Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:45:41.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Statistical analysis of sex ratios: an introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Kenneth Wilson
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Stirling, United Kingdom
Ian C.W. Hardy
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Animal Population Biology School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham
Ian C. W. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

Summary

In this chapter we discuss how to make best use of sex ratio data. We identify three basic questions that such data can be used to answer: does the sex ratio differ from some theoretically expected mean value, does it differ from an expected distribution and is variation in sex ratio associated with some measured explanatory terms? Our main focus is on the latter question. We discuss analytical methods in order of ‘sophistication’, starting with nonparametric methods (which make few assumptions about underlying statistical distributions), then classical parametric methods (which assume that data conform to a normal distribution of deviations from a statistical model) and finally generalized linear models (GLMs). GLMs are semi-parametric methods that encompass models assuming a normal distribution but may also assume other distributions. This is an important advantage as sex ratio data are best expressed as proportions (sex ratio = males/(males + females)) and deviations are expected to conform to a binomial distribution. GLMs assuming binomial distributions are often termed logistic regression models. Distributions may not conform to the normal or binomial assumptions of classical parametric analyses or logistic GLMs, and we discuss how these problems can be overcome. The statistical approaches we discuss are illustrated with worked examples and case histories from recent sex ratio literature. We also perform simulations to evaluate the relative performances of nonparametric, classical parametric and logistic GLM analyses: GLMs win.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sex Ratios
Concepts and Research Methods
, pp. 48 - 92
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agresti A (1990) Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley
Aitkin M, Anderson D, Francis B & Hinde J (1989) Statistical Modelling in GLIM. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Austad, S N & Sunquist, M E (1986) Sex-ratio manipulation in the common opossum. Nature, 324, 58–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edn. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Collett D (1991) Modelling Binary Data. New York: Chapman & Hall
Cox D R & Snell E J (1989) Analysis of Binary Data, 2nd edn. New York: Chapman & Hall
Crawley M J (1993) GLIM for Ecologists. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publishing
Crawley M J (2002) Statistical Computing. London: John Wiley
Dobson A J (1990) An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models, New York: Chapman & Hall
Elston, D A (1998) Estimation of denominator degrees of freedom of F distributions for assessing Wald statistics for fixed effect factors in unbalanced mixed models. Biometrics, 54, 1085–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney D J (1971) Probit Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fisher R A (1954) Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 12th edn. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd
Flanagan, K E, West, S A & Godfray, H C J (1998) Local mate competition, variable fecundity and information use in a parasitoid. Animal Behaviour, 56, 191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis B, Green M & Payne C (eds) (1993) The GLIM System: Release 4 Manual. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hardy, I C W (1997) Opossum sex ratios revisited: significant or nonsignificant?American Naturalist, 150, 420–424CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, I C W & Field, S A (1998) Logistic analysis of animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 56, 787–792CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, I C W & Mayhew, P J (1998) Sex ratio, sexual dimorphism and mating structure in bethylid wasps. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, I R, Griffith, S C, Wilson, K, Shepherd, M & Burke, T (1999) Nestling sex ratios in the polygynously breeding Corn Bunting Miliaria calandra. Journal of Avian Biology 30, 7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer D W & Lemeshow S (1989) Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley
Hunter FM, Jones IL, Wilson K, Dawson DA & Burke TA (in prep.) Manipulation of offspring sex in species with mutual sexual selection
Kilner, R (1998) Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches. Animal Behaviour, 56, 155–164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krackow, S & Tkadlec, E (2001) Analysis of brood sex ratios: implications of offspring clustering. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruuk, L E B, Clutton-Brock, T H, Albon, S D, Pemberton, J M & Guinness, F E (1999) Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature 399, 459–461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, M L & Weatherhead, P J (1996) Dominance rank and offspring sex ratios in domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour, 51, 725–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, M L & Weatherhead, P J (1998) Erratum. Animal Behaviour, 55, 777Google Scholar
Lipsey M W (1990) Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research. London: Sage Publications
Mathsoft Inc (1999) S-Plus Guide to Statistics, volume 1. Seattle: Mathsoft. Inc
McCallum H (2000) Population Parameters: Estimation for Ecological Models. Oxford: Blackwell Science
McCullagh P & Nelder J A (1989) Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. New York: Chapman & Hall
Meddis R (1984) Statistics Using Ranks: A Unified Approach. Oxford: Blackwell
Menard S (1995) Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07–106. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Neave H R & Worthington P L (1988) Distribution-free Tests. New York: Routledge
Petersen, G & G, Hardy I C (1996) The importance of being larger: parasitoid intruder-owner contests and their implications for clutch size. Animal Behaviour, 51, 1363–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, W R (1990) A consensus combined P-value test and the family-wide significance of component tests. Biometrics, 46, 303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, W R & Gaines, S D (1994) ‘Heads I win, tails you use’: testing directional alternative hypotheses in ecological and evolutionary research. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 235–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf F J & Sokal R R (1995) Statistical Tables, 3rd edn. New York: WH Freeman & Co
SAS Institute Inc (1995) Logistic Regression Examples Using the SAS System, Version 6, 1st edn. Cary, NC: SAS
Shanubhogue, A & Gore, P (1987) Using logistic regression in ecology. Current Science, 20, 933–935Google Scholar
Siegel S & Castellan N J (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill
Sokal R R & Rohlf F J (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. New York: WH Freeman & Co
SPSS (1999) SPSS Base 9.0 User's Guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc
Sunquist, M E & Eisenberg, J F (1993) Reproductive strategies of female Didelphus. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, Biological Sciences, 36, 109–140Google Scholar
Trexler, J C & Travis, J (1993) Nontraditional regression analyses. Ecology, 74, 1629–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerdahl, H, Bensch, S, Hansson, B, Hasselquist, D & Schantz, T (1997) Sex ratio variation among broods of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Molecular Ecology, 6, 543–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D A (1982) Extra-binomial variation in logistic linear models. Applied Statistics, 31, 144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K & Grenfell, B T (1997) Generalized linear modelling for parasitologists. Parasitology Today, 13, 33–38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, K, Grenfell, B T & Shaw, D J (1996) Analysis of aggregated parasite distributions: a comparison of methods. Functional Ecology, 10, 592–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D D, Ryser, J J & Kiltie, R A (1995) First-cohort advantage hypothesis: a new twist on facultative sex ratio adjustment. American Naturalist, 145, 133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar J H (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×