Weart, S., The Rise of Nuclear Fear (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slovic, P., Perception of Risk and the Future of Nuclear Power (Internet), Physics and Society Newsletter, 23:1 (January 1994), 1–5; 2. Available from: www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/1994/january/ajan94.html#a1Google Scholar

Carson, R., Silent Spring (Greenwich: Fawcett, 1962), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

Ibid., pp. 3.Google Scholar

Stoutenborough, J. W., Sturgess, S. G., and Vedlitz, A., Knowledge, Risk, and Policy Support: Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power, Energy Policy, 62 (2013), 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sontag, S., Illness as Metaphor (New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux, 1978).Google Scholar

Clean Air Task Force, The Toll from Coal: An Updated Assessment of Death and Disease from America’s Dirtiest Energy Source (Internet) (September 2010). Available from: www.catf.us/resources/publications/view/138Google Scholar

Ives, M., Indonesia Coal Mining Boom is Leaving Trail of Destruction (Internet), Yale Environment 360 (December 17, 2015). Available from: http://e360.yale.edu/feature/indonesian_coal_mining_boom_is_leaving_trail_of_destruction/2941/Google Scholar

Coal Dust Kills 23,000 per Year in EU: Report (Internet), Phys.org (July 4, 2016). Available from: http://phys.org/news/2016–07-coal-year-eu.htmlGoogle Scholar

Jorgensen, T. J., Strange Glow: The Story of Radiation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016), p. 365.Google Scholar

Havenaar, J. M., Bromet, E. J., and Gluzman, S., The 30-Year Mental Health Legacy of the Chernobyl Disaster, World Psychiatry 15:2 (June 2016), 181–182.Google Scholar

Fish, E., The Forgotten Legacy of the Banqiao Dam Collapse (Internet), The Economic Observer (February 8, 2013). Available from: www.eeo.com.cn/ens/2013/0208/240078.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers (Internet). Available from: www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdfGoogle Scholar

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Dams – 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure (Internet). Available from: www.infrastructurereportcard.org/dams/Google Scholar

Gens, R., Global Distribution of Coal and Peat Fires (Internet), Interactive World Map of Coal and Peat Fires, Elsevier. Available from: http://booksite.elsevier.com/brochures/coalpeatfires/interactivemap.htmlGoogle Scholar

EPA, Quantity of RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) Hazardous Waste Generated and Managed (Internet). EPA’s Report on the Environment, US Environmental Protection Agency. Available from: https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator.cfm?i=54Google Scholar

Summary of Wind Turbine Accident Data (Internet), Caithness Windfarm Information Forum. Available from: www.caithnesswindfarms.co.uk/AccidentStatistics.htmGoogle Scholar

Walker, J. S., Reactor at the Fault: The Bodega Bay Nuclear Plant Controversy, 1958–1964 – A Case Study in the Politics of Technology, Pacific Historical Review, 59:3 (August 1990), 323–348, 324.Google Scholar

Jundt, T., Greening the Red, White, and Blue: The Bomb, Big Business, and Consumer Resistance in Postwar America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 97–98.Google Scholar

Hamblin, J. D. and Dispassionate, A, Objective Effort: Negotiating the First Study on the Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation, Journal of the History of Biology, 40:1 (March 2007), 147–177; 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Records of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) (Internet), Guide to Federal Records, US National Archives. Available from: www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/326.html#326.3.3Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences (NAS), The Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation: A Report to The Public, 9 Washington, D.C. 1956), 1.Google Scholar

Leviero, A., Scientists Term Radiation a Peril to Future of Man, New York Times (June 13, 1956).Google Scholar

Pauling, L., Genetic Effects of Weapons Tests, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (December 1962), 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services (NIH), How Common is Stillbirth (Internet). Available from: www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/stillbirth/topicinfo/Pages/how-common.aspxGoogle Scholar

Reinou, S., Bae, J. Y., and Lim, K. J., Fear of the Unknown: Ionizing Radiation Exposure During Pregnancy, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206:6 (June 2012), 456–462.Google Scholar

UNSCEAR, Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly (Internet) (2000). Available from: www.unscear.org/docs/reports/gareport.pdfGoogle Scholar

Vastag, B., Scientific, Political Debate Continues on Methods for Estimating Fallout Exposure, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97:17 (September 2005), 1240–1242.Google Scholar

Dalager, N. A., Kang, H., and Mahan, C. M., Cancer Mortality Among the Highest Exposed US Atmospheric Nuclear Test Participants, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 42:8 (August 2000), 798–805.Google Scholar

Committee to Assess the Scientific Information for the Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program, Assessment of the Scientific Information for the Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program (Internet), US National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council (2005), 108. Available from: http://nap.edu/catalog/11279.htmlGoogle Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics (CDC, NCHS), Data Brief No. 88 – 75 Years of Mortality in the United States, 1935–2010 (Internet) (March 2012). Available from: www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db88.htmGoogle Scholar

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (UNPD), World Fertility Data 2015 (Internet). Available from: www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/dataset/fertility/wfd2015.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Wellerstein, A., The Demon Core and the Strange Death of Louis Slotin (Internet), The New Yorker (May 21, 2016). Available from: www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/demon-core-the-strange-death-of-louis-slotinGoogle Scholar

Wellock, T. R., Critical Masses: Opposition to Nuclear Power in California, 1958–1978 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1998), pp. 17–67.Google Scholar

Meehan, R. L., The Atom and the Fault: Experts, Earthquakes, and Nuclear Power (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Walker, J. S., Reactor at the Fault: The Bodega Bay Nuclear Plant Controversy, 1958–1964: A Caser Study in the Politics of Technology, Pacific Historical Review, 59:3 (August 1990), 323–348; 330–331.Google Scholar

Daly, J., Nuclear Fault Line – Bodega Head (Internet), Sonoma Magazine. Available from: www.sonomamag.com/nuclear-fault-line/Google Scholar

Walker, , p. 344.Google Scholar

Meehan, , p. 13.Google Scholar

Walker, , p. 348.Google Scholar

Alliance, Clamshell, Declaration of Nuclear Resistance (Internet). Available from: www.clamshellalliance.net/legacy/2010/03/06/declaration-of-nuclear-resistance-revised-version-adopted-november-1977-at-the-clamshell-congress/Google Scholar

Lovins, A. B., Energy Strategy: The Roads Not Taken? Foreign Affairs (October 1976), 65–96; 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ibid., pp. 92–93.Google Scholar

Byrne, J. and Hoffman, S. M., Nuclear Power and Technological Authoritarianism. Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 7:3–4 (1987), 658–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weart, pp. 189–190.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H. P., Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies, British Journal of Political Science, 16 (1986), 57–85.Google Scholar

Nehring, H., Cold War, Apocalypse and Peaceful Atoms: Interpretations of Nuclear Energy in the British and West German Anti-Nuclear Weapons Movements, 1955–1964. Historical Social Research, 29:3 (2004), 150–170; 154.Google Scholar

Hecht, G., The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity After World War II (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Peierls, R. E., Britain in the Atomic Age, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (June 1970), 40–46.Google Scholar

Nehring, , p. 155; Note 22.Google Scholar

Jungk, R., Der Atomstaat: Vom Fortschritt in die Unmenschlichkeit (Hamburg: Rowohlt rororo, 1977), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar

Nealey, S. M., Melber, B. D., Rankin, W. L., Public Opinion and Nuclear Energy (Lexington, MA: D.C. Health, 1983).Google Scholar

Schell, J., The Fate of the Earth (New York: Knopf, 1982), p. 12.Google Scholar

Ibid., pp. 60–61.Google Scholar

Bolsen, T. and Cook, F. L., Public Opinion on Energy Policy: 1974–2006, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 72:2 (2008), 364–388.Google Scholar

Fairhall, D. and Walker, M., USSR Finally Admits Chernobyl Disaster (Internet), The Guardian (April 30, 1986). Available from: www.theguardian.com/world/2006/apr/24/russia.ukraineGoogle Scholar

Greenwald, J., Deadly Meltdown, Time, 127:19 (May 12, 1986), 38–45, 41.Google Scholar

Dahlburg, J. T, Chernobyl: Grim New Assessment – Fallout Study says ‘Hundreds of Times’ More People May Have Suffered Fatal Exposure Than Had Been Thought (Internet), Los Angeles Times (April 14, 1992). Available from: http://articles.latimes.com/1992–04-14/news/mn-170_1_fatal-exposureGoogle Scholar

Kim, Y., Kim, M., and Kim, W., Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster on Global Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power, Energy Policy, 61 (2013), 822–828.Google Scholar

de Boer, C. and Catsburg, I., The Impact of Nuclear Accidents on Attitudes Toward Nuclear Energy, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 52:2 (1988), 254–261.Google Scholar

Limiting the Fallout (Internet) The Economist (July 20, 2013). Available from: www.economist.com/news/china/21582016-rare-protest-prompts-government-scrap-plans-build-uranium-processing-plantGoogle Scholar

He, G., Mol, A. P. J., Zhang, L., and Lu, Y., Public Participation and Trust in Nuclear Power Development in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23 (2013), 1–11.Google Scholar

Sun, C. and Zhu, X., Evaluating the Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power in China: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Survey, Energy Policy, 69 (2014), 397–405; 403.Google Scholar

Rankin, W. L., Melder, B. D., Overcast, T. D., and Nealey, S. M., Nuclear Power and the Public: An Update of Collected Survey Research on Nuclear Power (Seattle: Battelle, 1981), p. 128.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center, Major Gas Between the Public, Scientists on Key Issues (Internet) (July 2015). Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/interactives/public-scientists-opinion-gap/Google Scholar