Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T05:30:59.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States – Certain Methodologies and Their Application to Anti-Dumping Proceedings Involving China (US–Anti-Dumping Methodologies (China)), DS471

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2017

Kholofelo Kugler
Kholofelo Kugler*
Affiliation:
Works in the Advisory Centre on WTO Law, Geneva but writes in a wholly personal capacity
*
Email: Kholofelo.Kugler@acwl.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This dispute concerns China's claims regarding three issues related to certain anti-dumping measures applied by the United States Department of Commerce (USDOC): the use of the weighted average-to-transaction (WA-T) method in dumping margin calculations, the treatment of multiple companies as a non-market economy-wide entity (NME-wide entity), and the way that USDOC determines anti-dumping duty rates for this type of entity and the level of these duty rates.

Type
Case Summaries
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 16 , Issue 4: Symposium on State-Owned Enterprises in China , October 2017 , pp. 753 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © Kholofelo Kugler 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Panel Report, United States–Anti-Dumping Methodologies (China), paras. 2.1.

2 Ibid. para. 7.9.

3 Ibid. para. 7.11.

4 Ibid. para. 7.103–7.104. SAS programming errors were not challenged with regard to the Steel Cylinders investigation.

5 Ibid. para. 7.157.

6 Ibid. para. 7.187.

7 Ibid. para. 7.220.

8 Appellate Body Report, United States–Anti-Dumping Methodologies (China), paras. 5.46.

9 Ibid. para. 5.2.

10 Ibid. paras. 5.31, 5.45, 5.46–5.48, 5.49.

11 Ibid. para. 5.101.

12 Appellate Body Report, United States – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Measures on Large Residential Washers from Korea, DS464, paras. 5.124, 5.129.

13 Referred to by the Appellate Body as W-T.

14 Appellate Body Report, United States–Anti-Dumping Methodologies (China), paras. 5.107–5.108.

15 Panel Report, United States–Anti-Dumping Methodologies (China), para. 7.227.

16 Ibid. para. 7.239.

17 Ibid. paras. 7.271, 7.301.

18 Policy Bulletin No. 05.1, the Anti-Dumping Manual, and USDOC's anti-dumping determinations.

19 Panel Report, United States–Anti-Dumping Methodologies (China), paras. 7.313–7.332, 7.339.

20 Ibid. paras. 7.367–7.368.

21 Ibid. para. 7.369.

22 Ibid. paras. 7.371–7.377.

23 Ibid. paras. 7.387–7.381.

24 Ibid. para. 7.382.

25 Ibid. para. 7.384.

26 Ibid. para. 7.388.

27 Ibid. para. 7.389.

28 Appellate Body Report, Argentina – Measures Affecting the Importation of Goods, DS438, para. 5.152.

29 Panel Report, United States–Anti-Dumping Methodologies (China), paras. 7.473–7.475.

30 Ibid. para. 7.476.

31 Ibid. para. 7.479.

32 Ibid. para. 7.497–7.499.

33 Ibid. paras. 7.500–7.508.

34 Appellate Body Report, United States–Anti-Dumping Methodologies (China), paras. 5.111.

35 Ibid. paras. 5.107–5.108.

36 Ibid. para. 5.163–5.164.

37 Ibid. para. 5.179.