Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:12:24.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Of Research Cycles and Publication Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2016

Kirstie M. McClure
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This response to Prof. Lieberman’s essay questions its analogy between “biomedical research” and the academic discipline of political science. Focused on the disanalogy of scope and scale between the two, it takes issue not with the “criterial framework” he offers, but with the quality of argumentation that leads us there. Supplementing the essay’s impressionistic account of editorial practice with evidence drawn from the New England Journal of Medicine and the publishing history of APSA journals since the 1960s, I suggest that the issue here is not simply editorial virtue and professional norms, but differences in the material and institutional bases of the journals’ alternative publication models.

Type
Reflections Symposium
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 1076 - 1079
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colgrove, James. 2006a. “Ethics and Politics of Compulsory HPV Vaccination.” NEJM, December 7, 355(23): 2389–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgrove, James 2006b State of Immunity: The Politics of Vaccination in Twentieth-Century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Drazen, Jeffrey M. 2000. “Looking Forward to Serving You Every Week.” NEJM, July 6, 343: 57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazen, Jeffrey M. 2015. “Fifteen Years.” NEJM, October 9, 373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drolet, Brian C. and Lorenzi, Nancy M.. 2001. “Translational Research: Understanding the Continuum from Bench to Bedside.” Translational Research 157(1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, Richard. 2015. “Offline: What is medicine’s 5 Sigma?” The Lancet, Vol. 385 (April 11): 1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Edward J. and Case, Kathleen. 2004 “The URM: Twenty-Five Years Old.” Science Editor 24(1): 17–21.Google Scholar
Kassirer, Jerome P. 1991. “The Relman Years at the Journal.” NEJM, July 4, 325: 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, Jerome P. 1992a. “Journals in Bits and Bytes.” NEJM, January 16, 326: 195–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, Jerome P. 1992b. “A New Book Review Editor.” NEJM, May 21, 325.Google Scholar
Kassirer, Jerome P. 1996. “The Journal’s New Look.” NEJM, July 4, 335: 50–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, Jerome P. 1999a. “Should Medical Journals Try to Influence Political Debates?” NEJM, February 11, 340: 466–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, Jerome P. 1999b. “Editorial Independence.” NEJM, May 27, 340: 671–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kassirer, Jerome P. 1999c. “Goodbye, for Now.” NEJM, August 26, 341: 686–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, Jerome P. and Angell, M.. 1995. “The Internet and the Journal.” NEJM, June 22, 332: 1710–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, Jerome P. ,and Angell, M.. 1997. “Controversial Journal Editorials.” NEJM, November 13, 337: 1460–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar