Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:11:54.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma

from Section 3 - Myeloma: clinical entities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2013

Stephen A. Schey
Affiliation:
Department of Haematology, King’s College Hospital, London
Kwee L. Yong
Affiliation:
Department of Haematology, University College Hospital, London
Robert Marcus
Affiliation:
Department of Haematology, King’s College Hospital, London
Kenneth C. Anderson
Affiliation:
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
Get access

Summary

The identification of a monoclonal protein in serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) is a common event requiring medical consultation. A monoclonal protein may be the hallmark of a malignant disease, such as multiple myeloma or Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (and less often of other lymphoproliferative disorders), of diseases associated with a malignant plasma cell clone, such as AL amyloidosis or other plasma cell related disorders, or, quite commonly may have no direct impact and belong to monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS). Jan Waldenstrom introduced the term “essential hyperglobulinemia” in order to describe patients who had a small serum protein electrophoretic spike but no evidence of overt multiple myeloma (MM), Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM), primary amyloidosis (AL), or related disorders. The seminal work by Kyle indicated that some patients with this monoclonal gammopathy develop MM, or WM or AL or other lymphoproliferative malignancies, and introduced the term “monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance” (MGUS)[1]. Kyle also described patients with histologic and biochemical features of myeloma (bone marrow clonal plasma cells (BMPC) involvement of 10% or higher, presence of a serum M-protein value higher than 3 g/dl) that did not have lytic bone lesions, anemia, renal impairment or other clinical manifestations of myeloma who remained stable, with no need for chemotherapy, for several years[2]. Alexanian also presented data on “indolent myeloma”[3], that included patients who had no clinical features of overt myeloma such as anemia and renal dysfunction and had fewer than three lytic bone lesions. Among these patients, median time to initiation of chemotherapy was two years, but some patients remained stable for several years. Thus, the term “smoldering” MM or “asymptomatic” or “indolent” MM, entered the clinical practice. The definitions, however, were not strict among different groups. In 2003 a consensus paper defined MGUS and asymptomatic or smoldering myeloma (Table 10.1). MGUS requires that M-protein in serum is <30 g/l and that bone marrow clonal plasma cells are <10% with no evidence of other B cell proliferative disorders and no end organ damage (anemia, renal impairment, hypercalcemia, lytic bone lesions).

Type
Chapter
Information
Myeloma
Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
, pp. 121 - 133
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kyle, R. A.Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Natural history in 241 cases. Am. J. Med. 1978;64(5):814–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, R. A., Greipp, P. R.Smoldering multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 1980;302(24):1347–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexanian, R.Localized and indolent myeloma. Blood 1980;56(3):521–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Kyle, R. A., Durie, B. G., Rajkumar, S. V., et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia 2010;24(6):1121–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br. J. Haematol. 2003;121(5):749–57.
Merlini, G., Stone, M. J.Dangerous small B-cell clones. Blood 2006;108(8):2520–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldenstrom, J.Studies on conditions associated with disturbed gamma globulin formation (gammopathies). Harvey Lect. 1960;56:211–31.Google Scholar
Dammacco, F., Waldenstrom, J.Bence Jones proteinuria in benign monoclonal gammopathies. Incidence and characteristics. Acta Med. Scand. 1968;184(5):403–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelsson, U., Bachmann, R., Hallen, J.Frequency of pathological proteins (M-components) on 6,995 sera from an adult population. Acta Med. Scand. 1966;179(2):235–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saleun, J. P., Vicariot, M., Deroff, P., Morin, J. F.Monoclonal gammopathies in the adult population of Finistere, France. J. Clin. Pathol. 1982;35(1):63–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, R. A., Finkelstein, S., Elveback, L. R., Kurland, L. T.Incidence of monoclonal proteins in a Minnesota community with a cluster of multiple myeloma. Blood 1972;40(5):719–24.Google Scholar
Landgren, O., Gridley, G., Turesson, I. et al. Risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and subsequent multiple myeloma among African American and white veterans in the United States. Blood 2006;107(3):904–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, R. A., Therneau, T. M., Rajkumar, S. V. et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354(13):1362–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, R. A., Therneau, T. M., Rajkumar, S. V. et al. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346(8):564–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dispenzieri, A., Katzmann, J. A., Kyle, R. A. et al. Prevalence and risk of progression of light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Lancet 2010;375(9727):1721–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landgren, O., Kyle, R. A., Pfeiffer, R. M. et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood 2009;113(22):5412–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, B. M., Abadie, J., Verma, P., Howard, R. S., Kuehl, W. M.A monoclonal gammopathy precedes multiple myeloma in most patients. Blood 2009;113(22):5418–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajkumar, S. V., Kyle, R. A., Therneau, T. M. et al. Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood 2005;106(3):812–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, F., Petrucci, M. T., Guffanti, A. et al. Proposal and validation of prognostic scoring systems for IgG and IgA monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15(13):4439–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Persona, E., Vidriales, M. B., Mateo, G. et al. New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood 2007;110(7):2586–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiecchio, L., Dagrada, G. P., Ibrahim, A. H. et al. Timing of acquisition of deletion 13 in plasma cell dyscrasias is dependent on genetic context. Haematologica 2009;94(12):1708–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiecchio, L., Dagrada, G. P., Protheroe, R. K. et al. Loss of 1p and rearrangement of MYC are associated with progression of smouldering myeloma to myeloma: sequential analysis of a single case. Haematologica 2009;94(7):1024–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhan, F., Hardin, J., Kordsmeier, B. et al. Global gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone marrow plasma cells. Blood 2002;99(5):1745–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhan, F., Barlogie, B., Arzoumanian, V. et al. Gene-expression signature of benign monoclonal gammopathy evident in multiple myeloma is linked to good prognosis. Blood 2000;109(4):1692–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichiorri, F., Suh, S. S., Ladetto, M. et al. MicroRNAs regulate critical genes associated with multiple myeloma pathogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2008;105(35):12 885–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pichiorri, F., Suh, S. S., Rocci, A. et al. Downregulation of p53-inducible microRNAs 192, 194, and 215 impairs the p53/MDM2 autoregulatory loop in multiple myeloma development. Cancer Cell 2010;18(4):367–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Politou, M., Terpos, E., Anagnostopoulos, A. et al. Role of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin and macrophage protein 1-alpha (MIP-1a) in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Br. J. Haematol. 2004;126(5):686–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulos, A., Eleftherakis-Papaiakovou, V., Kastritis, E. et al. Serum concentrations of angiogenic cytokines in Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia: the ratio of angiopoietin-1 to angiopoietin-2 and angiogenin correlate with disease severity. Br. J. Haematol. 2007;137(6):560–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillengass, J., Zechmann, C., Bauerle, T. et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging identifies a subgroup of patients with asymptomatic monoclonal plasma cell disease and pathologic microcirculation. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15(9):3118–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hose, D., Moreaux, J., Meissner, T. et al. Induction of angiogenesis by normal and malignant plasma cells. Blood 2009;114(1):128–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landgren, O., Kyle, R. A., Hoppin, J. A. et al. Pesticide exposure and risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in the Agricultural Health Study. Blood 2009;113(25):6386–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, L. M., Gridley, G., Check, D., Landgren, O.Risk of multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among white and black male United States veterans with prior autoimmune, infectious, inflammatory, and allergic disorders. Blood 2008;111(7):3388–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, B. M., Minter, A., Abadie, J. et al. Patterns of monoclonal immunoglobulins and serum free light chains are significantly different in black compared to white monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) patients. Am. J. Hematol. 2011;86(6):475–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landgren, O., Linet, M. S., McMaster, M. L. et al. Familial characteristics of autoimmune and hematologic disorders in 8,406 multiple myeloma patients: a population-based case-control study. Int. J. Cancer 2006;118(12):3095–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vachon, C. M., Kyle, R. A., Therneau, T. M. et al. Increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy in first-degree relatives of patients with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood 2009;114(4):785–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristinsson, S. Y., Pfeiffer, R. M., Bjorkholm, M. et al. Arterial and venous thrombosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: a population-based study. Blood 2010;115(24):4991–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristinsson, S. Y., Tang, M., Pfeiffer, R. M. et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of skeletal fractures: a population-based study. Blood 2010;116(15):2651–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blade, J., Dimopoulos, M., Rosinol, L., Rajkumar, S. V., Kyle, R. A.Smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: current diagnostic criteria, new predictors of outcome, and follow-up recommendations. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28(4):690–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, R. A., Remstein, E. D., Therneau, T. M. et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;356(25):2582–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dispenzieri, A., Kyle, R. A., Katzmann, J. A. et al. Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Blood 2008;111(2):785–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosinol, L., Blade, J., Esteve, J. et al. Smoldering multiple myeloma: natural history and recognition of an evolving type. Br. J. Haematol. 2003;123(4):631–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosinol, L., Carrio, A., Blade, J. et al. Comparative genomic hybridisation identifies two variants of smoldering multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2005;130(5):729–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moulopoulos, L. A., Dimopoulos, M. A., Smith, T. L. et al. Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 1995;13(1):251–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillengass, J., Fechtner, K., Weber, M. A. et al. Prognostic significance of focal lesions in whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28(9):1606–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blade, J., Rosinol, L.Smoldering multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2006;7(3):237–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hjorth, M., Hellquist, L., Holmberg, E. et al. Initial versus deferred melphalan-prednisone therapy for asymptomatic multiple myeloma stage I–a randomized study. Myeloma Group of Western Sweden. Eur. J. Haematol. 1993;50(2):95–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grignani, G., Gobbi, P. G., Formisano, R. et al. A prognostic index for multiple myeloma. Br. J. Cancer 1996;73(9):1101–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riccardi, A., Mora, O., Tinelli, C. et al. Long-term survival of stage I multiple myeloma given chemotherapy just after diagnosis or at progression of the disease: a multicentre randomized study. Cooperative Group of Study and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Br. J. Cancer 2000;82(7):1254–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajkumar, S. V., Gertz, M. A., Lacy, M. Q. et al. Thalidomide as initial therapy for early-stage myeloma. Leukemia 2003;17(4):775–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, D., Rankin, K., Gavino, M., Delasalle, K., Alexanian, R.Thalidomide alone or with dexamethasone for previously untreated multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21(1):16–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlogie, B., van Rhee, F., Shaughnessy, J. D., Jr. et al. Seven-year median time to progression with thalidomide for smoldering myeloma: partial response identifies subset requiring earlier salvage therapy for symptomatic disease. Blood 2008;112(8):3122–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musto, P., Falcone, A., Sanpaolo, G. et al. Pamidronate reduces skeletal events but does not improve progression-free survival in early-stage untreated myeloma: results of a randomized trial. Leuk. Lymphoma 2003;44(9):1545–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arena, G., Gobbi, P. G., Broglia, C. et al. Pamidronate versus observation in asymptomatic myeloma: final results with long-term follow-up of a randomized study. Leuk. Lymphoma 2011;52(5):771–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musto, P., Petrucci, M. T., Bringhen, S. et al. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing zoledronic acid versus observation in patients with asymptomatic myeloma. Cancer 2008;113(7):1588–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mateos, M.-V., Lopez-Corral, L., Hernandez, M. et al. Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) at high-risk of progression to symptomatic disease: a phase III, randomized, multicenter trial based on lenalidomide–dexamethasone (len–dex) as induction therapy followed by maintenance therapy with len alone vs no treatment. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2010;116(21):1935.Google Scholar
Lust, J. A., Lacy, M. Q., Zeldenrust, S. R. et al. Induction of a chronic disease state in patients with smoldering or indolent multiple myeloma by targeting interleukin 1{beta}-induced interleukin 6 production and the myeloma proliferative component. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2009;84(2):114–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×