer suggestibility, perceivability, physiological suggestibility, physiological reactivity, and peer conformity. Alcohol measures included 90-day Timeline Followback interviews and the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Participants also underwent the Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV or DSM-5 disorders, and were stratified into two groups: alcohol dependent (N = 86) and non-dependent (N=71). Median split by age was additionally used to explore age’s relationship with suggestibility and alcohol with the under 36 (N = 45) and over 36 (N = 26) non-dependent groups. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Initial analyses showed marked differences between the dependent and non-dependent groups in the relationship between the MISS total score and AUDIT total score. The non-dependent group showed significant positive correlations between MISS and AUDIT scores (r = 0.460, p < 0.001), while the dependent group did not show any correlation between MISS and AUDIT scores. Further examination of these relationships in the nondependent group revealed that MISS scores were also significantly positively correlated with AUDIT subscores of consumption, harm, and dependence. Age was found to have a significant negative correlation with MISS score (r = −0.354, p < 0.01). To better understand the role of age, the sample was split based on the median age (36 yrs), and analyzed separately. Results indicated robust relationships between MISS score and AUDIT (r = 0.457, p < 0.01) in the younger age group. In addition, the younger age group also showed significant relationships between MISS score and 90-day TLFB measures of total drinks, days drinking, and heavy drinking days. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: In non-dependent individuals, there was a significant positive relationship between suggestibility and alcohol measures, and these effects were amplified in younger individuals. No relationship was found between suggestibility and alcohol measures in the alcohol dependent individuals. This may be related to a greater impact of social and external contextual cues in younger social drinkers compared to dependent drinkers where tolerance and craving may have greater impact on alcohol consumption. These findings have important implications for traits that may put individuals at risk for developing harmful patterns of alcohol use and misuse. Future analyses will aim to examine biobehavioral underpinnings of the relationship between suggestibility and alcohol consumption.
2138 Susceptibility to social influence is associated with alcohol self-administration and subjective alcohol effects
- Alyssa Schneider, Bethany Stangl, Elgin R. Yalin, Jodi M. Gilman, Vijay Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 2 / Issue S1 / June 2018
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 November 2018, pp. 47-48
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Peer groups are one of the strongest determinants of alcohol use and misuse. Furthermore, social influence plays a significant role in alcohol use across the lifespan. One of the factors that most consistently predicts successful treatment outcomes for alcohol use disorders is one’s ability to change their social network. However, the concept of social influence as defined by suggestibility or susceptibility to social influence has not yet been studied as it relates to drinking behavior and acute subjective response to alcohol. Our objective was to examine the relationship between suggestibility and alcohol consumption and responses, using an intravenous alcohol self-administration (IV-ASA) paradigm in social drinkers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Healthy, social drinkers (n=20) completed a human laboratory session in which they underwent the IV-ASA paradigm. This consisted of an initial 25-minute priming phase, where participants were prompted to push a button to receive individually standardized IV alcohol infusions, followed by a 125-minute phase during which they could push the button for additional infusions. IV-ASA measures included the peak and average breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) and number of button presses. Subjective responses were assessed using the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) and Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) collected serially during the session. Participants completed the Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS) to assess suggestibility. The Alcohol Effects Questionnaire (AEFQ) was used to assess alcohol expectancies and the Timeline Followback questionnaire measured recent drinking history. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: After controlling for drinking history, greater suggestibility significantly predicted greater average BrAC, greater peak BrAC, and a greater number of button presses (p=0.03, p=0.02, p=0.04, respectively) during the early open bar phase. Suggestibility significantly predicted subjective alcohol effects following the priming phase which included “Feel,” “Want,” “High,” and “Intoxicated” and was trending for “Like” (p=0.02, p=0.03, p=0.01, p=0.03, p=0.054, respectively) as well as AUQ (p=0.03). After controlling for drinking history, suggestibility significantly predicted “Feel,” “Like,” “High,” and “Intoxicated” peak scores during the open bar phase (p=0.03, p=0.009, p=0.03, p=0.03, respectively). There was no association between suggestibility and “Want More” alcohol. Suggestibility was positively associated with three positive expectancies (global positive; p=0.04, social expressiveness; p=0.005, relaxation; p=0.03), and one negative expectancy (cognitive and physical impairment; p=0.02). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These results indicate that social drinkers that were more suggestible had higher alcohol consumption, greater acute subjective response to alcohol, and more positive alcohol expectancies. As such, susceptibility to social influence may be an important determinant of alcohol consumption, and may provide insight into harmful drinking behavior such as binge drinking. Future analyses should examine the impact of suggestibility on alcohol-related phenotypes across the spectrum of drinking from social to binge and heavy drinking patterns.
2226 Influence of alcohol use disorder and comorbid psychopathology on discounting of delayed rewards
- Julia Swan, Joshua L. Gowin, Matthew E. Sloan, Reza Momenan, Vijay A. Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 2 / Issue S1 / June 2018
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 November 2018, p. 43
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been associated with greater discounting of delayed rewards relative to healthy controls. The relationship, however, has been inconsistent, likely because previous studies had relatively small sample sizes and inadequately controlled for comorbid psychopathology and substance use. In the present study, we analyzed one of the largest clinical research samples to date to assess the influence of alcohol use on delay discounting, and examine the influence of confounding variables including substance use disorder. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In total, 801 participants completed a delay discounting task where they chose between smaller, immediately available monetary amounts ($0–$90) and $100 available after a delay of 7–30 days. Delay discounting behavior was summarized as the natural log of k, a constant derived from a hyperbolic discounting equation. Participants also completed Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV disorders, 90-day Timeline Followback interviews, and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence. Participants were divided into 4 groups: healthy controls (n=298), past AUD (n=69), and current AUD with (n=224) and without (n=210) comorbid psychopathology or substance use disorder. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine the effect of group on delay discounting. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There were significant differences in the distribution of delay discounting scores by group (H=80.195, p<0.001). Healthy controls and past AUD showed lower levels of delay discounting than current AUD and current AUD+comorbidity groups with medium effect sizes (Cohen’s d=−0.635 and Cohen’s d=−0.614, respectively). There were nearly no differences between current AUD with and without comorbid psychopathology groups (Cohen’s d=−0.024). The past AUD group showed almost no difference relative to the healthy control group (Cohen’s d=0.007). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Individuals with current AUD were shown to discount rewards greater than those without current AUD, although comorbid psychopathology did not significantly affect discounting. Surprisingly, individuals with past AUD were more similar to controls than to those with current AUD. Our findings suggest that current problematic alcohol use is related to greater discounting of delayed rewards, but comorbid diagnoses do not significantly impact this relationship. However, once problematic patterns of alcohol use cease, delay discounting appears to return to levels comparable to healthy controls.
2314: Orexin/hypocretin receptor 2 (HCRTR2) in alcohol dependence diagnosis and severity: An exploratory investigation in the role of HCRTR2 rs2653349 polymorphism
- Tim D Klepp, Primavera Spagnolo, Pei-Hong Shen, Nancy Diazgranados, Colin Hodgkinson, Vijay Ramchandani, David Goldman
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 1 / Issue S1 / September 2017
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 May 2018, p. 7
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The preliminary analysis sought to retrospectively characterize the role of hypocretin receptor 2 (HCRTR2) in the development and prognosis of AD along with associated behavioral measures including smoking, self-reported drinking history, and neuroticism. Given the results in this study along with the paucity of information regarding the functional significance of rs2653349, we intend to comprehensively characterize HCRTR2 using haplotype analyses. We will then identify relationships between our haplotype analysis and IV alcohol self-administration using the Computer-Assisted Infusion System, and phenotypes identified in a sleep study. Furthermore, we aim at identifying functional loci in the hypocretin/orexin system by investigating differential allele expression in the orexin receptors in hippocampus tissue obtained from postmortem human brains. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This study examined 1569 European American and African American individuals between 18 and 65 years old, 922 of whom with a current diagnosis of AD. Participants were genotyped for HCRTR2 rs2653349 and ancestry was determined via a genome-wide panel of ancestry informative markers. AD was diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV (SCID-IV) for psychiatric disorders and recent alcohol use was assessed by 90-day Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) interviews. Smoking was assessed using the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and neuroticism was measured using the NEO Personality Inventory. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In European Americans, a significant difference was found in current AD diagnosis between AX carriers and GG carriers (z=−2.390, p=0.017). This relationship remained significant in a logistic regression model controlled for age and gender (R2=0.269, p=0.015). TLFB drinking measures were compared based on the median values to correct for the ceiling effect resulting from the assessment covering the past 90 days. Total drinks (U=8.280, p=0.004), number of drinking days (U=6.983, p=0.008), and average drinks per days (U=7.221, p=0.007) were all noted to significantly differ between the two allele groups among Caucasians. The associations between rs2653349 and total drinks (R2=0.115, p=0.023) and heavy drinking days (R2=0.190, p=0.015) remained significant in linear regressions controlled for age and gender. Furthermore, Caucasian AX carriers had a higher median number of drinking days relative to GG homozygotes among current AD positive subjects (U=6.937, p=0.012) and a lower median number of drinking days among current AD negative subjects (U=4.430, p=0.035). Among Caucasian AD negative subjects, there was a significantly greater frequency of smokers (χ2=3.550, p=0.046). In African American participants, there were no significant differences in AD diagnosis and in measures of AD severity by genotype. African American males diagnosed with current AD had higher rates of smoking in the AX group (χ2=4.969, p=0.017). No significant associations were found between rs2653349 and neuroticism in any of the cohorts analyzed in this sample. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The results suggest that, among Caucasians, AX carriers have an increased risk to develop AD independently of their age and gender. In addition, among individuals with a diagnosis of AD, AX carriers reported a greater number of drinking days, as measured by the TLFB, suggesting that this polymorphism also exerts an effect on the severity of the disease. This effect on increased alcohol consumption was absent in Caucasian AX carriers without current AD diagnosis. In future analysis, we will explore how different genetic profiles in HCRTR2, and also HCRTR1, may alter the orexin signaling pathway and how such alterations may predispose patients to develop AD and exacerbate AD once it develops.
2263: The effect of family history, alcohol expectancies, and sex differences on hangover symptoms following intravenous alcohol self-administration in nondependent drinkers
- Corbin Daniel Ester, Bethany Stangl, Aruna Gogineni, Lauren Blau, Vatsalya Vatsalya, Vijay Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 1 / Issue S1 / September 2017
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 May 2018, p. 33
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The current study examined hangover following IV alcohol self-administration (IV-ASA) using the Computer-Assisted Infusion System. The goal of the study was to identify predictors of hangover, including drinking history, alcohol sensitivity, family history, expectancies, and sex differences in nondependent drinkers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The study sample included 89 healthy, nondependent drinkers aged 21–45 years. After a screening to exclude any medical illness or psychiatric disorders, participants completed an IV-ASA session. Each session consisted of a 25-minute priming phase, during which participants were prompted to press a button to receive individually standardized alcohol infusions, followed by a 2-hour “open bar” phase, during which they were instructed to recreate a typical drinking experience. Results from the IV-ASA included peak and average BrAC. Drinking patterns were assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, which provided 3 subscales: consumption (AUDIT-C), dependence (AUDIT-D), and harmful drinking (AUDIT-H). Subjective response to alcohol was measured using the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ). The Alcohol Hangover Scale (AHS) was used to assess hangover for the period between participants’ departure from the study unit and 10 am the next morning. The Alcohol Effects Questionnaire (AEFQ) is a measure which includes 40 true/false statements about how alcohol typically makes respondents feel, and was used to measure alcohol expectancies. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results showed that 78% of participants endorsed having at least 1 hangover symptom following IV-ASA. The most commonly reported items were tired, thirsty, headache, and hangover. There was no association between hangover scores and the AUDIT-C or IV-ASA. Because alcohol consumption was not related to hangover symptoms, risky drinking behavior was examined. Results indicated that participants endorsing 4 or more items on the AUDIT-D plus AUDIT-H subscales showed significantly higher average hangover scores. Linear regression analyses indicated that alcohol hangover scores were associated with DEQ items feel, high, and intoxicated. Ongoing analyses are examining additional predictors of hangover including family history, alcohol expectancies, sex differences, and other alcohol sensitivity measures. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The results indicated that risky drinking patterns and alcohol response measures were positively associated with hangover symptoms in non-dependent drinks, while no correlation between consumption and hangover symptoms were found. Since previous research has shown than greater subjective response is associated with heavy drinking and predictive of alcohol use disorder, it is possible that hangover symptoms is a marker of this relationship. Since the role of hangover in the transition from heavy drinking to disorder still remains unclear, it will be important to characterize this relationship between alcohol sensitivity and hangover as a function of drinking patterns. This understanding may help to prevent this transition from at-risk drinking to alcohol dependent drinking.
2320: HPA axis predictors of cue-induced intravenous alcohol self-administration in non-dependent drinkers
- Honoreé White Brewton, Bethany L. Stangl, Laura E. Kwako, Rajita Sinha, Vijay Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 1 / Issue S1 / September 2017
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 May 2018, p. 35
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Alcohol craving, particularly in response to stress and alcohol cues, can lead to relapse in alcohol-dependent individuals. Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis markers such as the cortisol to corticotrophin (CORT:ACTH) ratio have been shown to be a significant predictor of alcohol relapse. Our objective was to evaluate the influence of HPA-axis measures on intravenous alcohol self-administration (IV-ASA) in binge and nonbinge drinkers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Healthy, non-dependent binge drinkers (n=14) and nonbinge drinkers (n=11) participated in this study. They underwent 3 personalized imagery sessions, where they heard 5-minute personalized audio scripts designed to trigger stress, alcohol craving, and neutral-relaxation states. Immediately following these cues, participants were given access to alcohol using a novel IV-ASA paradigm for 120 minutes. Serial blood samples were collected for cortisol and ACTH levels. Subjective measures were collected serially using the Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS), Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ), and Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ). Analyses were conducted using linear regression. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results showed that peak and average ACTH levels as well as the CORT:ACTH ratio during the early phase of the IV-ASA session following the stress and alcohol cues were significantly higher than the neutral script; this effect was seen primarily in binge drinkers. After script administration, a greater change from baseline for ACTH predicted time to peak BrAC during IV-ASA. Gender and binge group predicted AUQ MAX (peak alcohol craving over the entire study session) and WANT MAX (peak “want more alcohol” scores over the session). There was a significant correlation between IV-ASA and increased ACTH peak and average values in binge drinkers. The DEQ and AUQ measures were positively correlated with ACTH peak and ACTH change from baseline. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These findings, to our knowledge, are the first demonstration that exposure to both stress and alcohol cues lead to an increase in ACTH during cue-induced IV-ASA, particularly in binge drinkers. These results suggest that changes in HPA-axis reactivity following stress and alcohol may be important determinants of alcohol consumption in non-dependent binge drinkers.
2276: The impact of social influence and impulsivity on IV alcohol self-administration in non-dependent drinkers
- Alyssa Schneider, Bethany L. Stangl, Elgin R. Yalin, Jodi M. Gilman, Vijay Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 1 / Issue S1 / September 2017
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 May 2018, pp. 33-34
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Impulsivity is a significant predictor of alcohol use and drinking behavior, and has been shown to be a critical trait in those with alcohol use disorder. Suggestibility, or susceptibility to social influence, has been shown to correlate with impulsivity, with highly suggestible individuals being more likely to make impulsive decisions influenced by peer groups. However, the relationship between social influence and drinking behavior is unclear. Our objective was to describe the relationship between social influence and impulsivity traits using the social delayed discounting task and potential differences in intravenous alcohol self-administration (IV-ASA) behavior. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Healthy, non-dependent drinkers (n=20) completed a CAIS session, which consisted of an initial 25-minute priming phase, where subjects were prompted to push a button to receive individually standardized IV alcohol infusions, followed by a 125-minute phase during which they could push the button for additional infusions. IV-ASA measures included the peak (PEAK) and average (AVG) BrAC and Number of Button Presses (NBP). Participants completed a social delayed discounting task (SDDT), where participants were presented with the choice of a small, sooner (SS) reward or a large, later (LL) reward. Before starting the task, participants chose peers who selected either the impulsive (SI) or non-impulsive choice (S). Intermittently, the peers’ choice was not shown (X) or different choices (D) were selected. Participants also completed the MISS, the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, and the NEO personality inventory. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Participants with higher suggestibility scores had greater NBP, AVG, and PEAK BrAC in the early phase of the IV-ASA session. Higher scores on the MISS were also correlated with higher impulsivity scores including the NEO Neuroticism (N-factor) measure, BIS-11, and UPPS-P. Results also showed that the MISS score was inversely correlated with the percent of impulsive choices in the SDDT, but that this was independent of peers’ impulsive or nonimpulsive choices. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These results indicate that non-dependent drinkers that were more susceptible to social influence had heavier drinking patterns, higher IV-ASA, and higher scores on impulsivity measures. In addition, individuals that were more susceptible to social influence made more impulsive choices in general, but those choices were not affected by peer decisions during the task. As such, susceptibility to social influence may be an important determinant of impulsive choices, particularly in relation to alcohol consumption.
2341: Association of chronic stress with alcohol seeking and health behaviors
- Courtney Vaughan, Bethany Stangl, Rajita Sinha, Vijay Ramchandani
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science / Volume 1 / Issue S1 / September 2017
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 May 2018, p. 36
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The objective of this analysis was to characterize the impact of stress, both early life and chronic, on intravenous alcohol self-administration (IV-ASA) in healthy non-dependent drinkers using the Computer-Assisted Infusion System (CAIS). Personality measures also have shown to impact drinking behavior, particularly impulsivity. Few studies have assessed the impact of stress and impulsivity on drinking behaviors in a non-dependent population. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Healthy non-dependent drinkers (n=28) completed a CAIS session, where they push a button adlib to self-administer standardized IV alcohol infusions. Participants completed the Cumulative Chronic Stress interview and the Early Life Stress Questionnaire (ELSQ) for stress measures. The Cumulative Chronic Stress interview was broken up into 4 sections: major life events, life traumas, recent life events, and chronic stressors. The number of endorsed events was added up to create 4 separate scores. Subjective response and craving measures were collected serially using the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) and Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ). The Impaired Control Scale (ICS) assessed failed control over recent drinking in the past 6 months. Impulsivity was assessed using the NEO personality inventory, which included the N-impulsive sub-facet, as well as the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results showed early life stress events (ELSQ) are related to more chronic stressors in the cumulative chronic stress interview (p=0.005). Participants with higher chronic stress scores showed lower subjective effects, as measured by the DEQ, following the priming exposure (p=0.036) but had more craving for alcohol as measured by the AUQ (p=0.009). A regression analysis showed the number of chronic stressful events predicted ICS failed attempts to control drinking (p=0.034), after covarying for sex. Participants with more chronic stressful events showed more impulsivity on the N-impulsivity measure (p=0.034) and the UPPS-P positive urgency measure (p=0.005). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Non-dependent drinkers with more early life stress tend to have a higher number of chronic stressful events. More chronically stressful events were associated with feeling less effects of alcohol and higher craving for alcohol. Participants with more chronically stressful events also appear to have more failed attempts at controlling their drinking. Future analysis will assess for mediation and moderation of these factors. Chronically stressful events and impulsive behaviors could serve as important areas for intervention for better treatment outcomes for alcohol use disorders.