Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T09:47:58.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Critical Evaluation of an in Vitro Model for Evaluation of Platelet Reactivity of Biomaterials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Raymond Connolly
Affiliation:
Dept. Surgery, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St.Boston, MA 02111
Norman Shoenfeld
Affiliation:
Dept. Surgery, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St.Boston, MA 02111
Karen Ramberg
Affiliation:
Dept. Radiology, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St.Boston, MA 02111
Allan D. Callow
Affiliation:
Dept. Surgery, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St.Boston, MA 02111
Get access

Abstract

An in vitro model for measuring platelet reactivity to a variety of biomaterial candidates for vascular grafts is described. A model consisting of a standard area of test material exposed to freshly labeled In platelets in plasma was evaluated. The platelets were isolated from ACD anticoagulated blood and resuspended in ACD plasma. It has been previously demonstrated that platelets so treated circulate in the body and will deposit on biomaterials exposed to the blood in vivo. The in vitro test consisted of an incubation of the platelets and materials at 37°C for one hour. At the end of the incubation, the platelet rich plasma was removed and the materials washed and removed for gamma counting. Platelet reactivity was normalized as a percentage of the counts on the material to counts in an aliquot of the platelet-plasma incubation media. The maximum uptake of platelets occurred within one hour. Platelets from three species, human, baboon, and dog were tested. Platelet uptake by Dacron and PTFE were in the range of 30–40% and 1–5% respectively. This is in accord with the known reactivity of these two vascular graft materials in vivo.

A second series of studies were conducted with physically and pharmacologically inactivated platelets and inert particles. Those studies suggest that the initial results do not represent a biologic event but may reflect the porosity of the materials. This emphasizes the necessity of adequately defining an in vitro model against known in vivo activity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Anderson, J.M. and Kottke-Marchant, K., in Blood Compatibility, Vol.1, edited by Williams, D.F., (CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, FLA, 1987) p. 103.Google Scholar
2. Weiss, H.J., N.Eng.J.Med. 293 531 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Wintrobe, E.H., in Clinical Hematology, 8th ed.,edited by Wintrobe, E.H., (Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1981) p 355.Google Scholar
4. Niewiarowski, S., Poplawski, A., Lipinski, B., and Farbiszewski, R., Exp. Biol. Med. 3 121 (1968)Google Scholar
5. Ross, R., and Glomset, J.A., N.Engl.J.Med. 295 369,1976.Google Scholar
6. Hanson, S.R. and Harker, L.A., in Blood Compatibility,Vol.l, edited by Williams, D.F.,(CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton,FLA,1987) p 41.Google Scholar
7. Vecchione, J.J., Melaragno, A.J., Hotte, C.E., in Indium111 edited by Thakur, M.L. and Gottschalk, A. (Trivirium Publishing Co. New York 1980) pp 721.Google Scholar
8. Callow, A.D., Connolly, R., O'Donnell, T.F., Gembarowicz, R., Keough, E.M., Ramberg, K., Valeri, C.R.,Arch. Surg. 117 1447 (1982)Google Scholar
9. Mackey, W.C., Connolly, R., Callow, A.D., Keough, E.M., Ramberg, K., McCullough, J.L., Melaragno, A. and Valeri, C.R., Ann. Surg. 200 93 (1984)Google Scholar
10. Williams, D.F., in Blood Compatibility, Vol.1, edited by Williams, D.F., (CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, FLA, 1987) p 26.Google Scholar
11. Baumgartner, H.R., Muggli, R., Tschopp, T.B., and Turrito, V.T., Thromb. Haemost. 35 124 (1976).Google Scholar
12. Lages, B. and Weiss, H.J., Thromb. Haemost. 45 173 (1981).Google Scholar
13. Feinman, R.D. and Detwiler, T.C., Nature 249 172 (1974).Google Scholar
14. Feingold, H.M., Pivacek, L.E, Melalagno, A.J., and Valeri, C. R. Am. J. Vet. Res. 47 2197 (1986).Google Scholar