4 results
Can deinstitutionalised care be provided for those at risk of violent offending?
- Claire Henderson, Jonathan Bindman, Graham Thornicroft
-
- Journal:
- Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale / Volume 7 / Issue 1 / April 1998
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 11 October 2011, pp. 42-51
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objective - The aim of this article is to explain the current status of deinstitutionalisation and of community care development in the UK. Design — Literature review of articles and reports on deinstitutionalisation. Setting — Articles included in the review related either to the whole of the UK, to England and Wales, or to a specific area such as London. Main outcome measures — The review was carried out pertaining to the question of the extent to which community care can or should take over the functions of the asylum, with particular reference to those at risk of behaving violently. These functions include those that are manifest, or explicit, and those that are latent, or unintended but implicit (Bachrach, 1976). Results — The example of patients at risk of violent behaviour is one that highlights the continuing relevance of both these sets of functions, which are argued to be exerting a powerful influence on the processes of asylum closure and community care development. This influence is seen in delayed asylum closure, transinstitutionalisation (the shift of some patients from asylums to other institutions), and the institutionalisation of aspects of community care. Conclusions — Both the manifest and the latent functions of asylums must be acknowledged by those involved in planning community care; where it is felt desirable that community care does not take over certain functions, the consequences of this must be anticipated so that they can be prevented or dealt with in other ways.
The Italian asylum law: moving towards the deinstitutionalization model1
- Giuseppe Dell'Acqua
-
- Journal:
- Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale / Volume 8 / Issue 2 / June 1999
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 11 October 2011, pp. 105-111
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
An evaluation is currently underway concerning the changes which have taken place in Italy in the twenty years following the reform law. The qualitative and quantitative changes are being analyzed based on a possible shared definition of the processes of deinstitutionalization. This theme is generally the object of misundestandings and cliches. The need for change in clinical and istitutional psychiatry is the indispensable premise for the development of community psychiatry and the growth of a culture of public psychiatry in general. In this framework, an attempt is being made to define the meaning of change through the growth of the active participation of persona affected with mental disorders and their families in treatment, the participation of ordinary citizens, the spread of services in the community and the quantitative increase of the number of personnel involved in public community services. Emblematic of this change is the increase in the number of psychiatrists working in the public sector, from 700 to 7,000, over this twenty year period. The changes which must take place in psychiatric practice must also be emphasized: the heirarchies, the relationships, the search for non-health resources and enhancing the value of operators as subjects outside of their institutional role. The various forms of resistence which have retarded, and continue to retard, the process of change are also considered: the persistence of clinical cultural models, administrative inertia, the defense of acquired privileges by medical and nursing lobbies, the interests of the private, commercial and religious sectors and political manipulation. In any case, the beginning of a process of change which contains all the potential of a real project for prevention is judged positively.
Evaluating the closure or downsizing of psychiatric hospitals: social or clinical event?
- Alain D. Lesage
-
- Journal:
- Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale / Volume 9 / Issue 3 / September 2000
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 11 October 2011, pp. 163-170
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives – The evaluation matrix recently proposed by Tansella and Thornicroft suggests that the field of social and epidemiological psychiatry has focussed more on the individual/patient level of mental health care services than the system level. Moreover, phenomena such as deinstitutionalisation have been examined more as clinical events than as social ones. The aims here are to deepen our understanding of deinstitutionalisation, particularly as regards the downsizing/closure and role of psychiatric hospitals. Methods – I begin by reviewing the manifest and latent functions of psychiatric hospitals. This is followed by a discussion of how these functions must be met by any comprehensive community-oriented system of mental health care for severely mentally ill patients. Also, in order to reframe the downsizing/closure of psychiatric hospitals as a social event for the field of social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, I posit that the process of deinstitutionalisation is driven today by the same forces that were present at the outset of the movement. Results – I review four recent series of studies addressing primarily the outcomes, but also other aspects, of the downsizing/closure of psychiatric hospitals, with a view to illustrating the methods used, the results obtained and the blind angles missed in this research. Conclusions – Lessons are drawn on how to fill certain vacant cells of the matrix.
The Italian PROGRES project on non-hospital residential facilities
- Gruppo Nazionale Progres
-
- Journal:
- Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale / Volume 10 / Issue 4 / December 2001
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 11 October 2011, pp. 260-275
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objective – The ‘PROGRES’ (PROGetto RESidenze' Residential Project) project has 3 aims: 1. To survey all Italian psychiatric Non-Hospital Residential Facilities (NHRF) (Phase 1); 2. To assess in detail 20% of the NHRFs and the patients living there (Phase 2); and 3. To carry on training programmes for the mental health workers of these facilities (Phase 3). We report here the results of Phase 1. Methods: – All NHRFs were surveyed using a structured interview administered to the manager of the facility. In some cases, this information was supplemented with data gathered from other mental health workers at the NHRFs. Results – On May 31, 2000, there were in Italy 1,370 NHRFs with 17,138 beds, giving an average number of beds per facility of 12.5 and a rate of 2.98 beds per 10,000 inhabitants. This rate varies greatly between regions, with a ratio of 1:10 between the two regions with the lowest and the highest bed rates. Seventy-three percent of the NHRFs have a 24-hour staff coverage; more than 50% are directly managed by the NHS Departments of Mental Health and more than three-quarters of the NHRFs are directly funded by the NHS. In the course of 1999 38% of the NHRFs discharged no patients, and another 32% discharged fewer than 3 patients. In about half of the NHRFs the most common patient age group was 40-59 years. In the Italian NHRFs there are 11,240 full-time mental health workers, plus several thousand half-time staff. The average number of full-time mental health workers in each NHRF is 8.2. In 58% of the NHRFs the operational chief is a psychiatrist; some 40% of the overall number of mental health workers in the NHRFs have no specific psychiatric training. The total number of patients resident in the NHRFs is 15,943; among them, 58% have never been admitted to a mental hospital, 40% have been admitted and a small percentage (1.6%) has been previously admitted to a forensic mental hospital. The availability of NHRF beds is negatively associated with the availability of non-hospital facilities (e.g., community mental health centres, day-centres) and positively associated with the number of beds in private psychiatric facilities in each region. Discussion – The current rate of NHRF beds is higher than the officially recommended national standard (2/10,000 inhabitants). However, there is a great variability between regions, which is related to the overall provision of different types of psychiatric facilities. Most NHRFs provide intensive care, and the continuum of residential facilities with different types of care, support, degree of autonomy, etc. recommended by several authors for the long-term treatment of severe patients with different disabilities, seem to be lacking. NHRFs have a very low patient turnover rate, and this may create problems in the future. Conclusions – The PROGRES project is the first national study ever carried out in Italy to evaluate a specific type of psychiatric facilities in the context of the new system of psychiatric care. When all the data will be available, it will be possible to assess in detail for the first time a national representative sample of severe, long-stay patients and the care they are receiving; on this basis, it will also be possible to recommend evidence-based policies aimed at improving the care of the severely mentally ill.