Element contents
Newborn Imitation
The Stakes of a Controversy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 July 2020
Summary
Newborn imitation has recently become the focus of a major controversy in the human sciences. New studies have reexamined the evidence and found it wanting. Imitation has been regarded as a crucial capability of neonates ever since 1977, when two American psychologists first published experiments appearing to demonstrate that babies at birth are able to copy a variety of facial movements. The findings overturned decades of assumptions about the competence of newborns. But what if claims for newborn imitation are not true? Influential theories about the mechanisms underlying imitation, the role of mirror neurons, the nature of the self and of infant mental states, will all have to be modified or abandoned if it turns out that babies cannot imitate at birth. This Element offers a critical assessment of those theories and the stakes involved.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108920308Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 30 July 2020
References
Anisfeld, M. (2005). No Compelling Evidence to Dispute Piaget’s Timetable of the Development of Representational Imitation in Infancy. In Hurley, S and Chater, N, eds., Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science, Vol II. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 107–31.Google Scholar
Anscombe, A. (1975). The First Person. In Guttenplan, S, ed., Mind and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Bard, K. A. & Russell, C. L. (1999). Evolutionary Foundations of Imitation: Social, Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Imitative Processes in Non-Human Primates. In Nadel, J and Butterworth, V, eds., Imitation in Infancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89–123.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (2011). Unconscious Thought Theory and Its Discontents: A Critique of the Critiques. Social Cognition, 29 (6), 629–47.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The Unbearable Automaticity of Being. American Psychologist, 54 (7), 462–79.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F., Adolphs, R., Martinez, S. & Pollak, S. D. (2019). Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion from Human Facial movements. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20 (1), 1–68. https://doi:10.1177/1529100619832930CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellin, H. (1971). The Development of Physical Concepts. In Mischel, T, ed., Cognitive Development and Epistemology. New York and London: Academic Press, pp. 85–119.Google Scholar
Berg, E. A. (1948). A Simple Objective Technique for Measuring Flexibility in Thinking. Journal of General Psychology, 39 (1), 15–22.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (1995). Ecological Perception and the Notion of a Nonconceptual Point of View. In Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, A, and Eilan, N, eds., The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 153–73.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (1996). The Moral Significance of Birth. Ethics, 106 (1), 378–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bermúdez, J. L. (1998). The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (1999). Psychologism and Psychology. Inquiry(3–4), 42, 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (2005a). Introduction. In Bermúdez, J. L., ed., Thought, Reference and Experience: Themes from the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (2005b). Philosophy of Psychology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. & Cahen, A. (2003; revised 2015). Nonconceptual Mental Content. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/content-nonconceptual/notes.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, A. & Eilan, N. (1995). Self-Consciousness and the Body: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. In Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, A, and Eilan, N, eds., The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R. (1971). The Object in the World of the Infant. Scientific American, 225 (4), 30–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bower, T. G. R. (1974a). Development in Infancy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R. (1974b). The Evolution of Sensory Systems. In McLeod, R. B. and Pick, H. L., eds., Essays in Honor of J. J. Gibson. New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 141–51.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R. (1976). Repetitive Processes in Child Development. Scientific American, 235, 38–47.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R. (1977). A Primer of Infant Development. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R. (1978). Perceptual Development: Object and Space. In Carterette, E. C and Friedman, M, eds., Vol VIII of Handbook of Perception. New York: Academic Press, pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R. (1989a). The Rational Infant: Learning in Infancy. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R. (1989b). The Perceptual World of the Newborn Child. In Slater, A and Bremner, G, eds., Infant Development. Hove, UK; Hillsdale, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R., Broughton, J. M. & Moore, M. K. (1970a). Demonstration of Intention in the Reaching Behavior of Neonate Humans. Nature, 228, 679–81.Google Scholar
Bower, T. G. R., Broughton, J. M. & Moore, M. K. (1970b). The Coordination of Vision and Tactual Input in Infancy. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 8 (1), 51–58.Google Scholar
Boyle, M. (2012). Essentially Rational Animals. In Abel, G and Conant, J, eds., Vol. II of Rethinking Epistemology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyer, pp. 395–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M. (2016). Additive Theories of Rationality: A Critique. European Journal of Philosophy, 24 (3), 527–55.Google Scholar
Brass, M. & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is Cognitive Neuroscience Solving the Correspondence Problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (10), 489–95.Google Scholar
Burman, E. (2017). Deconstructing Developmental Psychology, 3rd ed., London and New York: Routledge, pp. 39–41.Google Scholar
Bushnell, W. R. (1998). The Origins of Face Perception. In Simion, F and Butterworth, G, eds., The Development of Sensory, Motor and Cognitive Capacities in Early Infancy. Hove, Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd., pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. (1982). Object Permanence and Identity in Piaget’s Theory of Infant Cognition. In Butterworth, G, ed., Infancy and Epistemology: An Evaluation of Piaget’s Theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 137–69.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. (1999a). Neonatal Imitation: Existence, Mechanisms and Motives. In Nadel, J and Butterworth, G, eds., Imitation in Infancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–88.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. (1999b). A Developmental-Ecological Perspective on Strawson’s “The Self.” In Gallagher, S and Shear, J, eds., Models of the Self. Charlottesville: Imprint Academic, pp. 203–11.Google Scholar
Calvert, G., Spence, C. & Stein, B. E., eds. (2004). The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M. & Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an Understanding of Mind: The Development of Children’s Understanding Within Social Interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27 (1), 79–96, peer commentary, 96–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catmur, C., Walsh, V. & Heyes, C. (2007). Sensorimotor Learning Configures the Human Mirror System. Current Biology, 17, 1527–31.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. (1969). Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Chapman, M. N. (1987). Inner Processes and Outward Criteria: Wittgenstein’s Importance for Psychology. In Chapman, M and Dixon, R. A., eds., Meaning and the Growth of Understanding: Wittgenstein’s Significance for Developmental Psychology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 103–27.Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (6), 893–910.Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., Maddux, W. W. & Lakin, J. L. (2005). Beyond the Perception-Behavior Link: The Ubiquitous Utility and Motivational Moderators of Nonconscious Mimicry. In Hassin, R. R., Uleman, J. E., and Bargh, J. A., eds., The New Unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 334–61.Google Scholar
Costall, A. & Leudar, I. (2004). Where is the “Theory” in Theory of Mind? Theory and Psychology, 14(5), 623–46.Google Scholar
Coulter, J. (1982). Theoretical Problems in Contemporary Cognitive Science. Inquiry, 25 (1), 3–36.Google Scholar
Coulter, J. (1985). Two Concepts of the Mental. In Gergem, K. J. and Davis, K, eds., The Social Construction of the Person. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 130–44.Google Scholar
Coulter, J. (1987). Recognition in Wittgenstein and Contemporary Thought. In Chapman, M and Dixon, R. A., eds., Meaning and the Growth of Understanding: Wittgenstein’s Significance for Developmental Psychology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 85–102.Google Scholar
Coulter, J. (2008). Twenty-Five Theses Against Cognitivism. Theory Culture Society, 25(2), 19–32.Google Scholar
Coulter, J. & Sharrock, W. (2007). Brain, Mind and Human Behavior in Contemporary Cognitive Science: Critical Assessments of the Philosophy of Psychology. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Crane, T. (ed). (1992). The Non-Conceptual Content of Experience. The Contents of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–58.Google Scholar
Crivelli, C. & Fridlund, A. J. (2018). Facial Displays are Tools for Social Influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22 (5), 388–99.Google Scholar
Crivelli, C., Jarillo, S., Russell, J. A. & Fernández-Dols, J. M. (2016a). Reading Emotions from Faces in Two Indigenous Societies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145 (7), 830–43.Google Scholar
Crivelli, C., Russell, J. A., Jarillo, S. & Fernández-Dols, J. M. (2016b). The Fear Gasping Face as a Threat Display in a Melanesian society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 113 (44), 12403–12407.Google Scholar
Cussins, A. (1990). The Connectionist Construction of Concepts. In Boden, M, ed., The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 368–440.Google Scholar
Davis, J., Redshaw, J., Suddendorf, T., et al. (2020). Does Neonatal Imitation Exist? Insights from a Meta-Analysis of 336 Effect Sizes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Decety, J. & Meltzoff, A. N. (2011). Empathy, Imitation, and the Social Brain. In Copland, A and Goldie, P, eds., Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 58–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decock, L. & Douven, I. (2011). Similarity After Goodman. Review of Philosophical Psychology, 2 (1), 61–75.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dunkeld, J. (1978). The Function of Imitation in Infancy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Duran, J. I., Reisenzein, R. & Fernández-Dols, J. M. (2017). Coherence Between Emotions and Facial Expressions. In Fernández-Dols, J. M. and Russell, J. A., eds., The Science of Facial Expression, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–29.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants Across Cultures in the Face and Emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17 (2), 124–29.Google Scholar
Field, T. M., Goldstein, S., Vega-Lahr, N., and Porter, K. (1986). Changes in Imitative Behavior During Early Infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 9 (4), 415–21.Google Scholar
Field, T. M., Woodson, R., Cohen, D. et al. (1983). Discrimination and Imitation of Facial Expressions by Term and Preterm Neonates. Infant Behavior and Development 6(4), 485–89.Google Scholar
Field, T. M., Woodson, R., Greenberg, R. & Cohen, D. (1982). Discrimination and Imitation of Facial Expressions by Neonates. Science, New Series, 218 (4568), 179–81.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1981). Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, R. (1984). Imitative Skill Between Birth and Six Months. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(3), 323–33.Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. J. (2017). The Behavioral Ecology View of Facial Displays, 25 Years Later. In Fernández-Dols, J. M. and Russell, J. A., eds., The Science of Facial Expression, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (1996). The Moral Significance of Primitive Self-Consciousness. Ethics, 107(1), 129–40.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical Conceptions of the Self: Implications for Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (1), 14–21.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2001). Emotion and Intersubjective Perception: A Speculative Account. In Kaszniak, A, ed., Emotions, Qualia, and Consciousness. River Edge: World Scientific Publishing Co., pp. 95–100.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. & Marcel, A. J. (1999). The Self in Contextualized Action. In Gallagher, S and Shear, J, eds., Models of the Self. Charlottesville: Imprint Academic, pp. 273–99.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996). The Earliest Sense of Self and Others: Merleau-Ponty and Recent Developmental Studies. Philosophical Psychology, 9 (2), 211–34.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2007). The Two Sides of Mimesis: Mimetic Theory, Embodied Simulation, and Social Identification. In Garrels, S. R., ed., Mimesis and Science: Empirical Research on Imitation and the Mimetic Theory of Culture and Religion. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, pp. 87–108.Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Gernsbacher, M. A., Heyes, C., Hickok, G. & Iacoboni, M. (2011). Mirror Neuron Forum. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6 (4), 369–407.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. & Gardner, H. (1970). A Note on Selective Imitation by a Six-Week Old Infant. Child Development 4, 1209–13.Google Scholar
Gendron, M., Roberson, D., van der Vyver, J. M. & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Perceptions of Emotion from Facial Expressions are not Culturally Universal: Evidence from a Remote Culture. Emotion, 124 (2), 251–62.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. & Walk, R. D. (1960). The Visual Cliff. Scientific American, 202 (4), 67–71.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1972). Seven Strictures on Similarity. Problems and Projects. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, pp. 437–46.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. (1994). How We Know Our Minds: The Illusion of First-Person Knowledge of Intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Guenther, K. (2017). Monkeys, Mirrors and Me: Gordon G. Gallup and the Study of Self-Recognition. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 53 (1), 5–27.Google Scholar
Guenther, Y. H. (2003). Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. (1971). Epistemology and Development. In Mischel, T, eds., Cognitive Development and Epistemology. New York & London: Academic Press, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. (1978). Experience and the Growth of Understanding. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2005). Grasping Action. In Hurley, S and Chater, N, eds., Perspectives on Imitation. From Neuroscience to Social Science, Vol II. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 173–78.Google Scholar
Hayes, L. A. & Watson, J. S. (1981). Neonatal Imitation: Fact or Artifact? Developmental Psychology, 17 (5), 655–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimann, M. (1999). Notes on Individual Differences and the Assumed Elusiveness of Neonatal Imitation. In Meltzoff, A. N. and Prinz, W, eds., The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution, and Brain Bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–84.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation by Association. In Hurley, S and Chater, N, eds., Perspectives on Imitation. Mechanisms of Imitation and Imitation in Animals, Vol I. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 157–76.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. (2014). The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Hornsby, J. (1997). Simple Mindedness. In Defense of Naïve Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Iacobini, M. (2009). Imitation, Empathy, and Mirror Neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653–670.Google Scholar
Jones, S. (1996). Imitation or Exploration? Young Infants’ Matching of Adults’ Oral Gestures. Child Development, 67 (5), 1952–969.Google Scholar
Jones, S. (2005). The Role of Mirror Neurons in Imitation. In Perspectives on Imitation. Vol. 1. Mechanisms of Imitation and Imitation in Animals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 205–210.Google Scholar
Jones, S. (2006). Exploration or Imitation? The Effect of Music on 4-week-old Infants’ Tongue Protrusion. Infant Behavior and Development, 29 (1), 126–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S. (2009). The Development of Imitation in Infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 364 (1528), 2325–335.Google Scholar
Jones, S. (2016). Can Newborns Imitate? WIREs Cognitive Science, 8 (1–2), e1410. https://doi:10.1002/wcs.1410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S. (2017). The Case Against Newborn Imitation Grows Stronger. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16001886CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaitz, M., Meschulach-Sarfaty, O., Auerbach, J. & Eidelman, A. (1988). A Reexamination of Newborns’ Ability to Imitate Facial Expressions. Developmental Psychology, 24 (1), 3–7.Google Scholar
Kaplan, B. (ed.) (1971). Foreword. Imitation in Children. By Guillaume, Paul. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971, pp. xv–xvi.Google Scholar
Kennedy-Constantini, S., Oostenbroek, J., Suddendorf, T., et al. (2017). There is No Compelling Evidence that Human Neonates Imitate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 28–29.Google Scholar
Kessen, W. (1996). American Psychology Just Before Piaget. Psychological Science, 7 (4), 196–99.Google Scholar
Keven, N. & Akins, K. A. (2017). Neonatal Imitation in Context: Sensory-Motor Development in the Perinatal Period. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–58.Google Scholar
Leudar, I. & Costall, A., eds. (2011). Against Theory of Mind. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers Limited.Google Scholar
Leys, R. (2007). From Guilt to Shame: Auschwitz and After. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Leys, R. (2012). “Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula”: Mirror Neuron Theory and Emotional Empathy. nonsite.org, #5. Reprinted in Biess, F and Gross, D, eds., Science and Emotions After 1945: A Transatlantic Perspective (2014). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 67–95.Google Scholar
Leys, R. (2017). The Ascent of Affect: Genealogy and Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveland, K. (1986). Discovering the Affordances of a Reflecting Surface. Developmental Review, 6 (2), 1–24.Google Scholar
Lymer, J. (2014). Infant Imitation and the Self. A Response to Welsh. Philosophical Psychology, 27 (2), 235–57.Google Scholar
Lyyra, P. (2009). Two Senses for “Givenness of Consciousness.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 67–87.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, E. (2015). Associationist Theories of Thought. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/associationist-thought/Google Scholar
Maratos, O. (1973). The Origin and Development of Imitation in the First Six Months of Life. Doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. J. & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014). Neural Mirroring Mechanisms and Imitation in Human Infants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences 369(1644), 20130620. https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0620Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1994). The Content of Perceptual Experience. The Philosophical Quarterly, 44 (175), 190–205.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2009). Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind. The Engaged Intellect. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 257–75.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (1982). Imitation, Intermodal Coordination and Representation in Early Infancy. In Butterworth, G, ed., Infancy and Epistemology: An Evaluation of Piaget’s Theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 85–114.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (1985a). Immediate and Deferred Imitation in Fourteen- and Twenty-Four-Month-Old Infants. Child Development, 56 (1), 62–72.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (1985b). The Roots of Social and Cognitive Development: Models of Man’s Original Nature. In Field, T. M. and Fox, N. A., eds., Social Perception in Infants. University of Michigan: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (1988). The Human Infant as Homo Imitans. In Zentall, T. R. and Galef, B. G., eds., Social Learning: Psychological and Biological Perspectives. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 319–41.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (1990). Foundations for Developing a Concept of Self: The Role of Imitation in Relating Self to Other and the Value of Social Mirroring, Social Modeling, and Self Practice in Infancy. In Cicchetti, D and Beeghly, M, eds., The Self in Transition: Infancy to Childhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 139–64.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). Elements of a Developmental Theory of Imitation. In Meltzoff, A. N. and Prinz, W, eds., The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution, and Brain Bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–41.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). Imitation and Other Minds: The “Like Me” Hypothesis. In Hurley, S and Chater, N, eds., Perspectives on Imitation. From Neuroscience to Social Science, Vol II. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 55–77.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (2007a). “Like Me”: A Foundation for Social Cognition. Developmental Science, 10 (1), 126–34.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (2007b). The “Like Me” Framework for Recognizing and Becoming an Intentional Agent. Acta Psychologica, 124 (1), 26–43.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Elements of a Comprehensive Theory of Imitation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 32–33.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Borton, R. W. (1979). Intermodal Matching by Human Neonates. Nature, 282, 403–4.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Brooks, R. (2001). “Like Me” as a Building Block for Understanding Other Minds: Bodily Acts, Attention, and Intention. In Maille, B. F., Moses, L. J., and Baldwin, D. W., eds., Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 171–92.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. (2003). What Imitation Tells Us About Social Cognition: A Rapprochement Between Developmental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B. Biological Sciences, 358 (1431), 491–500.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Gopnik, A. (1993). The Role of Imitation in Understanding Persons and Developing a Theory of Mind. In Baron-Cohen, S, Tager-Flusberg, H, and Cohen, D. J., eds., Understanding Other Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 335–66.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates. Science, new series, 198 (4312), 75–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1983). The Origins of Imitation in Infancy: Paradigm, Phenomena, and Theories. Advances in Infancy Research, 2, 265–301.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1989). Imitation in Newborn Infants: Exploring the Range of Gestures and the Underlying Mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 25 (6), 954–62.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1992). Early Imitation Within a Functional Framework: The Importance of Person Identity, Movement, and Development. Infant Behavior and Development, 15 (4), 479–505.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1994). Imitation, Memory, and the Representation of Persons. Infant Behavior and Development, 17(1), 83–99.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1995a). A Theory of the Role of Imitation in the Emergence of the Self. In Rochat, P, ed., The Self in Infancy: Theory and Research. New York: Elsevier, pp. 73–93.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1995b). Infant’s Understanding of People and Things: From Body Imitation to Folk Psychology. In Bermúdez, J. L., Marcel, A, and Eilan, N, eds., The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 43–69.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model. Early Development and Parenting, 6 (3–4), 179–92.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N. & Prinz, W. (2002). The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution, and Brain Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., Gopnik, A. & Repacholi, B. M. (1999). Toddlers’ Understanding of Intentions, Desires, and Emotions: Explorations of the Dark Ages. In Zelazo, P. D., Astington, J. W., and Olson, D. R., eds., Developing Theories of Intention: Social Underestanding and Self-Control. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K. & Moore, M. K. (1991). Perception, Representation, and the Control of Action in Newborns and Infants. Toward a Synthesis. In Weiss, M. J. and Zelazo, P, eds., Newborn Attention: Biological Constraints and the Influence of Experience. Norwood: Ablex Pub. Corp., pp. 377–411.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., Murray, L., Simpson, E., et al. (2018). Re-examination of Oostenbroek et al. (2016): Evidence for Neonatal Imitation of Tongue Protrusion. Developmental Science, 21 (4), e12609. https://doi.10.1111/desc.12609Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., Murray, L., Simpson, E., et al. (2019). Eliciting Imitation in Early Infancy. Developmental Science, 22 (2), e12738. https://doi: 10.1111/desc. 12738Google Scholar
Michaels, W. Benn. (2004). The Shape of the Signifier. From 1967 to the End of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Michotte, A. G., Thinès, R. & Crabbé, G. (1964). Les compléments amodaux des structures perspectives. Louvain, Belgium: Publications U. Louvain.Google Scholar
Moore, M. K. & Meltzoff, A. N. (1975). Neonate Imitation: A Test of Existence and Mechanism. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Moore, K. M. & Meltzoff, A. N. (1978). Object Permanence, Imitation, and Language Development in Infancy: Toward a Neo-Piagetian Perspective on Communicative and Cognitive Development. In Minifie, F. D. and Lloyd, L, eds., Communication and Cognitive Abilities – Early Behavioral Assessment. Baltimore: University Park Press, pp. 151–84.Google Scholar
Morawski, J. (2019). The Replication Crisis: How Might Philosophy and Theory of Psychology Be of Use? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39 (4), 218–39.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. J. (1977). Molyneux’s Question: Vision, Touch, and the Philosophy of Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nehaniv, C. L. & Dautenhahn, K. (2002). The Correspondence Problem. In Dautenhahn, K and Nehaniv, C. L., eds., Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 41–61.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (ed.) (1987). Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988). Five Kinds of Self-Knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1 (1), 35–59.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1991). Two Perceptually Given Aspects of the Self and Their Development. Developmental Review, 11(3), 197–209.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (ed.) (1993). The Perceived Self: Ecological and Interpersonal Sources of Self-Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. A. (1987). Recognition of Facial Expressions in the First Two Years of Life: Mechanisms of Development. Child Development, 58 (4), 889–909.Google Scholar
Oostenbroek, J., Slaughter, V., Nielsen, M. & Suddendorf, T. (2013). Why the Confusion Around Neonatal Imitation? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 31 (4), 328–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2013.832180Google Scholar
Oostenbroek, J., Suddendorf, T., Nielsen, M., et al. (2016). Comprehensive Longitudinal Study Challenges the Existence of Neonatal Imitation in Humans. Current Biology, 26 (2016), 1334–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.047Google Scholar
Oostenbroek, J., Redshaw, J., Slaughter, V., et al. (2018). Re-Evaluating the Neonatal Hypothesis. Developmental Science, 22 (2), e12720. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12720Google Scholar
Parton, D. A. (1976). Learning to Imitate in Infancy. Child Development, 47 (1), 14–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacocke, C. (2005). “Another I”: Representing Conscious States, Perception, and Others. In Bermúdez, J. L., eds., Thought, Reference and Experience: Themes from the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 220–57.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. (2014). The Mirror of the World: Subjects, Consciousness, and Self-Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1953). The Origin of Intelligence in the Child. Translated by Margaret Cook. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. Translated by Margaret Cook. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1962). Plays, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. Translated by C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1972). Principles of Genetic Epistemology. Translated by Wolfe Mays. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. Translated by Helen Weaver. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.) (1980). Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Poulson, C. L., de Paula Nunes, L. R. & Warren, S. F. (1989). Imitation in Infancy: A Critical Review. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 22, 271–98.Google Scholar
Praetorius, N. (2009). The Phenomenological Underpinning of the Notion of a Minimal Core Self: A Psychological Perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 18 (3), 325–38.Google Scholar
Prinz, W. (2012). Open Minds: The Social Making of Agency and Intentionality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, W. & Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). An Introduction to the Imitative Mind and Brain. In Meltzoff, A. N. and Prinz, W, eds., The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution, and Brain Bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, A. (2009). Cognition and Perception: How Do Psychology and Neural Science Inform Philosophy? Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, E. & Heyes, C. (2011). Imitation in Infancy: The Wealth of the Stimulus. Developmental Science, 14 (1), 92–105.Google Scholar
Redshaw, J., Nielsen, M., Slaughter, V., et al. (2020). Individual Differences in Neonatal “Imitation” Fail to Predict Early Social Cognitive Behavior. Developmental Science, 23(2), e12892. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12892Google Scholar
Rodkey, E. (2015). The Visual Cliff’s Forgotten Menagerie: Rats, Goats, Babies, and Myth-Making in the History of Psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 51 (2), 113–40.Google Scholar
Ruba, A, L. & Repacholi, B. M. (2019). Do Preverbal Infants Understand Discrete Facial Expressions of Emotion? Emotion Review. https://doi.10.1177/1754073919871098Google Scholar
Russell, J. (1979). The Status of Genetic Epistemology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 9(1), 53–70.Google Scholar
Russell, J. (1982). Piaget’s Theory of Sensori-Motor Development: Outlines, Assumptions, Problems. In Butterworth, G, ed., Infancy and Epistemology: An Evaluation of Piaget’s Theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1994). Is There Universal Expression of Emotions from Facial Expressions? A Review of Cross-Cultural Studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115 (1), 102–41.Google Scholar
Saby, J. N., Marshall, P. J. & Meltzoff, A. N. (2012). Neural Correlates of Being Imitated: An EEG Study in Preverbal Infants. Social Neuroscience, 7, 650–51.Google Scholar
Schear, J. K. (2009). Experience and Self-Consciousness. Philosophical Studies, 144 (1), 95–105.Google Scholar
Sedivy, S. (1996). Must Conceptually Informed Perceptual Experience Involve Non-Conceptual Content? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26 (3), 413–31.Google Scholar
Simpson, E. A., Murray, L., Paukner, A. & Ferrari, P. F. (2014). The Mirror Neuron System as Revealed Through Neonatal Imitation: Presence from Birth, Predictive Power and Evidence of Plasticity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Series B Biological Sciences, 369 (1644), 1–12.Google Scholar
Sorce, J. F., Emde, R. N., Campos, J. & Klinnert, M. D. (1985). Maternal Emotional Signaling: Its Effect on the Visual Cliff Behavior of 1-Year Olds. Developmental Psychology, 21 (1), 195–200.Google Scholar
Stein, B. E. & Meredith, M. Alex. (1993). The Merging of the Senses. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stein, B. E., Stanford, T. R. & Rowland, B. A. (2014). Development of Multisensory Integration from the Perspective of the Individual Neuron. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 15 (8), 520–35.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T., Oostenbroek, J., Nielson, M. & Slaughter, V. (2013). Is Newborn Imitation Developmentally Homologous to Later Social-Cognitive Skills? Developmental Psychobiology, 55 (1), 52–58.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. & McCarter, R. (1964). What and Where are the Primary Affects? Some Evidence for a Theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18(1), 119–58.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1983). Emotions in Infancy: Regulators of Contacts and Relationships with Persons. In Scherer, K & Ekman, P, eds., Approaches to Emotion. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 129–51.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1993). The Self Born in Intersubjectivity: The Psychology of an Infant Communicating. In Neisser, U, ed., The Perceived Self: Ecological and Interpersonal Sources of Self-Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–75.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C., Kokkinaki, T. & Fiamenghi, G. A. Jr. (1999). What Infants’ Imitations Communicate: With Mothers, With Fathers, and With Peers. In Nadel, J and Butterworth, G, eds., Imitation in Infancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–85.Google Scholar
Van Baaren, R., Janssen, L., Chartrand, T. L. & Dijksterhuis, A. (2009). Where is the Love? The Social Aspects of Mimicry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 364 (1528), 2381–89.Google Scholar
Vincini, S. (2020). “The Pairing Account of Infant Direct Social Perception. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 27 (1–2), 173–205.Google Scholar
Vincini, S. & Jhang, Y. (2018). Association but not Recognition: An Alternative Model for Differential Imitation from O to 2 Months. Review of Philosophical Psychology, 9, 395–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincini, S., Jhang, Y., Buder, E H. & Gallagher, S. (2017a). Neonatal Imitation: Theory, Experimental Design, and Significance for the Field of Social Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 (1323), 1–16.Google Scholar
Vincini, S., Jhang, Y., Buder, E. H. & Gallagher, S. (2017b). An Unsettled Debate: Key Empirical and Theoretical Questions are Still Open. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40, 37–38, doi.org.10.1017. S0140525X16001977.Google Scholar
Welsh, T. (2006). Do Neonates Display Innate Self-Awareness? Why Neonatal Imitation Fails to Provide Sufficient Ground for Innate Self- and Other- Awareness. Philosophical Psychology, 19 (2), 221–38.Google Scholar
Wicker, B., Keysers,. C., Plailly, J. et al. (2003). Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula: The Common Neural Basis of Seeing and Feeling Disgust. Neuron, 40 (3), 655–64.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (1999). Wittgenstein, Mind and Meaning: Towards a Social Conception of Mind. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2002). First-Person Thoughts and Embodied Self-Awareness: Some Reflections on the Relation Between Recent Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 7–26.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2004). Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 331–47.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2008). Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2011). The Experiential Self: Objections and Clarifications. In Siderits, M, Thompson, E, and Zahavi, D, eds., Self or No Self? Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–76.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2013). Mindedness, Mindlessness, and First-Person Authority. In Schear, J, ed., Mind, Reasons, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 320–43.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2014). Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2018). “Consciousness, Self-Consciousness, Selfhood: A Reply to Some Critics. Review of Philosophical Psychology, 9, 703–18.Google Scholar
Zwan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucase, R. E. & Donellan, M. B. (2018). Making Replication Mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, 1–61.Google Scholar
- 13
- Cited by