Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:44:11.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Complementary Contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a “Language-based Theory of Learning”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2009

Gordon Wells
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

When children learn language, they are not simply engaging in one type of learning among many; rather, they are learning the foundations of learning itself. The distinctive characteristic of human learning is that it is a process of making meaning – a semiotic process; and the prototypical form of human semiotic is language. Hence the ontogenesis of language is at the same time the ontogenesis of learning.

Halliday, 1993a, p. 93

It is with this bold claim that Halliday opens the article, “Towards a language-based theory of learning” (hereafter, LTL), in which he condenses the conclusions of a lifetime's work on language and its development (Halliday, 1993a). In reading it, I was strongly reminded of Vygotsky's similar claims about the role of language and other “psychological tools” in intellectual development. In this chapter, my aim is to demonstrate the compatibility of these two language-based theories of human development as a way of creating a theoretical framework within which to consider the centrality of linguistic discourse in learning and teaching.

Long-Term Goals and the Choice of a Genetic Approach

There can be no doubt that both Vygotsky and Halliday have made major contributions to their chosen disciplines, Vygotsky in psychology and Halliday in linguistics. However, because of the breadth of their conceptions of their subjects, the impact of their work has also been felt far beyond their “home” disciplines, and perhaps nowhere more strongly than in the field of education. Indeed, both scholars devoted a considerable amount of energy to putting their theoretical ideas to practical use in attempts to improve the quality of children's educational experience.

Type
Chapter
Information
Dialogic Inquiry
Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education
, pp. 3 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×